[CASE STUDY] Deady SEO's Operation CHAOS for Hard Keywords
- Thread starter TheMatrix
- Start date
RidiculeMe
Newbie
- Feb 4, 2012
- 34
- 2
that's freakin nice! I too, bought a chaos package and still waiting for results. Glad to see your ranking improved SIGNIFICANTLY. Though, as of 3 days, still no results (though i wouldn't expect it to move anywhere that fast yet).
TheMatrix
BANNED
- Dec 20, 2008
- 3,439
- 7,401
I think I've mentioned it quite a few times, but again, NO. I have not done any backlinking on these pages, or these keywords.
ohaider
Senior Member
- Jul 28, 2011
- 819
- 428
Don't rage bro. I skimmed through your posts checking out your SERP results. I noticed that most of the changes happened about two to three weeks after the service should have been done (You said it takes 16-18 days I believe). I didn't know whether you had begun to build more links or not.
TheMatrix
BANNED
- Dec 20, 2008
- 3,439
- 7,401
I have not received any notification for the status of the campaign.
It's been ~40 days, and I've not yet received the complete report.
khaldoun83
Newbie
- Jan 6, 2012
- 43
- 2
Anyone knows here a service at BHW for advanced on page optimization
just open a thread and ask the question, unlikely you will find it here
@ OP what has happened to the second KW?
TheMatrix
BANNED
- Dec 20, 2008
- 3,439
- 7,401
Corrupt
BANNED
- Sep 15, 2011
- 805
- 413
Is your second website deindexed or just suffering from a google dance?
Btw, Get Rank checker, I also used to use TT4 but Rank Checker is much more faster for checking the rankings. The enterprise licence is shared for free http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/member-downloads/315918-get-search-engine-optimization-power-suite-enterprise-edition-working.html
Btw, Get Rank checker, I also used to use TT4 but Rank Checker is much more faster for checking the rankings. The enterprise licence is shared for free http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/member-downloads/315918-get-search-engine-optimization-power-suite-enterprise-edition-working.html
TheMatrix
BANNED
- Dec 20, 2008
- 3,439
- 7,401
Yeah, I have the complete SEO PowerSuite with me. But prefer TT since it gives more insights for my project.
And no, it's not deindexed, just lost in some pages..
D
Deleted member 17472
Guest
Your second website is dancing heavily, Which is not normal at all.
TheMatrix
BANNED
- Dec 20, 2008
- 3,439
- 7,401
Yes, mate.. And I'm not happy with it.
It's been over 45 days since the campaign started, and I have no clue whether it's done or no..
Isn't it obvious?
It is to me, and I am sure it is to you, too
You make a "case study" thread. Great! I love them!
Then I realise it's a live case study, not one that was already done. Okay, not too much of a problem..
Then, the PROVIDER of the service in question replies to the thread. Now we KNOW he is watching it. Things are now becoming a little unreliable, in the sense of an 'unbiased case study'. I am not saying you, as the OP are biased - but we have now given the service provider free public advertising, where he has the opportunity to 'ensure' the campaign works well.
Given that we know he has his own personal interests to protect - AS WELL AS the report not being delivered for 40 days, when the ETA is 13-16 days.. I think it is "safe" to say that the only real case study here is about how service providers will go to extreme lengths when their service is put on public display.
I am sorry, but the case study really did end when the provider saw the thread. Seriously, your site is dancing for over 40 days... it sounds like link building efforts are obviously STILL going on to this day for that to be happening. SERP's don't bounce around for 40 days if you stop building links. They will eventually stop, somewhere.
So links are obviously still being built up or the Tier 2's are being hammered or whatever - and quite obviously the service provider isn't going to be working for 40 days on each of his clients projects...
Anyway, that's just my opinion. You can take it as you will.
PS: Personally, although the diagram in the OP was dressed up to look good - (I had a really quick glance at it) it looked like there were quite simply way too many links pointing directly to 1 or 2 URL's for it to be effective. I am not sure how you've set it up Matrix, but we can't shower a small portion of the site in links, and other pages with nothing. I am sure you know this, but perhaps this is what has happened in this case.
Nothing against you, because I follow along your posts and threads and receive them well - I just feel in this case, the public eye has been deceived by the service provider. Just an opinion, again.
Last edited:
- Apr 25, 2011
- 19,848
- 28,296
To me it just shows there are lots of factors involved in ranking a site - just because you use a service like Deadly Seo, doesnt ensure your site will rank.
I think entris service is great, communication could be slightly better, but otherwise it's a good service. I will definitely use again, maybe next time il buy through a 3rd party then do a case study
I think entris service is great, communication could be slightly better, but otherwise it's a good service. I will definitely use again, maybe next time il buy through a 3rd party then do a case study
entri3
Elite Member
- Mar 26, 2008
- 1,905
- 418
No worries,
Over the last months the dance style has become like this,
When you do campaigns for a new site, it usually comes into the top 10 & then out of the top 100 & then continuing the campaign again gets it into top 10 permanently ( almost ).
So, NORMAL & no worries. ( The campaign is completed & i'll have the reports mailed to you ). Regarding the second site you'll have to continue with alternate campaigns to get it into the top 5 ( don't stop ).
That makes no sense. I was informed that he's been doing a case study on my service & the same link campaigns & types we use for others is being worked on this site. NOTHING SPECIAL. It's natural that whatever's being done, there'll always be people who doubt it. They have to answer themself.
If still too much curios, then ask OP abt his domain name's majestic SEO report & that'll reveal 90% of the links & then you can compare with CHAOS.
Regarding the time frame it has been mentioned TON times that the campaign takes more time than expected. ( We build links very slowly than you can imagine, which is what makes our results very stable ). The campaign was completed a few days back & though it's not 13-16 days, it's very clear that we work based on the response in rankings/dance/site age/keywords & other stuff. The speed varies from site to site.
So saying it again, there are people who always think in the other aspect, what if this service provider takes special care of this case study? what if he pays for this? what if this is not real? and all kind of imaginations & that can be answered by you & you alone.
Over the last months the dance style has become like this,
When you do campaigns for a new site, it usually comes into the top 10 & then out of the top 100 & then continuing the campaign again gets it into top 10 permanently ( almost ).
So, NORMAL & no worries. ( The campaign is completed & i'll have the reports mailed to you ). Regarding the second site you'll have to continue with alternate campaigns to get it into the top 5 ( don't stop ).
That makes no sense. I was informed that he's been doing a case study on my service & the same link campaigns & types we use for others is being worked on this site. NOTHING SPECIAL. It's natural that whatever's being done, there'll always be people who doubt it. They have to answer themself.
If still too much curios, then ask OP abt his domain name's majestic SEO report & that'll reveal 90% of the links & then you can compare with CHAOS.
Regarding the time frame it has been mentioned TON times that the campaign takes more time than expected. ( We build links very slowly than you can imagine, which is what makes our results very stable ). The campaign was completed a few days back & though it's not 13-16 days, it's very clear that we work based on the response in rankings/dance/site age/keywords & other stuff. The speed varies from site to site.
So saying it again, there are people who always think in the other aspect, what if this service provider takes special care of this case study? what if he pays for this? what if this is not real? and all kind of imaginations & that can be answered by you & you alone.
Isn't it obvious?
It is to me, and I am sure it is to you, too
You make a "case study" thread. Great! I love them!
Then I realise it's a live case study, not one that was already done. Okay, not too much of a problem..
Then, the PROVIDER of the service in question replies to the thread. Now we KNOW he is watching it. Things are now becoming a little unreliable, in the sense of an 'unbiased case study'. I am not saying you, as the OP are biased - but we have now given the service provider free public advertising, where he has the opportunity to 'ensure' the campaign works well.
Given that we know he has his own personal interests to protect - AS WELL AS the report not being delivered for 40 days, when the ETA is 13-16 days.. I think it is "safe" to say that the only real case study here is about how service providers will go to extreme lengths when their service is put on public display.
I am sorry, but the case study really did end when the provider saw the thread. Seriously, your site is dancing for over 40 days... it sounds like link building efforts are obviously STILL going on to this day for that to be happening. SERP's don't bounce around for 40 days if you stop building links. They will eventually stop, somewhere.
So links are obviously still being built up or the Tier 2's are being hammered or whatever - and quite obviously the service provider isn't going to be working for 40 days on each of his clients projects...
Anyway, that's just my opinion. You can take it as you will.
PS: Personally, although the diagram in the OP was dressed up to look good - (I had a really quick glance at it) it looked like there were quite simply way too many links pointing directly to 1 or 2 URL's for it to be effective. I am not sure how you've set it up Matrix, but we can't shower a small portion of the site in links, and other pages with nothing. I am sure you know this, but perhaps this is what has happened in this case.
Nothing against you, because I follow along your posts and threads and receive them well - I just feel in this case, the public eye has been deceived by the service provider. Just an opinion, again.
Isn't it obvious?
It is to me, and I am sure it is to you, too
You make a "case study" thread. Great! I love them!
Then I realise it's a live case study, not one that was already done. Okay, not too much of a problem..
Then, the PROVIDER of the service in question replies to the thread. Now we KNOW he is watching it. Things are now becoming a little unreliable, in the sense of an 'unbiased case study'. I am not saying you, as the OP are biased - but we have now given the service provider free public advertising, where he has the opportunity to 'ensure' the campaign works well.
Given that we know he has his own personal interests to protect - AS WELL AS the report not being delivered for 40 days, when the ETA is 13-16 days.. I think it is "safe" to say that the only real case study here is about how service providers will go to extreme lengths when their service is put on public display.
I am sorry, but the case study really did end when the provider saw the thread. Seriously, your site is dancing for over 40 days... it sounds like link building efforts are obviously STILL going on to this day for that to be happening. SERP's don't bounce around for 40 days if you stop building links. They will eventually stop, somewhere.
So links are obviously still being built up or the Tier 2's are being hammered or whatever - and quite obviously the service provider isn't going to be working for 40 days on each of his clients projects...
Anyway, that's just my opinion. You can take it as you will.
PS: Personally, although the diagram in the OP was dressed up to look good - (I had a really quick glance at it) it looked like there were quite simply way too many links pointing directly to 1 or 2 URL's for it to be effective. I am not sure how you've set it up Matrix, but we can't shower a small portion of the site in links, and other pages with nothing. I am sure you know this, but perhaps this is what has happened in this case.
Nothing against you, because I follow along your posts and threads and receive them well - I just feel in this case, the public eye has been deceived by the service provider. Just an opinion, again.
Agree. I was thinking the same when reading the posts
Thanks for your reply.
Please understand that I am not getting any entertainment out of my replies on this thread. I am genuinely interested in case studies that provide legitimate value.
You say my post made no sense - yet it is your reply which made no sense. Matrix has said many, many times in this thread that he has not received any report at all. He also said the service is to last approx. 16 days at a maximum.
The 16 days was not something HE made up from thin air. He got it from your BST. So why do you come here now, telling me that my post doesn't make sense, when all I was doing was pointing out the obvious.
Your time frame, as stipulated by your own self, is 16 days. You then come here and act like I am not making a valid point, when The Matrix hasn't received a report after 40 days?
In case you did not notice, that's almost 3 times the expected time frame for delivery. You can't come in here and pretend I am being ridiculous when all I am doing is voicing what other members are likely thinking.
It's all fun and easy to say "check the links" but we all know that's not going to give us a complete picture of the entire story.
In the end, I have nothing against you. I would try and make the public review as good as possible also if it was my service on show. But it just seems that iris blatantly obvious that something "uncommon" is going on here when the service is taking 3 x longer than usual and no sign of any update or any report (until now).
Please understand that I am not getting any entertainment out of my replies on this thread. I am genuinely interested in case studies that provide legitimate value.
You say my post made no sense - yet it is your reply which made no sense. Matrix has said many, many times in this thread that he has not received any report at all. He also said the service is to last approx. 16 days at a maximum.
The 16 days was not something HE made up from thin air. He got it from your BST. So why do you come here now, telling me that my post doesn't make sense, when all I was doing was pointing out the obvious.
Your time frame, as stipulated by your own self, is 16 days. You then come here and act like I am not making a valid point, when The Matrix hasn't received a report after 40 days?
In case you did not notice, that's almost 3 times the expected time frame for delivery. You can't come in here and pretend I am being ridiculous when all I am doing is voicing what other members are likely thinking.
It's all fun and easy to say "check the links" but we all know that's not going to give us a complete picture of the entire story.
In the end, I have nothing against you. I would try and make the public review as good as possible also if it was my service on show. But it just seems that iris blatantly obvious that something "uncommon" is going on here when the service is taking 3 x longer than usual and no sign of any update or any report (until now).
That makes no sense. I was informed that he's been doing a case study on my service & the same link campaigns & types we use for others is being worked on this site. NOTHING SPECIAL. It's natural that whatever's being done, there'll always be people who doubt it. They have to answer themself.
If still too much curios, then ask OP abt his domain name's majestic SEO report & that'll reveal 90% of the links & then you can compare with CHAOS.
Regarding the time frame it has been mentioned TON times that the campaign takes more time than expected. ( We build links very slowly than you can imagine, which is what makes our results very stable ). The campaign was completed a few days back & though it's not 13-16 days, it's very clear that we work based on the response in rankings/dance/site age/keywords & other stuff. The speed varies from site to site.
So saying it again, there are people who always think in the other aspect, what if this service provider takes special care of this case study? what if he pays for this? what if this is not real? and all kind of imaginations & that can be answered by you & you alone.