- Oct 28, 2020
- 10,521
- 12,588
lulz Article Forge just manually ended my free trial 24 hours before the actual expiration date because I gave them negative feedback 
I created 2 articles (one was for "the effects of low self esteem", the other one I don't remember but probably it was "can you become infertile after abortion"... or something like that anyway).
Both these articles had phrases that sounded like "you'll get cancer and die", or something along those lines. I honestly don't know if those are the exact words, but that was the idea of some of those sentences, so I - frustratedly - gave them feedback telling that it's not normal for an article about the effects of low self esteem to say "you're getting cancer and die", and that all of the articles are not keyword relevant to begin with (which they aren't).
I also told them that after the trial expires I will cancel my membership because this type of content can't be used even for web 2.0s because even web 2.0s want quality content nowadays, which may or may not be true.
In fairness, the content that Article Forge produces is not all bad, and with manual editing you can still post it to web 2.0s safely, sometimes probably even on your money sites. But this only applies to native English speakers, non-native English speakers like myself can't always get the real meaning of words and phrases to be able to edit this content accurately, for which reason I expect the software to at least write on the topic that I specify, not beat around the bush leaving me to fry my brains trying to understand the main idea of the article and then fully edit it to be relevant to the keyword.
So, long story short: the articles are decent quality, but not relevant to the keywords (I am talking about long tail keywords here, for broad keywords they are relevant), so I gave them this feedback and they got so pissed off that they prematurely and manually ended my trial LMAO. Fucking wussies!
So yeah, there's Article Forge for you. If you want to use them and don't care about keyword relevance and are not bothered manually go through the articles to edit them to make sense and be relevant go ahead and use their service. Just make sure you never send them honest feedback lol
I created 2 articles (one was for "the effects of low self esteem", the other one I don't remember but probably it was "can you become infertile after abortion"... or something like that anyway).
Both these articles had phrases that sounded like "you'll get cancer and die", or something along those lines. I honestly don't know if those are the exact words, but that was the idea of some of those sentences, so I - frustratedly - gave them feedback telling that it's not normal for an article about the effects of low self esteem to say "you're getting cancer and die", and that all of the articles are not keyword relevant to begin with (which they aren't).
I also told them that after the trial expires I will cancel my membership because this type of content can't be used even for web 2.0s because even web 2.0s want quality content nowadays, which may or may not be true.
In fairness, the content that Article Forge produces is not all bad, and with manual editing you can still post it to web 2.0s safely, sometimes probably even on your money sites. But this only applies to native English speakers, non-native English speakers like myself can't always get the real meaning of words and phrases to be able to edit this content accurately, for which reason I expect the software to at least write on the topic that I specify, not beat around the bush leaving me to fry my brains trying to understand the main idea of the article and then fully edit it to be relevant to the keyword.
So, long story short: the articles are decent quality, but not relevant to the keywords (I am talking about long tail keywords here, for broad keywords they are relevant), so I gave them this feedback and they got so pissed off that they prematurely and manually ended my trial LMAO. Fucking wussies!
So yeah, there's Article Forge for you. If you want to use them and don't care about keyword relevance and are not bothered manually go through the articles to edit them to make sense and be relevant go ahead and use their service. Just make sure you never send them honest feedback lol
