Anyone used linkjuicer?

nj1485

Registered Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
60
Reaction score
203
I am considering trying linkjuicer but don't know if it actually works.
If anyone has tried, are they reliable?

Don't want to throw away $37 a month.
 
Thanks, will give it a try.
 
giving linkjuice a try need links for my bloggs will tell you how well i get on.

Logged in and it asked me to fill out for for a whole bunch of social networks which i did then i cross referenced some of my social networking website added a few personal details and hey presto.

checked my website backlinks at *http:*//urlrate.*com/
will check back soon to see how well i do.
if anyone knows of a good backlink checking website i would appreciate it
 
Im one of beta testers. Tool is preety decent, works good and theres never problems with it. When it gets more networks added it can be a total killer
 
Guys should we spin the "long text" field ? Not doing it won't harm my site, correct? CMIIW
 
I spun the long text field. its actually kind fun to work witht he spyntax. It kind of feels like like coding. Or word games.
 
I'm testing it on some white/light-gray hat sites. It does what it says on the box, and once I get a campaign set up, it indeed works while I play games. And, it is good for those sites where getting an SE ban is worth avoiding.

All in all, LinkJuicer is a great idea that has been frustratingly nerfed by the fact that the developer is thinking way too small. And I dislike anything that takes away my ability to choose my own risk level.


It's not automated enough, or scaleable enough. Even with outsourcing. If you want to roll a million URLs through (I've had sites nearly that big), forget it, even if he did make it possible to have that many "campaigns," you'd have to hire all of India and China just to type in URLs and do the spyntaxing.

Also, even though you can have 50 "campaigns," your entire account only gets about 20 links/day--randomly spread among them. Even if the developer gets the other 10 social media sites in, that'll still only bring in 40 links/day. That's not nearly enough.

I had contacted the developer about larger accounts, but the more I think about it, I've pretty much come to the conclusion that this isn't going to ever be robust enough for my needs. It just couldn't handle, say, a 10000+ URL site. Much less 10 or 20 of them!

Something more along the lines of SimplifiedSES's Link Exchange service is more what I'm after. Or a different one that's supposed to come out soon. I want lots of links, to lots of pages. All automatic, including entering URLs into the system. And the links come in as fast as I want, to the exact pages I want. And no pages that get no links because the randomizer didn't land on them that day (or the next day or the next day or the next day...).

LinkJuicer is like a Lamborghini that's been set so it can only go 20MPH, "so you won't get any tickets and the roads stay safe." If I wanted to drive slow, I wouldn't be on BLACK Hat World!
 
I use it. It works for me. I use it on all kinds of sites that I've set up. It's better than manually bookmarking all that. For maximum exposure, I'd sign up for two accounts or do your regular bookmarking in addition to it.
 
I signed up for it.
Can someone explain the optimum way to do the spyntax for tags, titles and short text? Sites doesn't explain it great. Thanks
 
I think [FONT=&quot]manually submissions and link exchange are more effective than using tools for submission.


________________________________________________
http://www.webexcelsolutions.com/seo/search-engine-optimization.htm | http://forums.webexcelsolutions.com
[/FONT]
 
I think [FONT=&quot]manually submissions and link exchange are more effective than using tools for submission.


________________________________________________
http://www.webexcelsolutions.com/seo/search-engine-optimization.htm | http://forums.webexcelsolutions.com
[/FONT]

it may be more effective but its also time consuming. Time = Money
lol

Anyway I have used Link Juicer.. with the trial period it was alright. it was kind of slow but thats what they said it would do. I was thinking about joining with SSEC what do you think?
 
Im trialling it now and I can see it is good for now. Well its good if you only want to drive a few more links to some whiteish hat sites. However to get a long running campaign you will need to include a rather advanced "spyntax" (God I hate having to put that word towards something that has been around so long) text, I mean something with literally thousands of possible combinations so your links aren't lost in the dupe content filter.

the price is quite cheap for what it is proposing to do and is good for people starting out (if it pans out how its starting to appear) but will eventually lose its power due to lack of supported sites, the fact it only accepts one account per site and its link limitation.

I realise the reason for the limits is to stop it getting over saturated so quick but once these accounts start to get banned or lose their PR it will no longer be of any use.

For now its ok for those starting out and not wanting to spend much money but I get the feeling it is only gonna be good as a supplemental link source rather than a powerful link resource. Only time will really tell though.
 
I'm planning to use it on a whitehat site and since my SEO related knowledge is very low let me ask you guys in simple words... Does it really bring traffic to a new site ?
 
I dont think its to bring in traffic, but build your backlinks. From what I see, the sites that your data gets posted to, arent probably going to be highly visited and revisited sites.

IMO, twitter should be added to this service, i mean, as a member of twitter I get about 2 new followers every day. If, say, 100 people associated an account with this service, then these accounts would gain followers daily, and the accounts would tweet tweets designated by all the participants. This could generate traffic imo.

I emailed him but he didn't respond, if you like this idea you too should email him about this.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your input adbox. Really appreciate it.
 
Back
Top