Alright guys, Just thinking I'm going to start building some web 2.0's and article directory submissions to my new site. I was wondering whether all the content needs to be readable or I can just spin and upload and hope for the best? If I make it readable, it could take ages! Cheers!
If you are automating it, I say just spin it (although I hand spin my articles...not one-button spin) If you are doing it manually, I would proof read the spun articles and fix any glaring grammatical errors. Even better if you go back and fix your original spintax once you find an error. Mostly people when they are automating you want quantity over quality. When you are submitting manually you are trying to get some quality backlinks and you want them to stick. The top article directories will manually approve your articles, so crap is hard to get by them. That's just me though. I'm sure other just use 1 button spin and call it a day
I guess you guys scrapebox blast your web 2.0 with spammy sites right? Rather than directly to your money site?
If it takes you ages to write unique content than it is better to outsource it to some good writer who can provide you 20 - 30 100% unique articles that pass the copyscape, you can than use these articles to publish on web 2.0 properties and to article sites. Once all has done, you can blast your web 2.0 properties and articles by bookmarking, RSS, forum profiles and scrapebox comments.
for web2.0 the readability is not important, yet for article directories it can be, anyway, don't do it your self, find a cheap writer, you can outsource that part of work for 10 bucks.
Yeh you need to have readable content nowadays or else Google will just ignore it. Get cheap services or just do it yourself!
