Can being hated be profitable?

IamScammer

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2023
Messages
230
Reaction score
1,021
For example, if I create a YT video ''7 reasons why Trump sucks'' and post it on a FB group of Trump supporters...I will get a lot of hits, dislikes and negative comments. Can this be positive at some point or will it simply give bad impressions to Youtube?
 
In that example you've got TDS sufferers who will actively click watch and like your content.

Stirring controversy is always profitable just look at Andrew Tate he's very much a Marmite character.
 
Why dont you post 7 reasons to love trump to a pro trump group? Or is that too much of an obvious money maker you'd prefer to go against the grain? :)
 
Being completely hated, no you wont make money.

Have a clear side which you are standing on and have like-minded people flock around you and yes.
 
Hello!

In the realm of social media marketing and video content, engagement can indeed be a complicated matter. While it's true that activity (including dislikes and negative comments) does indicate engagement and may increase visibility according to algorithms, the type and quality of engagement are equally, if not more important for long-term success.

Sharing a video with an audience that will likely react negatively might initially increase hits or views, but here are a few potential downsides:

1. **Audience Retention**: Negative reactions often coincide with low audience retention. If people dislike the content and stop watching after a few seconds, this could signal to YouTube’s algorithm that the video might not be of high quality or not satisfying users, which could hurt its suggestion potential.

2. **Ratio of Likes to Dislikes**: While YouTube has removed public dislike counts as of November 2021 (as per my last knowledge update in September 2021), a content creator can still see this metric, and it’s likely that the algorithm may still consider this in the video’s overall performance.

3. **Comments**: Negative comments can create a hostile environment that can dissuade positive engagement from other viewers. It can also impact how viewers perceive your channel.

4. **Long Term Growth**: Building a reputation for controversial or antagonistic content might drive some short term traffic, but it can be detrimental to building a loyal and engaged audience in the long run.

5. **Future Partnerships or Monetization**: Content that is controversial or brings negative attention can also limit opportunities for partnerships, sponsorships, and advertising. Advertisers generally prefer to put their ads on content that is brand-safe.

So, while at first glance the strategy of throwing in controversy might seem like a quick way to increase views, the potential drawbacks usually outweigh the benefits. A balanced approach to generating engagement — creating valuable, shareable content and fostering a positive community around your channel will tend to yield better results over the long term.

I hope this helps and gives some clarity! Feel free to ask if you have more questions.

Best of luck with your YouTube journey!

Best,
These gpt-3 replies are rampant lately.
 
Why dont you post 7 reasons to love trump to a pro trump group? Or is that too much of an obvious money maker you'd prefer to go against the grain? :)
because it will just be another guy loving him, nothing different there, it doesn't grab attention
 
yes being hated can make money but they will also dovote your videos and things like that. Take a look at Andrew Tate, Jake Paul, Logan Paul etc. Being polarizing has always gained a lot of traffic you just also have to be loved by another side.
 
Appreciate it guys...I believe it's almost impossible to be hated by everyone, at least if you have a solid point

Maybe I will give it a try
 
maybe change the title to no get the video take down, 7 reason why Trump shouldn't be in politics, mostly to avoid the video to fall in the hate speach hole, but yeah, haters are the best way to get more traffic, the more they hate you the more traffic the generate ;)
I follow a girl on instagram she has a lot of haters the first 20 or 50 comments are only hate but she has tons of followers and interactions besides that haters are te first ones to see your content and drop a comment jajajajjajajaja loyal fans
 
maybe change the title to no get the video take down, 7 reason why Trump shouldn't be in politics, mostly to avoid the video to fall in the hate speach hole, but yeah, haters are the best way to get more traffic, the more they hate you the more traffic the generate ;)
I follow a girl on instagram she has a lot of haters the first 20 or 50 comments are only hate but she has tons of followers and interactions besides that haters are te first ones to see your content and drop a comment jajajajjajajaja loyal fans
You're right...to be honest, several girls dancing on social media receive hate (mainly people saying it's silly and the new generation is garbage) and are popular, that makes sense
 
Of course, it can make money. It really depends on how you handle these "haters", and it also depends on where you redirect them!
 
Being completely hated, no you wont make money.

Have a clear side which you are standing on and have like-minded people flock around you and yes.
it's good thing to attract haters first, andrew tate did that as well, said some abrupt and moronic stuff, trolled too much to et al ot of haters. Haters are always louder than the fans, then fans came to h im naturally easily.
 
You may consider adjusting the title if you are going to use it on YouTube. It sounds too harsh.
Something like "7 hidden things about Trump that the world does not know about"
 
In provocative titles, one must always keep a balance
 
Being hated doesn't pay on it's own, building up enough engagement for a social algorithm to push your content and expand your audience does.

Rage baiting is quite normal in the press and has been since yellow journalism and old printed newspaper headlines.

Humans react remarkably harshly to things they don't like. Everybody is mentioning Tate here without going into why what he did worked.

Tate even said it himself, he'd say something that most people would agree with, but say it in a way that would make it sound disagreeable. "Women are weak" instead of "men are stronger than women". He knew that the women would engage with the content out of anger, but the men would usually agree with that message, regardless.

Guys like Jake Paul and Floyd Mayweather even do it... Mayweather's manager (Al Haymon) long ago realized that people who hated Mayweather would even pay to see him lose, similar to how racist white people would pay to see Jack Johnson lose. That's why Mayweather played up the "Money Mayweather" image so much.

While I've never spent time with Mayweather, I've spent time with Don King and the WBC team and they said that Mayweather would flash the cash for press in a nightclub, but then spend on a debit card while being sober the whole night.

In the politically conservative social media circles you have guys building entire careers rage baiting conservatives while agreeing with them: Miles Cheong & Liberals of TikTok. You can also go the other route and deliberately provoke, like "Just Pearly Things".
 
Back
Top