Back Link Diagram Tutorial
- Thread starter jvmarket
- Start date
olm75
Senior Member
- Jan 14, 2009
- 929
- 114
BTW JV i sent u an email about my marketing strategy have u got around to reviewing it to make sure i was on the right track...because from further reasearch u really dont have to submit to all these web 2.0 sites to get ranked high in google i am figuring that u mainly do it to get more traffic, but i am trying to see how fast and what it will take to get to the top of google and the other SEs and stay... so i am thinking u need to find which web 2.0 site ranks the best and shows a backlink quicker then just pond it with backlinks... and then use other tools to find high relevant pr sites blogs forums etc... am i correct JV or anyone...
What an informative post! Just took me 2 hours to read though the whole posts. Thank you for all you guys.
How about submitting in directories? Does this method still work? If you were to submit to directories, are you going to submit the web2.0 pages or the main page(s)? IMHO submitting web2.0 to directories could create the env. more noisy.
How about submitting in directories? Does this method still work? If you were to submit to directories, are you going to submit the web2.0 pages or the main page(s)? IMHO submitting web2.0 to directories could create the env. more noisy.
hwolfpack6
BANNED
- Dec 11, 2008
- 646
- 178
A couple itching questions, I'm going to start trying bum marketing in a couple days.
On your Web 2.0 sites, do you need entirely new content? Spun content? No content?
On your Web 2.0 sites, do you need entirely new content? Spun content? No content?
jvmarket
Regular Member
- Dec 27, 2008
- 429
- 767
Hi Olm75....seems your email made it to my junk mail bin. I'm really sure what you are asking. I like the info you can get from market samurai and google sniper is an excellent technique in my opinion.
I like taking a number of tactics and blend them together to form a brand new method.
sometimes tweaking something just a little bit can make a huge difference. The best advice I can give is to test and track....in time you will learn exactly what works.
j
I like taking a number of tactics and blend them together to form a brand new method.
sometimes tweaking something just a little bit can make a huge difference. The best advice I can give is to test and track....in time you will learn exactly what works.
j
Hey JV in ur expereance and strategy after you have added the content to all the web2.0 sites, do they rank relatively highly or do you have a system where you ping them all and then bookmark all the web2.0 sites. If so then in ur expereance how many times do u bookmark each web2.0 property? i know this is a relative question but lets say its for a long tail keypharse which isnt to competitive. And would you recommend anything else besides bookmarking these web2.0 sites to get them ranking highly.
Do you have some sort of system for this phase (getting as many of the web2.0 sites ranked as high) AKA Multiple listings on page one.
One thing i will admit is that i am not using spun content but im not sure how much of a factor this can be. I guess i should test out spinable content. Another part to the puzzle lol.
Do you have some sort of system for this phase (getting as many of the web2.0 sites ranked as high) AKA Multiple listings on page one.
One thing i will admit is that i am not using spun content but im not sure how much of a factor this can be. I guess i should test out spinable content. Another part to the puzzle lol.
jvmarket
Regular Member
- Dec 27, 2008
- 429
- 767
we ping everything once
we bookmark every submission a random number of times anywhere from 1 - 20
There are keywords that we own every listing on the first page and 17 out of the top 20 search results.
The process to get there can be different for each keyword...some may only need 1 content package while others may take 3 or 4
j
we bookmark every submission a random number of times anywhere from 1 - 20
There are keywords that we own every listing on the first page and 17 out of the top 20 search results.
The process to get there can be different for each keyword...some may only need 1 content package while others may take 3 or 4
j
hwolfpack6
BANNED
- Dec 11, 2008
- 646
- 178
High quality is very vague. Do you mean it's high quality in the sense that you rewrite each sentence 2 times and it always comes out different or that you use a high quality translator?
jvmarket
Regular Member
- Dec 27, 2008
- 429
- 767
For our purposes we define high quality at least 40% unique, readable by humans and have the keywords we are targeting where we want them.
The 2 sentence rewrite is the first part of the rewriting process...we also thesaurisize ( we made that word up) the articles.
The end result is high quality articles that look unique to readers (and Google) that can be posted accross multiple web 2.0 properties
j
Micallef
Supreme Member
- Apr 29, 2009
- 1,345
- 1,231
Hi JV, just want to say that this thread is truly exemplary. Thank-you.
Regarding your original diagram I have one question - how does the fact that most of these web 2.0 sites are NoFollow affect the system as a whole?
I can see that having lots of web 2.0 properties might allow you to dominate the top 10 or top 20.
However, the link system looks designed to generate traffic (human clicks), not page rank (which cannot be passed over a NoFollow tag).
Is my reasoning correct?
Regarding your original diagram I have one question - how does the fact that most of these web 2.0 sites are NoFollow affect the system as a whole?
I can see that having lots of web 2.0 properties might allow you to dominate the top 10 or top 20.
However, the link system looks designed to generate traffic (human clicks), not page rank (which cannot be passed over a NoFollow tag).
Is my reasoning correct?
jvmarket
Regular Member
- Dec 27, 2008
- 429
- 767
Some of the sites will bring good traffic while others are use primarily for back links. There are many thoughts about nofollow tags and the effect they have or dont have.
I dont subscribe to much of the crap that is spread across the IM world --- take for instance the dupe content debate. I can tell you that we have dupe content that is not only indexed but ranks very well.
So does Google have to play by the nofollow rules?
Does Google play by any rules....including their own?
I dont play by the rules so whay should I expect them to?
The best advice that I can give is to test, test, test and then test some more. What works great for me may not work as good for you because we dont do things exactly the same way.
Just because are quoted as fact doesn't always mean its fact....something to think about
j
PS I'm not debating anything in this post just expressing my thoughts
I dont subscribe to much of the crap that is spread across the IM world --- take for instance the dupe content debate. I can tell you that we have dupe content that is not only indexed but ranks very well.
So does Google have to play by the nofollow rules?
Does Google play by any rules....including their own?
I dont play by the rules so whay should I expect them to?
The best advice that I can give is to test, test, test and then test some more. What works great for me may not work as good for you because we dont do things exactly the same way.
Just because are quoted as fact doesn't always mean its fact....something to think about
j
PS I'm not debating anything in this post just expressing my thoughts
croixstar
Junior Member
- May 17, 2009
- 139
- 65
JV, in reference to this post above. Can you please take a look at this thread and tell me if this service will pretty much do exactly what you mention above - shedloads of bookmarks from the same 10 sites...
Blackhatworld - blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo/90139-getting-easy-backlinks.html
HI JV
i have recently started using traffic android to bookmark all my web2.0 properties. one thing i find frustrating is that you have to add 1 url at a time, and with so many web2.0 properties to add how do you add so many urls. do you have someone u get to do this specifically for you. i dont mind outsourcing this part if that what it will take to get a good bookmarking strategy going.
how do you do the bookmarking aspect. do you get someone to create mass accounts from se nuke and then add them all in traffic android and then someone to add all the links in traffic android.
im really trying to formulate an easy solution to this whole process of bookmarking every single property and since you already do it was wondering what ur take on this is.
also i noticed traffic android isnt really digging or doing any propeller submission. is this the case for you also
by the way this thread has helped me get in the right direction
i have recently started using traffic android to bookmark all my web2.0 properties. one thing i find frustrating is that you have to add 1 url at a time, and with so many web2.0 properties to add how do you add so many urls. do you have someone u get to do this specifically for you. i dont mind outsourcing this part if that what it will take to get a good bookmarking strategy going.
how do you do the bookmarking aspect. do you get someone to create mass accounts from se nuke and then add them all in traffic android and then someone to add all the links in traffic android.
im really trying to formulate an easy solution to this whole process of bookmarking every single property and since you already do it was wondering what ur take on this is.
also i noticed traffic android isnt really digging or doing any propeller submission. is this the case for you also
by the way this thread has helped me get in the right direction
jvmarket
Regular Member
- Dec 27, 2008
- 429
- 767
We have people creating new accts every day. We also have our employees use traffic android, senuke and BMD.
we also do some manual stuff as well. All of it is outsourced which is probably the hardest part...finding quality workers.
j
we also do some manual stuff as well. All of it is outsourced which is probably the hardest part...finding quality workers.
j
tony-raymondo
Junior Member
- Jun 19, 2009
- 178
- 466
>> Instead of linking the web 2.0 properties to one another, wouldn't it be more effective to build a large number of links directly to the web 2.0 sites from other sources?
i would like to know this as wel?
i would like to know this as wel?