1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

BacklinkBooster vs BacklinksIndexer

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by garrido, Jun 25, 2012.

  1. garrido

    garrido Supreme Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,301
    Likes Received:
    341
    Occupation:
    Hacker / Developer
    Location:
    Hackerland
    What´s the best service from your point of view?
     
  2. shannonfoster74

    shannonfoster74 Newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2012
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    1
    I've tried both and a few others as well. Gonna have to say backlinksindexer.com comes out on top here. I heard they also use lindexed as an added feature so that's a bonus I'd consider as well.
     
  3. garrido

    garrido Supreme Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,301
    Likes Received:
    341
    Occupation:
    Hacker / Developer
    Location:
    Hackerland
    Why? backlinkindexer is 10x more expensive and don´t have a live link chequer.
     
  4. garrido

    garrido Supreme Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,301
    Likes Received:
    341
    Occupation:
    Hacker / Developer
    Location:
    Hackerland
    Any other help?
     
  5. innosoft

    innosoft Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,633
    Likes Received:
    639
    Occupation:
    Software Developer, SEO
    Location:
    Office
    Home Page:
    so wats the conclusion?? backlinkbooster or backlinksindexer???? does BIE works like macklink energizer?? like posting in web 2.0 properties???
     
  6. Nubby

    Nubby Newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2010
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    1
    I just use Scrapebox, but it would be nice to have it built in - not a deal breaker. Also, if you analyze what each service does you realize booster #'s are bogus. 100k links indexed for $39? You can't even buy forum profiles for that amount, let alone get that accomplished that cheap. I've been a member of BacklinksIndexer for months and see a steady rise in the web 2.0s, articles and high quality angela and paul profiles I enter to my money sites. Backlinksindexer has a network of thousands of websites, whereas booster has 30 incontent ones, according to their own pages. If I had to use a different one than backlinksindexer it would be LinkLicious since I've used it in the past for mass submissions but pinging / crawling isn't the same as backling with web2.0s, twitter, bookmarks, etc. Depends on your goals and budget.
     
  7. markhenry121

    markhenry121 Elite Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2011
    Messages:
    2,149
    Likes Received:
    239
    I am go with BacklinkBooster because it's automatically rise to the top of serp results, they get indexed faster so why I am use BacklinksIndexer, I will suggest you, BacklinkBooster is best.
     
  8. supaH

    supaH Junior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2011
    Messages:
    123
    Likes Received:
    20
  9. williamk

    williamk BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    1,030
    Likes Received:
    184
    Now I am interested in this too. I hope to get some good results from it. Didn't even hear about this before.