I'm looking to change proxy providers. Question for the proxy pros.
Some proxy providers charge per IP address like $2 per IP address while others charge per GB like $8 per GB.
Are unlimited bandwidth proxies normally lower quality or what is the advantage of paying per GB when unlimited providers exist?
They are different business models. Not necessarily better or worse in quality.
Tl;Dr: paying per GB usually offers you more IPs and is good for things like social media automation. Paying per IP is good when you need lots of bandwidth and your task is not very sensitive to IP quality.
The "pay per GB" model is usually the case with floating IPs. Here you don't get a fixed IP, instead your requests frequently get routed through a *connection pool* with your IPs constantly changing. The only thing fixed is the region you are connecting from.
Such an arrangement is common with 4G/mobile proxy services.
The per-IP model makes sense for those providers whose infrastructure costs are low enough to offer you cheap data. This is usually the case with datacenter/colocation IPs where the provider gets dirt cheap bandwidth bundled with their server rental/rackspace.
Also, there's no such thing as "unlimited". Almost all of these providers have a large enough "soft limit" after which they will throttle your speeds.
Benefits of paying per GB:
- Transparency: There's no hidden limits.
-
Advanced Features: Often you are going to get things like on-demand IP rotation, big IP pools, fine-grained access control etc.
-
Better Infrastructure: the provider is charging you per GB consumed. If they are worth their salt, they are gonna put that money in getting more devices, have better uptime etc
Situations when paying per-IP makes sense:
- Your task doesn't demand a lot of IPs. Like if you are a scraping a single low traffic website or you need multiple IPs for testing some software
- You need heck ton of bandwidth: paying per GB definitely won't make sense in this case.