Article Marketing Automation vs. Automatic Article Submitter vs. My Article Network

LetterCraft Inc.

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
124
Reaction score
30
Hey guys, I just wanted to know which one of these (Article Marketing Automation vs. Automatic Article Submitter vs. My Article Network) is the best article submitter? Or do you have any other submitter in mind? The sales page for all of these look pretty fancy :P Just can't decide which one of these would be best to use.
 
I am interested as well. Anybody have any reviews on these? Thanks
 
Article Marketing Automation (AMA) and My Article Network(MAN) are the same thing (MAN is a while labeled version of AMA).

I used AMA when it came out and I have a membership with MAN. I have been using it with a number of sites, multiple articles per site and truth be told, I don't know if the service really makes a big difference. Sure, you get some links, but it seems that a large number of the blogs in the system are low value blogs.

I also question the real number of blogs in the system. I think right now they claim to have over 15,000 blogs in the system, but I am not sure if that sounds right. I know last fall I removed my 800 blogs from the system (due to hosting changes and issues), and I wonder if other people did as well, since the distribution of articles fell during November/December.

It also made me laugh when they sent out a video in December showing the rankings that people were getting using their system. I think that they quoted 12 % of the sites were #1 in Google and 57% had top ten listings which they claimed they received using their system. But if you think about it, chances are that those sites are all marketed with other methods as well, not just AMA or MAN. I think most people would miss that fact (especially if you are a newbie), but realistically, we all know that to market a website properly, you would use various methods to do it.

All in all, even though I do use MAN, I don't count on it as my only marketing method. I see it as a way to get other links from other sites that I don't have to market on my own, so I consider it more of a bonus than a method I depend on. And when you consider that just six months of membership you could buy a license for LFE, you might be better off saving up your money and buying that tool instead - for me, it has worked a lot better.
 
For me all are the piece of crap because automation, good and worth thing is to submit article manually and this will worth you for future

;)
 
Article Marketing Automation (AMA) and My Article Network(MAN) are the same thing (MAN is a while labeled version of AMA).

I used AMA when it came out and I have a membership with MAN. I have been using it with a number of sites, multiple articles per site and truth be told, I don't know if the service really makes a big difference. Sure, you get some links, but it seems that a large number of the blogs in the system are low value blogs.

I also question the real number of blogs in the system. I think right now they claim to have over 15,000 blogs in the system, but I am not sure if that sounds right. I know last fall I removed my 800 blogs from the system (due to hosting changes and issues), and I wonder if other people did as well, since the distribution of articles fell during November/December.

It also made me laugh when they sent out a video in December showing the rankings that people were getting using their system. I think that they quoted 12 % of the sites were #1 in Google and 57% had top ten listings which they claimed they received using their system. But if you think about it, chances are that those sites are all marketed with other methods as well, not just AMA or MAN. I think most people would miss that fact (especially if you are a newbie), but realistically, we all know that to market a website properly, you would use various methods to do it.

All in all, even though I do use MAN, I don't count on it as my only marketing method. I see it as a way to get other links from other sites that I don't have to market on my own, so I consider it more of a bonus than a method I depend on. And when you consider that just six months of membership you could buy a license for LFE, you might be better off saving up your money and buying that tool instead - for me, it has worked a lot better.


Thanks for your review/feedback. I've read around that submitting articles for competition less than 20k is enough to get a top ten position, I was just wondering whether I should use one of these submission tools, some auto submitter that I heard of that submits to more than 1.8k article directories, or submit them manually. I've heard a few people saying submitting it manually will help you in the long term, but i don't really understand how because their system can't detect the fact that we're submitting it automatically or something, so i just wanted some clarity on these things. Help on this would be really great! Thanks again domquar! :D
 
I think some people recommend manually submitting to a small number of high traffic article sites because they don't work with many of the auto article submitters.

I know ezinearticles doesnt work with traffic anarchy.
 
The blog networking services are okay if you know how to implement them correctly, even though the PR is low on these blogs they give you a lot of i.p. diversity which is always a good thing.

All in all I think they are good if you have the extra money to blow as you'll receive tons of different sites linking back to yours, but I wouldn't completely rely on this strategy alone to get you high ranks.

Just like some people have said, the automated submitters most of the time are crap and you run into the same problem as the blog networks as most of the directories are low PR. Not to mention I've heard that some submitters even strip the **************** link, could be a rumor and I don't want to spend the time to test it out :P
 
Back
Top