articoolo or others: Rank in long tail?

soyglobal

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
359
Reaction score
41
Hello, someone is using articoolo or other robo-writers and ranked its content?
theoretically, this kind of content is better than manual or old spinners content, but I didn't see any saying if it work or are waste of money

Thanks
 
I think it depends on a topic. High level news agancies are using AI for a while, but there is no algo for any topic. And it's available for top level, but not for everybody. You might use it for low level PBN, but not for the major site.
 
1: the quality of those AI sucks
2: you can't afford the price
3: useless (useful when u are the owner of such a service, u know)
 
People do rank keywords by spamming the shit out of search results. You just need to find a way to do it.
 
What system suggest?
Argo, gsa content generator or seo content machine are the same "poor quality"?

Price is not a problem

1: the quality of those AI sucks
2: you can't afford the price
3: useless (useful when u are the owner of such a service, u know)
 
If articles looks "natural" the articoolo prices aren't a problem for my, the problem is that should look natural and rank

Price is a very big problem, check the price of articoolo, and calculate how much posts u can afford to spam, this is a negative ROI game.
 
If articles looks "natural" the articoolo prices aren't a problem for my, the problem is that should look natural and rank

Bro, I hope u know what you are talking about, have u checked the price of there? That means, the price of that thing, nearly equal hire a cheap writer, now think about which one is better at a similar price, a real writer VS AI shit.
 
Early tests I did on Articoolo were not encouraging. It pulled in a lot of quotes from other documents rather than generating unique sentences. I am working on a text generator based on deep neural networks (deep learning) that will attempt to duplicate the results of OpenAI's DPT-2 system. PM me if you want to try it when ready. If the computational power required is not too expensive, I plan on making it free.
 
Early tests I did on Articoolo were not encouraging. It pulled in a lot of quotes from other documents rather than generating unique sentences. I am working on a text generator based on deep neural networks (deep learning) that will attempt to duplicate the results of OpenAI's DPT-2 system. PM me if you want to try it when ready. If the computational power required is not too expensive, I plan on making it free.

I would like to try. Please PM me.
 
Early tests I did on Articoolo were not encouraging. It pulled in a lot of quotes from other documents rather than generating unique sentences. I am working on a text generator based on deep neural networks (deep learning) that will attempt to duplicate the results of OpenAI's DPT-2 system. PM me if you want to try it when ready. If the computational power required is not too expensive, I plan on making it free.
i also interesting
 
Early tests I did on Articoolo were not encouraging. It pulled in a lot of quotes from other documents rather than generating unique sentences. I am working on a text generator based on deep neural networks (deep learning) that will attempt to duplicate the results of OpenAI's DPT-2 system. PM me if you want to try it when ready. If the computational power required is not too expensive, I plan on making it free.

Any update on this project?.
 
Early tests I did on Articoolo were not encouraging. It pulled in a lot of quotes from other documents rather than generating unique sentences. I am working on a text generator based on deep neural networks (deep learning) that will attempt to duplicate the results of OpenAI's DPT-2 system. PM me if you want to try it when ready. If the computational power required is not too expensive, I plan on making it free.

I am interested when you are ready. I have had people around me using AI but not for text generation.
 
I've tried just about every artiicle spinner and never seen one that writes "well".

On that note...

The day that AI can generate articles which are indistinguishable from human-written articles is absolutely coming -- but it's not here yet.

The thing is -- it's nothing that any of us should be hoping for. It's not like "just you" will have that technology. Nor will there be any limit to the number of articles it can produce. Throw in the power of cloud computing and you (and everyone else) will be able to generate 100,000 articles on any given topic. At which point, articles will essentially be valueless, and the whole concept of "search" (and "news".. and "publishing") is going to change forever.

If you want to use AI for content development, use Clearscope or Wordmetrics for better search performance and write it yourself. Spinners all suck. (For now).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top