beware gsrcaper

2 cents from me (because everyone says Gscraper is not working). Every user of Gscraper can use any Gscraper version from 1.x.x.x to 1.3.x.x. Some Gscraper versions are still working more than good and here is proof (screenshot from today):




Hawke have low quality support, his thread is abandoned but everyone who says "i cant get Gscraper working" simply dont know what versions he should use and with what proxies. My screenshot is clear proof its possible to harvest with Gscraper with high LPM, hopefully this is enough to prove @proxygo is not 100 % right telling that Gscraper is broken.

my thanks to old salt, appreciated, and to satyre i have tried several versions
from 1.2.9 - 1.3.6 and very little works, and as many people have the same
issues little to no scraping, why dont share with us the version you have
working that we cant find. see i use to get this all the time



now all i get and so do many others is this

+1 Gscraper is not working at all, not only for scraping but other features seems to be broken as well..

satyr85 said:

2 cents from me (because everyone says Gscraper is not working). Every user of Gscraper can use any Gscraper version from 1.x.x.x to 1.3.x.x. Some Gscraper versions are still working more than good and here is proof (screenshot from today):

Hawke have low quality support, his thread is abandoned but everyone who says "i cant get Gscraper working" simply dont know what versions he should use and with what proxies. My screenshot is clear proof its possible to harvest with Gscraper with high LPM, hopefully this is enough to prove @proxygo is not 100 % right telling that Gscraper is broken.

Click to expand...

Care to share the version?
I bet it wouldnt hurt at all.

satyr85 said:

2 cents from me (because everyone says Gscraper is not working). Every user of Gscraper can use any Gscraper version from 1.x.x.x to 1.3.x.x. Some Gscraper versions are still working more than good and here is proof (screenshot from today):

Hawke have low quality support, his thread is abandoned but everyone who says "i cant get Gscraper working" simply dont know what versions he should use and with what proxies. My screenshot is clear proof its possible to harvest with Gscraper with high LPM, hopefully this is enough to prove @proxygo is not 100 % right telling that Gscraper is broken.

Click to expand...

I do not know what version you may be using, but I tested every version from the current back to 1.2.7.1, which is where Hawke changed the login method. This is the result typical of the test for each version:



There were 500 proxies from the same pool used for each test, and the same keywords were used for each. Only one bvrsion worked at all and its maximum URL/min was less than 45 and dropping.

same here but i only had from version 1.29 upto 1.3.6 and url rates where low
funny thing v 1.3.6 tells me i have close to 1000 working proxies but 10 urls a min

satyr85 said:

2 cents from me (because everyone says Gscraper is not working). Every user of Gscraper can use any Gscraper version from 1.x.x.x to 1.3.x.x. Some Gscraper versions are still working more than good and here is proof (screenshot from today):

Hawke have low quality support, his thread is abandoned but everyone who says "i cant get Gscraper working" simply dont know what versions he should use and with what proxies. My screenshot is clear proof its possible to harvest with Gscraper with high LPM, hopefully this is enough to prove @proxygo is not 100 % right telling that Gscraper is broken.

Click to expand...

155k LPM with gscraper? Sorry bud but i'm calling total BS on that one. There is no old or new version currently scraping like that with any usable footprints and keyword combinations.

i ran full test this morning took me an hr 20 mins.
port scanned 1500 proxies, 1000 passed gscraper test
40 urls a min. if there where 150k url proxies a min out there
ide already have them, u dont do this job 12 years and not no
what works and whats new in the proxy game... me thinks
he posted pic of an old working version that use to get 150k
urls a min - hell i can do that and say i got 200k urls a min today

satyr 1st september
2 cents from me (because everyone says Gscraper is not working). Every user of Gscraper can
use any Gscraper version from 1.x.x.x to 1.3.x.x. Some Gscraper versions are still working more
than good and here is proof (screenshot from today):

Click to expand...

and satyr - hard to believe a user who says in this thread gscraper works fine
on older versions but u wont say which..........but in a thread yesterday you contradicted
yourself.

http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh.../784139-gscraper-working-now.html#post8225078

satyr85 said:

Yesterday, 07:58 PM Right now for harvesting SB is better choice.

Click to expand...

i ran full test this morning took me an hr 20 mins.
port scanned 1500 proxies, 1000 passed gscraper test
40 urls a min. if there where 150k url proxies a min out there
ide already have them, u dont do this job 12 years and not no
what works and whats new in the proxy game... me thinks
he posted pic of an old working version that use to get 150k
urls a min - hell i can do that and say i got 200k urls a min today

Click to expand...

1. You use Gscraper for testing proxies. Gscraper is bad proxy tester, everyone who is heavy in proxy game use other / custom coded proxy checkers. 1000 proxies can pass Gscraper test and 0 will work.
2. Port scan != port scan. Some people port scan with 4k proxy@port per second, some with speed 400k proxy@port per second. Difference is huge.
3. Some proxies no longer work in Gscraper. Proxies that work are hard to find and require very fast scanning. 1000 proxies from port scanning dont mean 1k proxies able to harvest.
4. Yes i dont do this job for 12 years, but its not about how long i do this, its about what i can do and what i know. You do this for long time, but this dont mean you know everything and your knowhow is up to date. Noone know everything.
5. Google harvesting game (in last time) change weekly - things that were working 1 week ago dont work now and its not about scraper, its about proxies. For example few days ago i was able to get 1XXk lpm, now im able to get mid XXk lpm with same proxies.
6. My screenshot have this thread as background (and its proof that this screenshot is not few months old). You dont see it?

but in a thread yesterday you contradicted yourself.

Click to expand...

Can you explain how i contradicted myself? I never said (in past few weeks) that Gscraper is better than SB. Its obvious that SB is better because Gscraper dont have support.

Sorry bud but i'm calling total BS on that one

Click to expand...

I have something that will prove that i dont post BS. Video recorded today:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=nk3UlgR_XLM

Is Gscraper working?
At last 1 version is able to harvest google right now but it can change.
Is harvesting google easy?
No, its harder and harder day by day.

Its all about proxies. Tons of proxies on 8088, 8123 and 8080 ports worked few months ago, but wont work now. We all have to adapt if we want to harvest google.

i own a license of gscaper with proxy service and its not working for me either.. back to sbox

and satyre this is why i have no respect for you. let me explain.

when i opened this thread against hawke it wasnt for me it was for everyone using
gscraper finding there tool hardly works, support is none existent, sales thread on bhw
abandoned , email's ignored, skype users blocked - i dont even use gscraper i do not scrape
or do any type of seo work, i just provide the proxies, this thread was me as a bhw user
looking out for fellow bhw users not to be ripped off by hawke. and it was my first shit thread
since i joined bhw in 2007. my first account was hacked b4 u ask.

now in the last 2 weeks ive seen you satyre post on several threads, 1 in the bhw lounge
here in the shit list, and over at the gsa forums that there is still an older working version
out there of gscraper that still works. you had posted pics , and video showing there is
an old version out there still working......whats my point...........

why i stuck my neck out to get hawks product removed from bhw i did it for everyone
thats what a community is, but when i pmd u on bhw asked you this question.

Originally Posted by proxygo
u keep telling people gscraper works then u cut out the picture wich version u have working
that no1 else can find, wont u share with bhw this magical version u have ..
after all if your not lying u have nothing to hide right

Click to expand...

but rather than help your fellow bhw members with what old version works
you post pics hiding the version of the 1 u have working, u post a video hiding
the 1 u have working - and u send me this reply.

satyr
I dont tell Gscraper works great, i only say some of Gscraper versions (at least one) are working
(lpm depends on proxy quality). What proxies are working and with what version - its part of proxy seller know how and you probably agree with that. Thats why i dont give this info away and i keep it for my clients

Click to expand...

thats what makes me a better man than you, i look out for my buyers and the
bhw community, you who seem to no of an old working version of gscraper say i keep
this info for my customers......thats what makes u selfish and me selfless many own that
tool on bhw and that fact u wont tell them theres an old version out there working
speaks volumes..... end of

Ok... the thread has run it's course - enough said.

Closing thread