Building LinkPush? Stop and Read - UC LinkPush- My 500th post

Napster,

If my anchor text is lose weight quickly why should I not be using using that anchor text for all tiers of my linkpush? Sure it'll make the tier1 sites rank for my keyword, but they'll rank below my moneysite anyway, so I'm not getting the reasoning here...
 
Advertise on BHW
ladismantler said:
Napster,

If my anchor text is lose weight quickly why should I not be using using that anchor text for all tiers of my linkpush? Sure it'll make the tier1 sites rank for my keyword, but they'll rank below my moneysite anyway, so I'm not getting the reasoning here...
Click to expand...

Because it has happened thet your tier 1 web 2.0 properties might starting to rank even above your money site. And if those properties are spun and/or low quality then this does not look good does it?

Ofcourse if these have quality content then go ahead.
 
Last edited:
ladismantler said:
Napster,

If my anchor text is lose weight quickly why should I not be using using that anchor text for all tiers of my linkpush? Sure it'll make the tier1 sites rank for my keyword, but they'll rank below my moneysite anyway, so I'm not getting the reasoning here...
Click to expand...

The main reason is not because your tier 1 will rank above your money site (though it wont). Its to avoid footprints for G. All links in tier 1 and tier 2 will look suspicious if they have a same keyword.

And one more reason is you dont want to rank your tier 1 for any keyword coz spun articles suck .
 
NapsteR said:
And there is one more thing. Reusing these blogs for another site. this will increase the post counts and link juice.
Hope this helps..
Click to expand...

Can you explain how?

With the same properties, do I make a different post (article post#2 for the same teir1 pointing to another money site backed by same article post#2 tier2s?

Thanks,
Mikey
 
NapsteR said:
The main reason is not because your tier 1 will rank above your money site (though it wont). Its to avoid footprints for G. All links in tier 1 and tier 2 will look suspicious if they have a same keyword.

And one more reason is you dont want to rank your tier 1 for any keyword coz spun articles suck .
Click to expand...

Alright, so you put your anchor text in Tier1 obviously, and for Tier2 the anchor text can be anything??
 
Hey Napster,

Quick question for you.

Did you test the power of small linkpush VS big linkpush?

For example, did you compare the gain in serp for lets say, 3x3 UC Linkpush VS 1x15 Linkpush?

I would be curious to know the result, if result you have. :)

Johnny
 
Napster, how many different 2.0 blog/website providers do you use to make your tier 1 properties?
 
johnnyd77 said:
Hey Napster,

Quick question for you.

Did you test the power of small linkpush VS big linkpush?

For example, did you compare the gain in serp for lets say, 3x3 UC Linkpush VS 1x15 Linkpush?

I would be curious to know the result, if result you have. :)

Johnny
Click to expand...

I'm interested in a answer to this one too ... if anyone can provide some insight.
 
Guys, didn't see this discussed so far:

How many(how fast) web 2.0 blogs - tier 1 should you build for new domains, and how many per day for old domains not to get sandboxed?

This is important...
 
Great bit of info, and thanks a lot for all the detailed answers too, great when a thread is followed up like this, it makes it a valuable resource!
 
johnnyd77 said:
Hey Napster,

Quick question for you.

Did you test the power of small linkpush VS big linkpush?

For example, did you compare the gain in serp for lets say, 3x3 UC Linkpush VS 1x15 Linkpush?

I would be curious to know the result, if result you have. :)

Johnny
Click to expand...

small got good results for me. :) I didnt try longer than 9x9
 
lucescud said:
Guys, didn't see this discussed so far:

How many(how fast) web 2.0 blogs - tier 1 should you build for new domains, and how many per day for old domains not to get sandboxed?

This is important...
Click to expand...

I don't think that you can flip out linkpushes so fast that you can get sandboxed at all. You have to make thousands of tier1 links per day and thens suddenly stop to get sandboxed. So this kind manual or semiautomated link pushing is safe.
 
lucescud said:
Guys, didn't see this discussed so far:

How many(how fast) web 2.0 blogs - tier 1 should you build for new domains, and how many per day for old domains not to get sandboxed?

This is important...
Click to expand...

one or two lps per day is fine...
 
Last edited:
NapsteR,

How well are your results after time? For example, are you finding that you need to keep adding LP's to hold onto your positions or are you finding that once you get to a certain level in the results, you can stop building for a while (30 to 60 days) without losing your rankings?

THanks again for the share!

JC.
 
I am starting to implement this as well. Going for a search of ~27,000 exact per month. Don't have an EMD but KW is in my URL. Right now I am around 150 with on page seo and one or two blog comments. I'll keep you guys updated.

I was going to ask about proxy settings but I use the checker mentioned earlier in the thread, all of my ip addresses came up different, or close enough to different. Should we still use a private proxy though for each new LP, or does it not matter?
 
Last edited:
burrit0 said:
I am starting to implement this as well. Going for a search of ~27,000 exact per month. Don't have an EMD but KW is in my URL. Right now I am around 150 with on page seo and one or two blog comments. I'll keep you guys updated.

I was going to ask about proxy settings but I use the checker mentioned earlier in the thread, all of my ip addresses came up different, or close enough to different. Should we still use a private proxy though for each new LP, or does it not matter?
Click to expand...

I never use proxies and I get very good results.
 
jeancarlin said:
NapsteR,

How well are your results after time? For example, are you finding that you need to keep adding LP's to hold onto your positions or are you finding that once you get to a certain level in the results, you can stop building for a while (30 to 60 days) without losing your rankings?

THanks again for the share!

JC.
Click to expand...

I build links from other sources too. My rankings always sticks..
 
burrit0 said:
I am starting to implement this as well. Going for a search of ~27,000 exact per month. Don't have an EMD but KW is in my URL. Right now I am around 150 with on page seo and one or two blog comments. I'll keep you guys updated.

I was going to ask about proxy settings but I use the checker mentioned earlier in the thread, all of my ip addresses came up different, or close enough to different. Should we still use a private proxy though for each new LP, or does it not matter?
Click to expand...

proxy is mainly used because you dont want your web 20 properties to be deleted. nothin else.
 
Dutch Harry said:
92% unique? then the outcome must be gibberish and yes that is easy to detected by G because they tackled that back in the day when RSSGM adsense sites where so popular and Google advertisers got shitty traffic from shitty sites. Try to make your outcome as readable as possible... i rewrite my articles myself and it takes me about 45 minutes to spin one article of 400 words... but you can be sure that the spins are all readable.

A lot of people just use BS or SC like this, they grab an article and they put it in their software and let the software do the rewriting for them... that is the wrong way because all your output will be shitty, not only will G deindex them also the moderators of most of these sites will delete that crap, making all your efforts useless.

But if you take the time to really spin an article, you will get ranked better, @NapsteR i am not knocking your method because it will definatly work, i am just not agreeing with your statements on the content... that is all.

Good luck with it

Harry
Click to expand...


Question... How does google know if you content is unreadable? Google cannot read, or can it? Maybe in the future google will come up with a way to read the content, but I really find it hard to believe that google will know that the content is unreadable? As long as the spelling is good, shouldn't that be good enough. I understand if people read it and report the blog, but other then that, I have been ranking the shittiest spun garbage that I can :)

What I do is scrape articles for a keyword then take 3-4 articles and take bits of sentences and paragraphs from each and stuff them into one article and then spin the shit out of it. Unique to google, right? I could be totally wrong, someone want to correct me?
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top