Beware of Payment Processing JVs. Don't get scammed.

bornformoney

Supreme Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2011
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
1,686
Hello all, as I'm getting more accustomed to the forum after nearly a decade, I see a sharp rise in some particular kind of JVs that are very troubling for unsuspecting users. Figured I'd share some of my insights on the topic and save you from a world of headache.

Credit to @TheMarquis as he suggested I share this with the community.

Let's dive in. Payment processing JVs might seem very lucrative on the surface but beneath that they can ruin your chances of ever owning a business. Here's why.

One of the primary problems with such JVs is Chargebacks. You have no idea on the origination of transaction. Over the years both Visa and MC have gotten stricter on their chargeback grading. MC especially has been stricter on merchants. When someone tells you the chargebacks are between 1% to 5%, it's more like 4% to 10% over a period of 90 - 120 days.

That means, for the transaction that you process today, on behalf of someone you just met online, you carry the liability for months to come, while they're getting paid within 2 days. There's no middle ground here UNLESS they share the entire customer info with you, sale origination point, and that you can call the customer, and get it in writing that they've purchased what the merchant is saying to you.

Additionally, you may feel to swallow the chargeback losses against your potential profits, but that's only half the picture. We've still unaccounted for chargeback fees, and any other fines you may potentially face. On top of this, especially if you're asked for a Stripe account, just don't even bother. Stripe will flag the transaction in under a week and you'll be stuck in a tough position. If you pay out your JV partner, you're still liable to Stripe for months to come, OR if you chose to hold onto the funds, you're liable to your JV partner, and they may not be liquid enough to fulfill the product/services. That means the transaction will result in a chargeback.

You're losing either way.

A rule of thumb, and this varies slightly depending on the type of processor - but chargebacks overall shouldn't be exceeding over 1%. They expect you to be around 50-70 bsp (basis points). 100 basis points = 1%.

And this isn't a rule just for the merchants. This goes for the processors too. Processors mitigate this with a ton of "low risk" retail transactions to balance their overall numbers. Card brands have also caught onto to this and now they exclusively monitor high risk transactions. I know this because I was in the payments industry for a few years (will share in my journey threads), and have seen quite a bit of it. Processing rules vary both domestically and INTL among processors, aggregators, Payfacs, and other ISOs.

Read up about the Merrick bank's fiasco and what resulted upon it and you'll understand the big picture.

So what's the solution? Proceed with caution.

Know your partner well. Are they who they're saying they are? Can you or one of your representatives meet them in person and verify the operation? Where's the accountability. Only then you may venture in. BH Payment processing is a slippery slope, before you realize it, you may be committing a dozen offences — ranging from transaction tumbling to wire fraud. The latter carries one of the toughest sentences.

Don't deal with Stripe or other Payfacs, instead opt for a legitimate processor that understand the high risk processing business. Reason is they'll be equipped with tools like RDR (Rapid dispute resolution), and a few other Visa/MC tools available to high risk merchants. This mitigates your liability to some extent, but you're still on the hook.

Feel free to ask any questions in this thread on this topic. I'm well familiar with everything from being a merchant, all the way to becoming a direct acquirer with Visa/MC.
 
Hello all, as I'm getting more accustomed to the forum after nearly a decade, I see a sharp rise in some particular kind of JVs that are very troubling for unsuspecting users. Figured I'd share some of my insights on the topic and save you from a world of headache.

Credit to @TheMarquis as he suggested I share this with the community.

Let's dive in. Payment processing JVs might seem very lucrative on the surface but beneath that they can ruin your chances of ever owning a business. Here's why.

One of the primary problems with such JVs is Chargebacks. You have no idea on the origination of transaction. Over the years both Visa and MC have gotten stricter on their chargeback grading. MC especially has been stricter on merchants. When someone tells you the chargebacks are between 1% to 5%, it's more like 4% to 10% over a period of 90 - 120 days.

That means, for the transaction that you process today, on behalf of someone you just met online, you carry the liability for months to come, while they're getting paid within 2 days. There's no middle ground here UNLESS they share the entire customer info with you, sale origination point, and that you can call the customer, and get it in writing that they've purchased what the merchant is saying to you.

Additionally, you may feel to swallow the chargeback losses against your potential profits, but that's only half the picture. We've still unaccounted for chargeback fees, and any other fines you may potentially face. On top of this, especially if you're asked for a Stripe account, just don't even bother. Stripe will flag the transaction in under a week and you'll be stuck in a tough position. If you pay out your JV partner, you're still liable to Stripe for months to come, OR if you chose to hold onto the funds, you're liable to your JV partner, and they may not be liquid enough to fulfill the product/services. That means the transaction will result in a chargeback.

You're losing either way.

A rule of thumb, and this varies slightly depending on the type of processor - but chargebacks overall shouldn't be exceeding over 1%. They expect you to be around 50-70 bsp (basis points). 100 basis points = 1%.

And this isn't a rule just for the merchants. This goes for the processors too. Processors mitigate this with a ton of "low risk" retail transactions to balance their overall numbers. Card brands have also caught onto to this and now they exclusively monitor high risk transactions. I know this because I was in the payments industry for a few years (will share in my journey threads), and have seen quite a bit of it. Processing rules vary both domestically and INTL among processors, aggregators, Payfacs, and other ISOs.

Read up about the Merrick bank's fiasco and what resulted upon it and you'll understand the big picture.

So what's the solution? Proceed with caution.

Know your partner well. Are they who they're saying they are? Can you or one of your representatives meet them in person and verify the operation? Where's the accountability. Only then you may venture in. BH Payment processing is a slippery slope, before you realize it, you may be committing a dozen offences — ranging from transaction tumbling to wire fraud. The latter carries one of the toughest sentences.

Don't deal with Stripe or other Payfacs, instead opt for a legitimate processor that understand the high risk processing business. Reason is they'll be equipped with tools like RDR (Rapid dispute resolution), and a few other Visa/MC tools available to high risk merchants. This mitigates your liability to some extent, but you're still on the hook.

Feel free to ask any questions in this thread on this topic. I'm well familiar with everything from being a merchant, all the way to becoming a direct acquirer with Visa/MC.
Thanks for letting us know.

What are some good payment processors for high risk businesses in your opinion/experience?
 
Thanks for letting us know.

What are some good payment processors for high risk businesses in your opinion/experience?
There have been some consolidations among all the major players. It's not just about who looks "good" on paper, but with who you can work closely. Next, it depends on your vertical and billing model.

Paysafe and Worldline I'd still recommend depending on your geo. You may not get any "whiteglove" service from them unless you're pushing $1MM/month in volume.
 
Hello all, as I'm getting more accustomed to the forum after nearly a decade, I see a sharp rise in some particular kind of JVs that are very troubling for unsuspecting users. Figured I'd share some of my insights on the topic and save you from a world of headache.

Credit to @TheMarquis as he suggested I share this with the community.

Let's dive in. Payment processing JVs might seem very lucrative on the surface but beneath that they can ruin your chances of ever owning a business. Here's why.

One of the primary problems with such JVs is Chargebacks. You have no idea on the origination of transaction. Over the years both Visa and MC have gotten stricter on their chargeback grading. MC especially has been stricter on merchants. When someone tells you the chargebacks are between 1% to 5%, it's more like 4% to 10% over a period of 90 - 120 days.

That means, for the transaction that you process today, on behalf of someone you just met online, you carry the liability for months to come, while they're getting paid within 2 days. There's no middle ground here UNLESS they share the entire customer info with you, sale origination point, and that you can call the customer, and get it in writing that they've purchased what the merchant is saying to you.

Additionally, you may feel to swallow the chargeback losses against your potential profits, but that's only half the picture. We've still unaccounted for chargeback fees, and any other fines you may potentially face. On top of this, especially if you're asked for a Stripe account, just don't even bother. Stripe will flag the transaction in under a week and you'll be stuck in a tough position. If you pay out your JV partner, you're still liable to Stripe for months to come, OR if you chose to hold onto the funds, you're liable to your JV partner, and they may not be liquid enough to fulfill the product/services. That means the transaction will result in a chargeback.

You're losing either way.

A rule of thumb, and this varies slightly depending on the type of processor - but chargebacks overall shouldn't be exceeding over 1%. They expect you to be around 50-70 bsp (basis points). 100 basis points = 1%.

And this isn't a rule just for the merchants. This goes for the processors too. Processors mitigate this with a ton of "low risk" retail transactions to balance their overall numbers. Card brands have also caught onto to this and now they exclusively monitor high risk transactions. I know this because I was in the payments industry for a few years (will share in my journey threads), and have seen quite a bit of it. Processing rules vary both domestically and INTL among processors, aggregators, Payfacs, and other ISOs.

Read up about the Merrick bank's fiasco and what resulted upon it and you'll understand the big picture.

So what's the solution? Proceed with caution.

Know your partner well. Are they who they're saying they are? Can you or one of your representatives meet them in person and verify the operation? Where's the accountability. Only then you may venture in. BH Payment processing is a slippery slope, before you realize it, you may be committing a dozen offences — ranging from transaction tumbling to wire fraud. The latter carries one of the toughest sentences.

Don't deal with Stripe or other Payfacs, instead opt for a legitimate processor that understand the high risk processing business. Reason is they'll be equipped with tools like RDR (Rapid dispute resolution), and a few other Visa/MC tools available to high risk merchants. This mitigates your liability to some extent, but you're still on the hook.

Feel free to ask any questions in this thread on this topic. I'm well familiar with everything from being a merchant, all the way to becoming a direct acquirer with Visa/MC.
Hey so i will start selling ebooks on paypal/cc/crypto, cc is w stripe, should iexcept 4-10% chargeback as you said that's average or??
 
Too right.

There was a situation in my country where scammers approach people and tell them to go joint partners in a business. The unsuspecting person will be directed to set up a business (their name only) and to obtain a merchant gateway - whether a physical machine, or an account with stripe etc. Once this is set up and given to the scammers, they will then process stolen cards through the gateway.

Ultimately, these are eventually shut down but the individual who registered the payment processor was held liable for the chargebacks and almost got charged for using stolen cards, the only reason it was dropped is because a lawyer decide to help them pro-bono and was able to prove to the court they were a genuine victim of scam.
 
Hey so i will start selling ebooks on paypal/cc/crypto, cc is w stripe, should iexcept 4-10% chargeback as you said that's average or??
The average for this type of activity, compared to the average the one who opened the JV said. Claiming 1-5% is equivalent to 4-10% in reality.
 
Hey so i will start selling ebooks on paypal/cc/crypto, cc is w stripe, should iexcept 4-10% chargeback as you said that's average or??
Ah no, I was referring to another thread I saw in the JV section. I just didn't want to link it or give more exposure.

In your case, your traffic source and marketing material would initially determine your chargeback %.
Next comes your fulfillment / customer service timelines.

I think'll be fine unless your ebook has a bunch of gobbledegook lol. :D
 
BHW rule # 3.3 " mentions that "Activity that involves Currency Trades or Exchanges", is a rules violation.
My logic is that a JV which relates to payment processing is also logically nothing but a currency trades or exchange, because the OP of such a type of JV, would state something like "You receive payments for my business me via your Stripe, etc account and you pass that on to me via bank transfer, etc and you can take X% as your fee for your help" ... All the JVs related to payment processing, are in that or very similar fashion and it is so obviously nothing but currency trades or exchanges and ideally these need to trigger BHW rule # 3.3, in my logic.

Anyways, whatever is happening in this regard, is pretty good, as gradually, many sellers of digital virtual non-physical products, will be waking up from their sleep and realize that the solution to their payment processing challenges, is to embrace crypto.
My prediction is that in the next 5 to 6 years, we will no longer see sellers of digital virtual non-physical products accepting Paypal, Stripe, cards, etc and all of them will be accepting only crypto. Ofcourse, the exceptions being the big companies / the big brands, as Paypal, Stripe, card processors do not and will not f__k around with the big companies / the big brands, as they are all hand-in-glove with their scientific ways looting.
 
Last edited:
Thank you bro! This thread will save a lot of people from troubles. The regular John Doe, blinded by the potential big $%% profit (without too much work, and very quick, as the scammers tends to mislead with this thing), can easily fall into such a trap, especially if he/she have financial issues.
 
I feel that both sides needs to actually be careful.
You gave an example of one side.

What about the fact that the guy got 100% control over the funds that are getting into his account. If one day the guy decides that the agreement is not to his liking than he just takes the funds and leaves.
And sometimes we are talking about 5-6 figures.
 
Back
Top