sircoldfire,
Rehashing, as used in the Internet marketing world, means presenting the work of others as if it were something new, usually without attribution.
I did not present this stuff as something new. I presented it as a summary of what I have studied and stated that I would properly source everything later in the final work.
Just as I thought, though, you do not know what rehashing is. But seeing your enthusiasm for giving advice regarding things where you lack instruction, I do find it believable that--as you said--you do rehashing all the time.
So you know who Cialdini is and what his 6 big triggers are (although there is plenty more in his main book, like sensory contrast, using the word "because," etc.). Big deal. Everyone knows what he wrote, or at least, if you have a minimum interest in copywriting, you should. When I wrote my article, I presumed that most readers would recognize the "positive triggers" as coming from him.
Some Namedropping
Have you studied Sugarman's triggers? Hoghead's fascination triggers? Hanlon's primal triggers? Kunkel's instant appeal triggers? (All that's just for starters...) Or any NLP at all--things like nested loops, embedded commands, pattern interrupt, etc.? How about memes and idea viruses (say from Rushkoff, Joyner and Godin)?
How about just plain old vanilla-flavored storytelling?
I could go on and on about this stuff--and not just namedrop or copypaste--because that's all I study, day in and day out.
But I'll operate from a position of abundance and goodwill. Since I have concluded and verified that you do not know what rehashing is, I will give you a concrete example.
Case Study -- Goobert
Way back when, an Internet marketer named Michael Campbell came up with the Goobert system of blogging. Basically it goes like this:
You blog about a niche topic. You try to write every day. You set Google alerts for pertinent keywords so you will see the latest news and blog posts from all over the web. You post quotes from the ones you like and make comments about them on your blog--giving attribution and linking to the original, of course. This is your main blog material.
Then, when the material you quoted is from a post on another person's blog (and not, say, a news article), you leave a comment on that blog with a backlink--this backlink can go to your home page or to the post you made where you quoted this person's article.
Then you bookmark this person's opening article (where your made your comment). Note: You do not bookmark your own blog and you do not bookmark the comment you left on the other person's blog. You bookmark the opening article.
This way, (1) your bookmarking accounts always show new material that is not by you, (2) the spiders will come first to the opening article, then naturally to your comment, then to your blog, thus making the backlink a high-quality one. And, (3) since you quoted the piece on your blog and commented about it there, Google finds this material highly relevant, so it rewards you with high rankings.
(Note, it is better to write different stuff on your own blog about the quoted material than the comment you make on the other person's blog. Reword it if you are lazy, or actually do some writing. But different is better.)
This was Michael Campbell and his Goobert system. It has proven time and time again to result in floods of highly qualified traffic.
To Rehash or Not To Rehash, That is the Question
Since then, a slew of different-named systems followed that were essentially the same--the more recent ones use the term "content curation." A good example is Nanoblooging by Spaepen or Affiliate Pilot by Baxter. In terms of the core system, these are nothing but rehashes of Michael Campbell's system, albeit with some other stuff thrown in. (Spaepen adds some social marketing to the mix and Baxter does some interesting gray hat things with the blog content itself.
Anyway, that's high-class rehashing. I think we all know what low-class rehashing is.
Now, if you come along, discuss Campbell's system, just like I did, and compare it to other systems, just like I did, that is not rehashing. That is the start of an original book or a report.
Also, if you compile a bunch of information, like I did in the opening article, give your opinion on what works and what does not, or say that the best things you have found are AAA, BBB and CCC, and give descriptions of them, that is not rehashing. That is also the start of an original work.
In short, with rehashing,
you don't have to use your brain. But if you integrate the work of others within a theme of your own making,
you do have to use your brain.
I hope that helps.
Fake It Until You Make It
This is important, so I went off-theme here in this thread. But frankly, it's blowing the hell out of the "BS" motif I constructed.
(btw - Do you know what a motif is?

)
More unsolicited advice. Try to avoid giving advice on matters when all you are doing is faking it to show off.
Busted!
