Anyone tried Sick Submitter 3.0?

T

timtation

Registered Member

Dec 15, 2010

59

0

• Feb 15, 2011

• #1

An updated version just came out. Has anyone used it? How is it?

 

G

gober

Newbie

Feb 9, 2011

14

0

• Feb 15, 2011

• #2

I can't installed it on my comp, it says need .Net V4

Anyone get the same message?

 

cyberroot

BANNED

Jul 24, 2010

343

72

• Feb 15, 2011

• #3

download .net 4.0 its free and then try to install it !

 

S

sknight

Newbie

Nov 26, 2010

32

11

• Feb 15, 2011

• #4

I got it. $20 a month .. user contributed packets of sites .. deal of the month I say

 

ericsson

Elite Member

Apr 25, 2009

2,640

8,233

• Feb 15, 2011

• #5

 

G

gober

Newbie

Feb 9, 2011

14

0

• Feb 15, 2011

• #6

cyberroot said:

download .net 4.0 its free and then try to install it !

Click to expand...

Thanks mate

 

altschule

Regular Member

Sep 1, 2010

282

186

• Feb 15, 2011

• #7

Where are these contributed packets?

 

V

vallento

Regular Member

Sep 6, 2010

237

68

• Feb 15, 2011

• #8

For the submitter part of it I don't see much difference between this new version and the old. Only thing is that its faster to switch between the loaded packages in the submitter which sometimes toke ages in the old version.

 

ericsson

Elite Member

Apr 25, 2009

2,640

8,233

• Feb 15, 2011

• #9

There is better templates, faster removal of links, up to 50 threads now.. Etc.

There is alot of improvement from the old SS.

 

S

sknight

Newbie

Nov 26, 2010

32

11

• Feb 15, 2011

• #10

Put this at the end of the url for the sick site and get it for $12.95 a month ..

/sick-submitter-bfso-special/

 

ericsson

Elite Member

Apr 25, 2009

2,640

8,233

• Feb 15, 2011

• #11

 

4

4trsuted

Regular Member

Apr 9, 2010

371

207

• Feb 15, 2011

• #12

Tried it and got success rate almost twice as low as comparing to rank builder. Though it has pretty good pinging, and rss section, that I use only now from sick submitter. But for such low price it's pretty good. Dont expect stunning results with it.

 

ericsson

Elite Member

Apr 25, 2009

2,640

8,233

• Feb 15, 2011

• #13

 

T

TehBoss

Newbie

Jan 3, 2010

29

9

• Feb 16, 2011

• #14

Success rates depend on the packets most of the time, some sites have changed and so they don't work. I think it's great software and for $13... people try and pirate this software but come on, it's so cheap anybody can buy it and you get the genuine updated version.

 

blackhattrial

Regular Member

Jul 22, 2008

410

132

• Mar 2, 2011

• #15

 

ericsson

Elite Member

Apr 25, 2009

2,640

8,233

• Mar 2, 2011

• #16

 

photoads

Regular Member

Jan 16, 2007

282

99

• Mar 3, 2011

• #17

 

L

Longover

Power Member

Jun 9, 2008

659

347

• Mar 26, 2011

• #18

The program is ok but the creator is a d*** head. I guess you get what you pay for in terms of support...

 

wannabie

Elite Member

Mar 11, 2009

3,798

2,971

• Mar 26, 2011

• #19

Can SS submit to press release sites?

 

J

jb2008

Senior Member

Jul 15, 2010

1,158

976

• Mar 26, 2011

• #20

Making a forum poster based on .NET is going to be extremely slow. Indeed, I couldn't tolerate how sick at just 10 threads froze up my entire computer, while I can run Xrumer at 50 threads and have no problems in getting on with my other activities on my laptop. I know it can't be compared to XR but you would expect Xrumer to be more resource intensive the way people talk about it. After a few months going crazy with sick and no results I just said screw it and bought Xrumer. Best decision I ever made.