Best 2.0 Networks for Backlinknetwork?

waltersweb

Registered Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
93
Reaction score
15
Hi guys,
I would love to go balls deep into using web 2.0s as "pbn"s. which domains do you use for linking to your money site?

i have set up two tests on weebly and managed to get them to 18/73 and 29/73 (UR/DR as of AHREFS) within two weeks. But i have read, that a lot of web 2.0s don't get indexed or have no follow links only. so i would love to head about what you guys are using. i had some pen.io profiles aswell, but they got deleted for example... just want to make sure i don't waste time and money pumping a site and then it gets deleted :-/

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
How did u make them 18/73 and what are these values?
Ah sorry, forget to add that. It is UR/DR as of AHREFS.

I on one (the higher one) I used a combination of PBN, 301 shorteners and GSA blast bought on fiverr and on the other I tried my own tweak with building own 301 shorteners and running my own GSA campaign. I am not quite satisfied with the results, but it is a starting point and they are still increasing every day with a lot of backlinks still not found by AHREFS.

however, I targeted some keywords with both sites and non of the keywords is yet ranking. But that might be due to bad keyword density or bad anchor text ratio. Still looking into that.
 
oh okay. well you can find do-follow list of web20s on the net. but google knows what webs are, and that they are extremely abused and u need a lot of links diversify (apart from webs only). what else, you mentioned you did couple blogs pointing to your money site. you need to make more blogs (and other backlinks as well). i dont think you can do that manually because in most cases you need at least hundreds of links (from various domains) pointing at your money site to rank on no comp keywords/low comp kws

what i mean is that you've done very well now you need to automate it.

about indexing, hq platforms (such as tumblr) get indexed easily comparing to gsa blast. however you should get a good indexer (most are scam and not even indexing 0.02% of your links)
 
oh okay. well you can find do-follow list of web20s on the net. but google knows what webs are extremely abused and u need a lot of links diversify (apart from webs only). what else, you mentioned you did couple blogs pointing to your money site. you need to make more blogs (and other backlinks as well). i dont think you can do that manually because in most cases you need at least hundreds of links (from various domains) pointing at your money site to rank on no comp keywords/low comp kws

what i mean is that you've done very well now you need to automate it.
Thanks man :) yeah that is exactly what I am looking into. Automate as much as possible. Have multiple tiers of different links etc.
I just love to try different angles to things and test test test. Especially with automation this is really nice! I have some ideas and I will surely try them the next few weeks.

Regarding the rankings for keywords: I didnt point on from those weeblys, I wanted to rank them as parasites on their own. I now see that they dont get rankings so easily and quickly but that might be due to a huge amount of factors. But what I see is that they get some good stats in the eyes of ahrefs. Sadly those stats are not yet as good on majestics for example, but we will see what the next weeks will bring
 
Thanks man :) yeah that is exactly what I am looking into. Automate as much as possible. Have multiple tiers of different links etc.
I just love to try different angles to things and test test test. Especially with automation this is really nice! I have some ideas and I will surely try them the next few weeks.

Regarding the rankings for keywords: I didnt point on from those weeblys, I wanted to rank them as parasites on their own. I now see that they dont get rankings so easily and quickly but that might be due to a huge amount of factors. But what I see is that they get some good stats in the eyes of ahrefs. Sadly those stats are not yet as good on majestics for example, but we will see what the next weeks will bring

majestic stats are not that important. TF means links from authorities like wikipedia. you can't get these if your site is blackhat so why care (if its whitehat, then its possible, but not that easy). CF is just an indirect amount of backlinks.

most of top competitors in my niche have like TF 0-1 and cf 23-40
 
majestic stats are not that important. TF means links from authorities like wikipedia. you can't get these if your site is blackhat so why care (if its whitehat, then its possible, but not that easy). CF is just an indirect amount of backlinks.

most of top competitors in my niche have like TF 0-1 and cf 23-40
That is good to hear. Do you know about some less known web 2.0s which might not be so spammy in Google's eyes?
 
I personally wouldn't bother with tier 2 for web 2.0s especially if it's a SER blast.

High metrics don't mean Google looks at them the same way as Ahrefs and whatnot.

Play it for quality and not quantity.

Make sure your properties are setup in a way that Google will indexed them without a problem and they will pass a manual review from web 2.0s moderators.

Use them for URL variations and Brand names variations anchor text link only. Never for exact match and highly related anchor texts.

Here's a nice list of web 2.0s:
http://www.bloggersideas.com/top-list-of-high-pr-web-2-0-sites/
 
Some best 2.0 networks for backlinknetwork:
1X PR7, 1X PR6, 8X PR4, 5X PR3 PERMANENT HOMEPAGE BACKLINK NETWORK.
2) 75 x WEB 2.0 ARTICLE SUBMISSION BACKLINKS. These articles will have 1000 profile backlinks blasted at them to create more link juice to your main site:
3) 50 AUTHORITY EDU BACKLINKS:
FREE SERVICE: 2500 "WHO IS", "ABOUT US", "WEBSITE STATISTICS" WEBSITE BACKLINKS:
 
Back
Top