1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Buffers site vs 301

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by Martin1971, Jul 21, 2016.

  1. Martin1971

    Martin1971 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2013
    Messages:
    927
    Likes Received:
    292
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Hi,

    I use a lot off buffer site's (feed with sape links) wich works fine, the quistion is will there be more power when i 301 the buffer site to the money site?
     
  2. ficfroc

    ficfroc Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2010
    Messages:
    476
    Likes Received:
    268
    Location:
    Sous Les Etoiles
    There is undoubtly more power that flows to your website when you're using a 301, for the simple reason that all the linkjuice flows directly to your website while if you were using a web2.0 as a buffer there is some linksjuice that is lost throught internal links. However, the web2.0 act as a protection layer against a penalty, that's something you don't have when using a 301.

    My best advice would be to stick with the web2.0. And if your web2.0 allows you to customize the theme, try removing internal links as much as you can (calendar widget, link to the author of the theme etc etc).
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  3. 710fla

    710fla Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2015
    Messages:
    790
    Likes Received:
    227
    The problem with 301 is they can pass penalties along. But they are much more powerful than just linking to your money site.