Is it better to make 20-30 web 2.0 properties and build backlinks to them rather than make 20-30 web properties every few days? For users using Senuke, your just recreating the same properties over and over again. Doesnt it make more sense to make 20-30 good ones and BL to all of them?
Building web 2.0 properties consistently?
- Thread starter jerzydawg
- Start date
I want to know about that too.
One thing I just noticed is that is very hard for YSE to pick up my backlinks generated through senuke (I know it has nothing to do with senuke itself) but I have a list of 100 web 2.0 properties with a link to my money page that does not get picked up no matter what.
I ping them everyday, also create RSS feeds and submit, but nothing. (sorry I do not want to hijack your thread)
One thing I just noticed is that is very hard for YSE to pick up my backlinks generated through senuke (I know it has nothing to do with senuke itself) but I have a list of 100 web 2.0 properties with a link to my money page that does not get picked up no matter what.
I ping them everyday, also create RSS feeds and submit, but nothing. (sorry I do not want to hijack your thread)
GrizzlyAdams
Regular Member
- Feb 17, 2011
- 478
- 406
People use senuke once for each site simply to build those properties quickly. Then another tool like xrumer or scrapebox to add backlinks to those properties.
Yes, I know but is there any affect on creating duplicate web 2.0 properties?
What I think OP wants to know is if we have to build like 40 properties one time only and blast them or build 40 properties more than one time (maybe once a week) and blast them. Am I correct?
I do use senuke but I am just starting, want to know that too.
I do use senuke but I am just starting, want to know that too.
xbox360gurl70s
Elite Member
- Sep 28, 2008
- 1,532
- 355
its best to have a solid base of web2.0 properties with 2-5 post in them and around 1-2 articles that has you promoting your brand or site. it gets to stay longer [some forever until that properties close down like friendster]
then you can treat them like a normal domain and build backlinks to them too.
the results are far more better this way
then you can treat them like a normal domain and build backlinks to them too.
the results are far more better this way
citylightz
Registered Member
- Oct 13, 2010
- 88
- 20
But if you build say thirty web 2.0 sites, are you then spreading the same posts on to each one?
I would imagine that you are spinning each post, is that correct?
How do you come up with so much content and how unique does it need to be?
Thanks!
I would imagine that you are spinning each post, is that correct?
How do you come up with so much content and how unique does it need to be?
Thanks!
The best way to go forward is build a long list of web 2.0 sites and then keep creating fresh content on them frequently, may be once in a fortnight or so, make the articles unique by spinning it to at least make it 50% unique, then build backlinks to your web 2.0 properties, it is pretty much easier to build backlinks to your web 2.0 properties, few signature links in profiles of forums can do wonders as it helps in getting the properties crawled. The more stronger and aged these properties get, you dont even need to build any backlinks to it.
midnight_focus
BANNED
- Dec 2, 2008
- 781
- 481
Yes it's very good to have 20-30 high quality web 2.0 that can serve as network around your site