[Case-Study] - This is why you shouldn't use ChatGPT in your SEO content

Danki

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2019
Messages
966
Reaction score
1,089
I just want to share with you a good case study about AI Content detection. The case study used only public tools, and it turns out that ChatGPT failed in all of them.

Ai content detection case study


The case study is made by Matthew Woodward. Note: "My post" in this pic is not an AI, it's just a human-text post.

Code:
https://www.searchlogistics.com/case-studies/ai-content-detection-case-study
 
Interesting, I have rytr and the quality is low now, probably I will sell my ltd account
 
not sure what Frase is doing here as it's a content optimization tool, not an AI writer. But yeah, I wasn't going to use chatGPT anyway, I always sit back and enjoy the mass murders of new technology adopters for a few years before I start using it. People be cray these days :)
 
I just want to share with you a good case study about AI Content detection. The case study used only public tools, and it turns out that ChatGPT failed in all of them.

Ai content detection case study


The case study is made by Matthew Woodward. Note: "My post" in this pic is not an AI, it's just a human-text post.

Code:
https://www.searchlogistics.com/case-studies/ai-content-detection-case-study
This thread was posted yesterday

https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/case-study-why-you-should-not-used-ai-content-writers.1471575/
 
Google has already said that all A.I content falls under 'auto-generated content', which is strictly against their spam guidelines.

Several people are making thousands of dollars with A.I content, thinking its going to last forever. Truth is, Google already knows your content is A.I generated, you're still indexed, because its probably training its A.I text detection models, and it's not ready yet.

Once the update drops, each of these websites will get deindexed to death.
 
If you're using ChatGPT/Jasper as a skeleton, a frame to build out your content, then you'll be fine. You must read the final edit, make sure it flows well, doesn't have incorrect bs, and addresses the search intent. That is the proper use case. However, most idiots just want to --> push button = generate content --> post on site. Pump out in large volumes, then pee their pants and complain when updates kill their sites ROFL! You had it coming. Well deserved.

ALSO if you are non-native AND your writing sounds ESL, then you just can't judge AI vs. human written content. Let it go bro. Hire an editor if you're using AI or get ready for the hammer. You are asking for it.
 
I just used GPTZero and it said it's likely human. I wouldn't really rely on this article.
 
I just want to share with you a good case study about AI Content detection. The case study used only public tools, and it turns out that ChatGPT failed in all of them.

Ai content detection case study


The case study is made by Matthew Woodward. Note: "My post" in this pic is not an AI, it's just a human-text post.

Code:
https://www.searchlogistics.com/case-studies/ai-content-detection-case-study
the simple question is:

does ai bring me targeted traffic?
1. if yes, then continue doing ai content
2. if no, then dont bother with ai
 
ChatGPT has spoiled my blog too. Now I don’t believe what google says.
 
content of an human and a machine could be clearly detected, there is also plagiarism issues also
 
If you're using ChatGPT/Jasper as a skeleton, a frame to build out your content, then you'll be fine. You must read the final edit, make sure it flows well, doesn't have incorrect bs, and addresses the search intent. That is the proper use case. However, most idiots just want to --> push button = generate content --> post on site. Pump out in large volumes, then pee their pants and complain when updates kill their sites ROFL! You had it coming. Well deserved.

ALSO if you are non-native AND your writing sounds ESL, then you just can't judge AI vs. human written content. Let it go bro. Hire an editor if you're using AI or get ready for the hammer. You are asking for it.

This, just this!

Google doesn’t care how content is generated as long as useful for the traffic they send you and interactive, if it isn’t, what’s the point of sending people
 
Back
Top