ardley216
Elite Member
- Mar 28, 2008
- 2,389
- 2,418
I've extensively tested all these tools:
LTP: is OK... the difficulty rating is VERY hit and miss, most certainly not reliable.
UNF: great for getting lots of keywords quickly.. DO NOT use the difficulty tool, its a load of crap.
MS: Still probably the best way to manually decide if a keyword is easy. It also uses Majestic API data for keywords on mass. I still like the tool
TT: Nope, not good at all.
Keyword Revealer: used to be good before it went paid, but was very slow to get difficulty results. Plus the difficulty metric is weak (average of top 10 PA)
Other difficulty metrics people should avoid:
intitle, inurl and exact match results.. This has a very weak correlation on difficulty
Overall, I would say MS is still the best way to decide if a keyword is easy. can take a lot of time, but you get lots of good data from the top 10 results.
LTP: is OK... the difficulty rating is VERY hit and miss, most certainly not reliable.
UNF: great for getting lots of keywords quickly.. DO NOT use the difficulty tool, its a load of crap.
MS: Still probably the best way to manually decide if a keyword is easy. It also uses Majestic API data for keywords on mass. I still like the tool
TT: Nope, not good at all.
Keyword Revealer: used to be good before it went paid, but was very slow to get difficulty results. Plus the difficulty metric is weak (average of top 10 PA)
Other difficulty metrics people should avoid:
intitle, inurl and exact match results.. This has a very weak correlation on difficulty
Overall, I would say MS is still the best way to decide if a keyword is easy. can take a lot of time, but you get lots of good data from the top 10 results.