AssociatedContent Method that Works for Me!

Status
Not open for further replies.
well, if u live outside the u.s, you can give a crap to the u.s law...
like me, I live in brazil..in Brazil, BE HACKER isn't a crime...imagine fake W9 -.-

the question isn't if you are able to get away with a w9, the bottom line is, will they verify the through the IRS if the w9 is fake or not prior to pay you?

it is obvious that even if you live in the U.S. by using L1 proxies, constantly clearing out your cookies, and by being careful, nobody will trace you down, not even the feds, but, one thing is to be safe about what you are doing, another is if it will work or not, perhaps after you've submitted the fake w9, they pay you once or twice while they verify it, and then ban you, and all your time and work and money (if you outsource) will go down the drain, and you only received like $20 or so.
 
The phone verification wont really be so much of an issue, rather it will put some extra money in some people's pocket ( wink wink PVA's)

it would be fun if it was only the phone verification. but you also need the w9 form, that's what will turn AC into a dead method for us.
 
it would be fun if it was only the phone verification. but you also need the w9 form, that's what will turn AC into a dead method for us.

Oh really... well i went back and read through again and it states there that alternately you will be asked to provide W9. So my understanding is that it is one or the other (i might be wrong)

Just copied the test below from the link above

"When the User Verification program goes live, you will be prompted on the site to enter your phone number and choose to receive either a text message or phone call. Within 5 minutes, you will receive your call or text message containing a code, which you will be asked enter into the website to verify your account. Alternately, you will be able to verify your account by faxing a complete IRS W-9 form to AC?s accounting department"
 
problems solved.. as it clearly says on kyrash's post you can chose phone or w9
 
Oh really... well i went back and read through again and it states there that alternately you will be asked to provide W9. So my understanding is that it is one or the other (i might be wrong)

Just copied the test below from the link above

"When the User Verification program goes live, you will be prompted on the site to enter your phone number and choose to receive either a text message or phone call. Within 5 minutes, you will receive your call or text message containing a code, which you will be asked enter into the website to verify your account. Alternately, you will be able to verify your account by faxing a complete IRS W-9 form to AC?s accounting department"

I honestly hope you're right and the text means exactly what it says.

well, in a months time we'll see, until then, will continue exploiting AC to the max of my ability.
 
I don't think this is going to work, but it took 5 minute give or take a minute so I'll hope.
 
You don't get published/payed until about 10 days after submit, niceguybad.
 
Well, if they block us I hope the site chokes on its own stupidity and fails miserably.

Alternatively anyone want to JV and create another AC? :D
 
anyone know of a tool like copyscape but that checks offline docs?
I have tons of articles and I want to try this but I don't wan to upload all the articles and then check them that way if possible?

try dupecop desktop pro with a word window length of 3 versus the original article..copyscape finds matches by checking window length of 3 to 5 words
 
try dupecop desktop pro with a word window length of 3 versus the original article..copyscape finds matches by checking window length of 3 to 5 words

Thanks (button clicked). I think I might just sign up for the premium copyscape. 100 articles for $5 isn't bad at all. i didn't even realize that was an option as I have only used copyscape like 2 times in the past for articles that were online. :)
 
I definitely dont buy this. I spent most of my day a couple weeks ago rewriting ezines by hand, the ENTIRE darn article. I rewrote 40 and 6 of them were accepted. And you are only changing the first two sentences?

I wish you guys luck, but I dont think its going to work.
 
i don't have to show proof because i have no reasons to come here and lie!
but i see so many not believing it that i may take 10 minutes of my time to show some proof if you all want!
 
JokerLA,
Changing only the first 2 sentences in an enzine article that you got from a list off warez, really sounds amazing. But I can't help but put a few things together that gives me the impression that it's not true.

Now, I could be wrong but when I consider your username,"JokerLA," along with this idea, then I just can't believe it. Its like your name says that you are playing a joke on the ones who try this.

JokerLA, could this name mean the Joker of LA out to get a laugh off the ones who try this?

As I said, I can be very well be wrong about it, but i turn down this idea. At least until we see what happens with the ones who try it.
 
I hate to burst your bubble but I had an article declined because 2 sentences in the third paragraph were found online in another article. Maybe it depends on the editor reviewing your work but I seriously don't think changing only 2 sentences is going to be enough to keep fooling them.
 
I got only one thing to say to the OP. post your AC account link with only 2 sentences edited, and I will give you an e-blowjob. lol
 
ok i just took these screenshots i hope make myself clear that I'M DOING IT, NOT MAKING IT UP!
And my nick has nothing to do with it.

Original Article:
Code:
http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/6152/93441184xj7.jpg

MY 2 SENTENCES MODIFIED!
Code:
http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/4149/47595809rj6.jpg

and the PROOF that it got accepted!
Code:
http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/6025/19328972eh2.jpg



I got only one thing to say to the OP. post your AC account link with only 2 sentences edited, and I will give you an e-blowjob. lol

e-blowjob ? how that works lol i deserve it i guess!


*so silent now*
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top