1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Best arguments for building web 2.0 links manually - let me hear yours.

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by ningning, Mar 16, 2013.

  1. ningning

    ningning Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Messages:
    926
    Likes Received:
    261
    Despite all the fancy and much discussed automated tools many of us still build links manually.

    Why is it that manual link building is considered better quality?

    Please post you best arguments.

    Here are mine:

    1. Much higher success rate
    2. Much better stick rate
    3. Much more sites available (Automated tools lack support for many sites)
    4. Gives you an edge over competitor who use automated tools only
    5. It is faster to just build the links than to configure software or build custom templates
    6. There is no expenses to tools
    7. Better quality properties with custom theme, correctly filled profile etc.
    8. No footprints
    9. Option to build authority web 2.0 with several posts/pages
    10. No falls positive submission confirmations (or falls negative)
    11. 100% control

    To be fair we should list some downsides too


    1. Time consuming
    2. Hard to organize
     
  2. TerryMeshon

    TerryMeshon Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2013
    Messages:
    194
    Likes Received:
    36
    Occupation:
    Online entrepreneur
    Location:
    null
    Ive never understood my people would buy software unless their site has no lifespan.

    If your in it to win it, do it properly... no bot can do anything as well as a human, at least not THIS human lol....
     
  3. LukaB

    LukaB Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2010
    Messages:
    3,547
    Likes Received:
    4,248
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    Hard to organize? Not at all.

    I build web 2.0s with the following way (Manual/made by hand)

    1 unique article per web 2.0, each web 2.0 has 1 unique article (with a backlink to your money site, image and video) and 4-6 other "high quality SPUN articles" WITHOUT a backlink in them, but with an image or two. This is just to make the website look legit and quality.

    Proper paragraphs, image seo, and so on.


    Works great.....
     
  4. aka sam

    aka sam Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    3,810
    Likes Received:
    894
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Internet Marketer
    Location:
    Black Hat World
    Home Page:
    manual is the best way..My reason being :

    1. while you make a manual submission...you can put some great pics ..put all the user profile details ..and the web 2.0 will last longer because of it .

    2. If you make a web 2.0 with above said qualities ...people who come to visit them...will have more faith on you as compared to a automated web 2.0 site..


    Thats my 2 cents.
     
  5. hip_hop_x

    hip_hop_x Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2009
    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    61
    Occupation:
    Developer
    Home Page:
    Your mistake is that by doing it auto you think it will be crap or low quality. With more work you can automate that process and provide great quality as well, good content readable made, great spun article, videos + images.So there's not really any motive why not to go on automation if you can do that. Again quality is everything, not the method.
     
  6. DamageX

    DamageX Elite Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,692
    Likes Received:
    1,687
    Occupation:
    Unemployable
    Location:
    Former nomad
    Mine:

    Why do things the easy way, when you can do them manually?

    You get the point. ;)
     
  7. DamageX

    DamageX Elite Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,692
    Likes Received:
    1,687
    Occupation:
    Unemployable
    Location:
    Former nomad
    Mine:

    Why do things the easy way, when you can do them manually?

    You get the point. ;)
     
  8. cloakndagger2

    cloakndagger2 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2012
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    88
    Pros and cons for both,you can create quality web 2.0's on auto pilot if you know what you're doing.Placing one article up will do nothing.You realise you can update automated web 2.0 don't you.I do both,If you learn to spin properly,use commonsense there is virtually nothing between a manual web 2.0 and an high quality automated one.
    There is a guy here who is pretty hot on the spinning,look for a video by matthew woodward,learn,implement,enjoy.If you have say 20 web 2.0's by manually spinning at sentence and paragraph level and spinning videos etc you can create easily 50 unique articles,quality articles.No one will know the difference between your manual web 2 and your automated one.
    As I say I do both but to imply manual is the only way to produce quality web 2's is wrong.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2013
  9. gz_cp

    gz_cp Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    334
    Likes Received:
    35
    duplicated
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2013
  10. maecenas23

    maecenas23 Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,070
    Likes Received:
    986
    Occupation:
    Full-time worker :D
    Location:
    #RIPCity
    The most common cons are all related to time consuming :)
    All the pros are related to better control.

    From these 2 points we can develop an entire theory.
     
  11. tranza

    tranza Power Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2012
    Messages:
    599
    Likes Received:
    115
    You can automated the process, everything you can doing a browser can be automated, just dont use common seo tools (senuke all that craps).