length of words on its own is of no importance. however, I will ensure that the response is of the appropriate length but within the context of the ques.I've noticed some shorter articles ranking pretty well too. Do you still aim for detailed posts or focus more on answering the query quickly?
It depends on the search intent. Short posts perform best for quick answers, while detailed technical topics still benefit from reaching around 1000 words to establish authority. The key is matching content length to what the reader genuinely needs.I've noticed some shorter articles ranking pretty well too. Do you still aim for detailed posts or focus more on answering the query quickly?
word count is no longer considered to be my seo goal. there are cases where the best approach is a quick response to the query nd there are also those that call for more guidance. in my case, the opttimum balance would be when i would satisfy the intent of the article without having to make the article long just for the sake of word count.I've noticed some shorter articles ranking pretty well too. Do you still aim for detailed posts or focus more on answering the query quickly?
Indeed. The introduction should address the question directly at the beginning and go into the details after that. If there is no need for such a big word count, I would prefer to make it shorter.In my opinion you should keep your article first 100 to 150 words in long and depth article direct to the query answer so the reader doesn't loose their focus.If you aren't writing a long and depth article then you should keep it short and relevant aswell as direct answer to the query.