1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

[Case Study] Is this SEO suspicious?

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by cpa-marketing, May 1, 2014.

  1. cpa-marketing

    cpa-marketing Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2013
    Messages:
    356
    Likes Received:
    108
    Hey guys,

    I'm making a case study on effective SEO techniques. One of the techniques is tier link building + a twist.

    I have a money site with 10 pages. I need to make SEO for each page. Should I:

    1- build 10 unique web 2.0 properties for each of my 10 pages? (Total = 100 web 2.0 properties with 1 post each)

    OR

    2- build only 10 unique web 2.0 properties and each one has 10 posts and each post links to one of my 10 pages? (Total = 10 Web 2.0 properties with 10 posts each)

    OR

    3- build 25 unique web 2.0 properties and each one has 4 posts and each post links randomly to one of my 10 pages? (Total = 25 web 2.0 properties with 4 posts each + Random effect so it looks natural).
    Note: in method 3, there maybe 2 or more web 2.0 properties linking the same URLs.


    So which of these is less suspicious with minimum handwork (method 1 requires a lot pf proxies and such).

    Kindly read my question well before answering.
    Please refrain from telling me "try it"..Of course i'm not gonna spend 1 month on trying something that everyone else tries. So i need your expert opinion please.

    Thank you guys :)
     
  2. innosoft

    innosoft Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,633
    Likes Received:
    639
    Occupation:
    Software Developer, SEO
    Location:
    Office
    Home Page:
    i would go with 3rd one.
     
  3. cpa-marketing

    cpa-marketing Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2013
    Messages:
    356
    Likes Received:
    108
    me too ...but wouldnt this happend?

    web 2.0 X -> links to -> pages 1,2,3,4
    web 2.0 Y -> links to -> pages 1,4,5,9
    web 2.0 Z - > links to -> pages 1,8,4,11

    In the above, the 3 web 2.0 properties are linking to pages 1 & 4..isn't that like suspecious?
     
  4. splasherizer

    splasherizer Newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2014
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Option 3 would leave the least footprint and would look more professional, however it could also mean losing everything if your property is deleted.
     
  5. cpa-marketing

    cpa-marketing Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2013
    Messages:
    356
    Likes Received:
    108
    if one property goes only 5 posts are affected, i can live with that..but what im truly afraid of is google suspecting in them
     
  6. lover

    lover Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    813
    Location:
    BHW
    Whatever option you choose, try to also link out to some authority sites in your niche.

    All the web 2.0 linking out to same set of site is one of the footprint which you may want to avoid.
     
  7. cpa-marketing

    cpa-marketing Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2013
    Messages:
    356
    Likes Received:
    108
    Great Advice mate thank you :)
    anyone else?
     
  8. theIMMachine

    theIMMachine Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2011
    Messages:
    339
    Likes Received:
    138
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    IM, Designs
    Location:
    Everywhere :)
    Wow, I was also looking for the query of such a situation. Well, Me will also go with the 3rd option, but it would be great if you do it within a month.

    To avoid footprints, in the 3rd option, I would definitely give a link back to Wikipedia or Howstuffworks site if they have the information on your keyword. Because that looks even better and more natural to Google.

    Also building 5 web 2.0's a month, and constantly increasing its pages by unique content and linking back to your website also looks normal. I will also do manual social bookmarks and a good number of social signals to the money site. Thats what I do for my money sites. :)
     
  9. cpa-marketing

    cpa-marketing Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2013
    Messages:
    356
    Likes Received:
    108
    so your tier 1 is web 2.0, social bookmarks and social signals?