Bing it On! (Bing vs. Google)

Its just redirects to the Bing website?
 
I didn't know they were still doing this..

You can find threads about it here:

site:blackhatworld.com bingiton
 
Its just redirects to the Bing website?

987.gif
 
I didn't know they were still doing this..

You can find threads about it here:

site:blackhatworld.com bingiton

Ah crap. I tried blackhatworld.com: bing it on. That usually brings them up. Thanks anyway.

Sorry for the repost all.
 
Did you guys notice !blackhatworld no longer works on duckduckgo?
 
Maybe they only had time to copy Google's results in the US/UK.

LOL, could be the reason.

Anyway for those who are redirected to bing like me, here are the landing pages of 3 UK videos that can be accessed from that page:

http://www.bing.com/explore/biouk?mkt=en-gb&form=MBIOST&publ=BGITON&crea=TEXT_MBIOST_BIO3_Left_Homepage_1x1
http://www.bing.com/explore/biouk?mkt=en-gb&form=MBIOST&publ=BGITON&crea=TEXT_MBIOST_BIO3_Middle_Translator_1x1
http://www.bing.com/explore/biouk?mkt=en-gb&form=MBIOST&publ=BGITON&crea=TEXT_MBIOST_BIO3_Right_VideoPreview_1x1
 
Its just redirects to the Bing website?

You're not in the USA that's why.

Another bing fail at gaining market share on the big G

Bing controls 31% of the US search market, not sure what you're talking about (at their low, they controlled less than 4%).

Bing and Google's results are 180 degrees different, and one could argue that their product searches are now *way* better than Google's after Google shopping became paid.

Bing also gives you free shit for using it, which is why it's my default engine now (yes I still market and rank on Google namely). http://www.bing.com/explore/rewards. Everyone appears to be biased against Bing, but their results are actually great since mid 2012 when they changed their engine. They're *much* better for local listings than Google, for example.
 
Last edited:
Their "study" was based on around 1k people only so very statistically significant...
Anyways they suggested the keywords whre Bing did look way better than the Google Ads plastered results etc. However when ppl used their own terms it was basically a tie or sth along those lines.
 
Their "study" was based on around 1k people only so very statistically significant...
Anyways they suggested the keywords whre Bing did look way better than the Google Ads plastered results etc. However when ppl used their own terms it was basically a tie or sth along those lines.

I see you've never taken a statistics course. 1000 people has a less than 5% uncertainty. If you want to insult their methodology, that's another issue entirely.
 
I cant access the page either.It just redirects to bing.com
 
A good read here:
Microsoft, Yale Professor Spar Over 'Bing It On' Campaign

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2425255,00.asp

The Yale professor's sample consisted nearly entirely of students I believe, which is pretty dubious considering the generational gap in preferences and familiarity with Google results (it's easy to spot Google if you're familiar with them). It also was conducted a year after the original Bingiton study, after google had changed their algorithm with no fewer than 5 very large updates.

In fact, merely by knowing how google displays "news for keyword" rather than the large picture way Bing does, you can easily identify Google results on every search in the "challenge". The only fair challenge is organic results actually listed IMO, and see who has better results.
 
Last edited:
I dont know , but I like the idea. Google sucks with all these updates...fk them
 
Back
Top