drivetime123
Junior Member
- Sep 22, 2008
- 182
- 36
Just wondering which is the best Auto Content Generator? Thanks
Best Auto Content Generator?
- Thread starter drivetime123
- Start date
Are you talking about fully automatic?
Or semi automatic?
I am also very interested hearing what people think.
I tried to use this one http://articlesubmitter.imwishlist.com/article-spinner-help/
It is rewriting tool with synonyms very easy to use, but it eats up MY ENTIRE RAM.
Or semi automatic?
I am also very interested hearing what people think.
I tried to use this one http://articlesubmitter.imwishlist.com/article-spinner-help/
It is rewriting tool with synonyms very easy to use, but it eats up MY ENTIRE RAM.
drivetime123
Junior Member
- Sep 22, 2008
- 182
- 36
Both actually. Ill check out that link, thanks
Laser
Senior Member
- Apr 29, 2008
- 874
- 354
fatjack'sblackhat
Power Member
- Jul 16, 2008
- 628
- 120
anyone have content solution? why is it good?
madhatter110
Junior Member
- Sep 16, 2008
- 169
- 14
can somebody please post how to use content solution, this program looks very complicated, would appreciate some insight into this.
heretolearn
Junior Member
- Jul 1, 2008
- 101
- 8
I have Content Solution. It spits out a lot of content but the content is gibberish (non-readable). It basically uses synonyms and you can set this to be done automatically or you could sit there and try to do it manually to get something more readable. There are instructional videos on the site on how to use the software. It does other things like create RSS feeds of the gibberish it creates etc.
fatjack'sblackhat
Power Member
- Jul 16, 2008
- 628
- 120
rss feed os the gibberish? wtf does that mean? sry please clarify
fatjack'sblackhat
Power Member
- Jul 16, 2008
- 628
- 120
how can i use rss to get more views? is that even possible? maybe im asking the wrong question idk
heretolearn
Junior Member
- Jul 1, 2008
- 101
- 8
Content Solution in auto mode synonymizes the content so what you get is non-readable gibberish and it uses that gibberish to create RSS feeds. The RSS feeds are refreshable, so each time you reload the page a new synonymized version of your original article is shown. Content Solution can also output the content as txt files. But as I said above, if you put in the extra time you can sit there and synonymize your original article manually to get more readable content.
Last edited:
fatjack'sblackhat
Power Member
- Jul 16, 2008
- 628
- 120
but what does the rss option on AC allow me to do?
heretolearn
Junior Member
- Jul 1, 2008
- 101
- 8
I was just listing a few things that Content Solution does. Such as:
1. synonymizes
2. scrapes
3. produces RSS feeds
4. produces txt files.
AC was not on my mind when I mentioned those things. I've never used AC.
1. synonymizes
2. scrapes
3. produces RSS feeds
4. produces txt files.
AC was not on my mind when I mentioned those things. I've never used AC.
fatjack'sblackhat
Power Member
- Jul 16, 2008
- 628
- 120
oh ok.. nevermind I was referring to the AC rss option.. anyone know anything about this?
dbrown
BANNED
- Dec 26, 2007
- 105
- 186
Gimme another day/or two and I will be rolling out a site that will auto generate content. No ads and it will be free. Heck I won't even ask for your email.
The content it generate is pretty damn good compared to the other tools I have seen. Of course my opinion is biased, I will let you guys judge.
The content it generate is pretty damn good compared to the other tools I have seen. Of course my opinion is biased, I will let you guys judge.
Laser
Senior Member
- Apr 29, 2008
- 874
- 354
Where is it scraping from?
And how different from the original is your end result?
I suspect after reading the results it's shuffling sentences only.
The end result is good for say spam blogs.
It does generate alot of content.
I searched "miami dolphin football" and it generated at least 10,000 words of content, in about 30 seconds.
Last edited:
dbrown
BANNED
- Dec 26, 2007
- 105
- 186
Multiple sources, Google results, Yahoo, MSN, wiki, and the list goes on
There is a huge difference in the end result.
You would suspect wrong. There is a lot more than that going on. However, we did have issues with synonyms and put that part back into alpha.
The end results is certainly useful for many bla-ck hat-ters and as I said recently, we are almost done with the api and will release some scripts to get user sites online and automated
Thanks
:tee: