It's not a cost issue, mainly because ~30 posts is the limit of the spun article I submitted. When I write a good one, I'll increase the flow. Also, the KW is extremely uncompetitive, should see some movement. Still, all the 400 credits will be spent on this KW. After that If it ranks, I'll get a full 2k credits subscription.
[Case Study] High PR Society - 8 different websites - 800 Posts
- Thread starter nik-0
- Start date
Aah okay, got it, 30 posts can indeed move an easy keyword, I did this myself with several innerpages that were real easy as well, all of them are from nowhere to page 1. You know when you sign up for a subscription that you can cancel it right away? That way it's just like you are buying credits instead of subscribing, personally I hate subscriptions.
No idea why the creators of highPRsociety have setup it in such way that you get subscribed (well no idea, actually its quite obvious, people might forget about it and credits get added automatically the month after = more revenue). That's the only part I don't like about it, but again its real easy to unsubsribe after buying the credits.
Only postings.
I think it's pretty much required to do such things subscription-based, I don't blame them and would have done it the same way. People today have the attention span of ants and most people would quickly forget about the service, despite how effective it may have been in increasing their rankings. Also, homepage links require monthly credits.
Small update in rankings:
Keyword 1: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Keyword 2: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: 10
Keyword 3: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: 12
Keyword 4: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Keyword 5: Google: 44 - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Keyword 6: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Keyword 7: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Keyword 8: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Keyword 1: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Keyword 2: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: 10
Keyword 3: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: 12
Keyword 4: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Keyword 5: Google: 44 - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Keyword 6: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Keyword 7: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Keyword 8: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
94726
BANNED
- Feb 6, 2010
- 377
- 195
burgers
Junior Member
- Jul 13, 2011
- 150
- 75
Great case study! I actually did this myself for my own sites and the results have been amazing with HRPS. I did very similar study, 100 posts at a rate of 5 per day. Around the 2 weeks mark, keywords start to move and move well. I also used some of the blog comments to diversity the keywords. I also build links for clients that don't want the hassle of content creation and spinning and they have had good results as well.
BTW the indexing rates of HPS are nonexistent - close to the 0% mark. I did some checking and nothing is actually indexed (I mean the posts - the actual domains are), even posts from a week ago. Probably indexing is not important for a page to pass juice, who knows - will see
I think you really should give it more time, 6 weeks ago I placed 260 links with high pr society to one of my sites and 40% of them are indexed completely natural. I haven't build a single link to them.
You're absolutely right. My bad
And actually this slow index rate is even better cause its much more natural, especially when you build tons of links like I sometimes do by setting up multiple projects to increase the 20/day limit.
Last week I started work for another seo client of mine btw, he had someone else working on his site for 2 months and he only got at #91 for one of his keywords, it turned out this "scammy" seo guy was charging him heavily for articles created with AMR and a dozen web2.0s + social bookmarks. Then he hired me and within 10 days I got him at #28 for a fairly tough keyword. I boosted his site with 200 highPRsociety posts, 100 web2.0's and 100 ALN posts with dripfeeding set at 20/day. He now hires me on a monthly bases to get him to page 1. This agian shows that quality article distribution in combination with web2.0s is super effective.
Word. I've noticed that for a lot of KWs there are these weird websites sitting on the second page that have a shitload of blog network links and nothing else. The PR juice they have coming in is probably 10 times more than the site sitting at number 1. Still, lack of link variety kills them
New update, 60/100 articles are live right now so we've been dripfeeding for 12 days now. Personally I always give it around 10 days, counted from when the links are build. So the biggest effect still has to come.
5 out of 8 keywords have reached the top 100
Keyword 1: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Keyword 2: Google: 32 - Yahoo: 32 - Bing: 43
Keyword 3: Google: 32 - Yahoo: 43 - Bing: 13
Keyword 4: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Keyword 5: Google: 94 - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Keyword 6: Google: n/a - Yahoo: 73 - Bing: n/a
Keyword 7: Google: n/a - Yahoo: 61 - Bing: n/a
Keyword 8: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Little side note about keyword2: Last report it was ranking as #11 in Bing, but that was due to a mistake of mine cause I accidentally added an S to the keyword. Cause the keyword with the S was in the domainname, example: http://www.telephones.com kw: "telephones", but in fact the keyword he targets is: "telephone" which doesnt rank in Bing but does rank in google and yahoo. Telephone is used as example, it's not the keyword he is after, not even close
5 out of 8 keywords have reached the top 100
Keyword 1: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Keyword 2: Google: 32 - Yahoo: 32 - Bing: 43
Keyword 3: Google: 32 - Yahoo: 43 - Bing: 13
Keyword 4: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Keyword 5: Google: 94 - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Keyword 6: Google: n/a - Yahoo: 73 - Bing: n/a
Keyword 7: Google: n/a - Yahoo: 61 - Bing: n/a
Keyword 8: Google: n/a - Yahoo: n/a - Bing: n/a
Little side note about keyword2: Last report it was ranking as #11 in Bing, but that was due to a mistake of mine cause I accidentally added an S to the keyword. Cause the keyword with the S was in the domainname, example: http://www.telephones.com kw: "telephones", but in fact the keyword he targets is: "telephone" which doesnt rank in Bing but does rank in google and yahoo. Telephone is used as example, it's not the keyword he is after, not even close
Last edited: