Anyone tried DripApps Web 2.0 ranking method using tinyurls and GSA?

invest207 · Apr 14, 2015

I just found this:
http://dripapps.com/penny-rankings/

It involves generating 100-150 tinyurls that point to your website or web 2.0 and then blasting those urls using Fiver $5 GSA gigs.
It says that the tinyurl works as a "coffee filter" that keeps the spam out and passes only the authority to your web 2.0

Anyone tried it yet?

Jallen289 · Apr 14, 2015

sounds intriguing!!

cottonwolf · Apr 14, 2015

That's your site, isnt it.
You can always set up a couple of yourls installs that you control on some hosting accounts, but alas, these won't have any authority to absorb penalties.
Bitly and tinyurls can absorb them obviously.
Gonna need to try this out

invest207 said:
I just found this:
http://dripapps.com/penny-rankings/

It involves generating 100-150 tinyurls that point to your website or web 2.0 and then blasting those urls using Fiver $5 GSA gigs.
It says that the tinyurl works as a "coffee filter" that keeps the spam out and passes only the authority to your web 2.0

Anyone tried it yet?

invest207 · Apr 14, 2015

cottonwolf said:
That's your site, isnt it.
You can always set up a couple of yourls installs that you control on some hosting accounts, but alas, these won't have any authority to absorb penalties.
Bitly and tinyurls can absorb them obviously.
Gonna need to try this out

Its not my site. I think it belongs to this guy and he is also a member here:
http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/members/635829-wyattjozwowski.html

Suits · Apr 14, 2015

Sounds like it should work, its pretty similar to basic churn and burn practice. Its basically blasting a parasite with a redirect filter, you can blast a parasite without that and it would probably work more or less the same.

Either way I personally wouldn't look at it as a long term ranking strategy.

invest207 · Apr 15, 2015

I can confirm that this strategy works. I tried it on a 100k/month searches kw and 24 hours later I was ranking first page with a youtube video.
All I did was build 100 tinyurls and then blast a 10k fiverr GSA blast on them.
I will try now the same strategy but using a facebook page.
I will let you guy know.

Suits · Apr 15, 2015

invest207 said:
I can confirm that this strategy works. I tried it on a 100k/month searches kw and 24 hours later I was ranking first page with a youtube video.
All I did was build 100 tinyurls and then blast a 10k fiverr GSA blast on them.
I will try now the same strategy but using a facebook page.
I will let you guy know.

Great stuff! Was that with no views or anything else? Just the tinyurls and GSA blast?

invest207 · Apr 15, 2015

Suits said:
Great stuff! Was that with no views or anything else? Just the tinyurls and GSA blast?

It was a video i uploaded 3 weeks ago but never had time to do any SEO on it. It had about 100 views.

jmcgoose · Apr 15, 2015

invest207 said:
I can confirm that this strategy works. I tried it on a 100k/month searches kw and 24 hours later I was ranking first page with a youtube video.
All I did was build 100 tinyurls and then blast a 10k fiverr GSA blast on them.
I will try now the same strategy but using a facebook page.
I will let you guy know.

what kind of anchor % did you use?

Honestly I havent seen any churn and burn sites rank within short period of time since a long time (1st page rankings) for anything competitive/high monthly searches. Maybe since your video is 3 weeks old that helped for faster results.

invest207 · Apr 15, 2015

jmcgoose said:
what kind of anchor % did you use?

Honestly I havent seen any churn and burn sites rank within short period of time since a long time (1st page rankings) for anything competitive/high monthly searches. Maybe since your video is 3 weeks old that helped for faster results.

Only 1 kw. No naked or generic kw were used.
The kw was also present in the video title.

thebat1980 · Apr 16, 2015

I'm going to have a play and report bck

Kingjay · Apr 16, 2015

DripWay said:
Hey jmcgoose,

I'm Alex from DripApps, the one who founded the method (Wyatt made the video). Just a little background on the method, and why it works so quickly. Normally, you're able to blast churn and burn sites, and have them rank within a week or two. With YouTube videos, this type of spam was great for quick rankings, but got "patched"/made less efficient due to the (not so publicly announced) updates months ago. Back then, YouTube videos would take the spam effect very lightly (not as much after the update), but with this TinyURL, the first hit is taken from the TinyURL, and then YouTube only gets the good link juice.

Invest207, I'm glad you're having success with this method. We have lots of other methods on our blog that you can check out, lots of great free training. YouTube owns Google, and although Facebook can also work with this method, YouTube will always work better for the sole reason of ownership. We've done lots of tests, and found this to be the case. You can see the list of our 101 recommended web 2.0 properties here: https://secure.dripapps.com/download-101-web-2-list

Alex

Is there any risk for getting your youtube account banned with this? I have a few weeks old youtube video on a relatively new channel I'd like to test it on, but it's on my main gmail account so don't know if I want to risk it...

invest207 · Apr 16, 2015

Kingjay said:
Is there any risk for getting your youtube account banned with this? I have a few weeks old youtube video on a relatively new channel I'd like to test it on, but it's on my main gmail account so don't know if I want to risk it...

i have also been using my own account. So far no bans

invest207 · Apr 17, 2015

So far no movements in serps with the facebook page.
Still out of top 100
But the good thing is I managed to rank another video on 1st page.

Ed4252 · Apr 17, 2015

Do people use this method on money sites?
What's so different about using the tinyurl method than just blasting it on a money site?
Will the backlinks still show up on ahrefs if I use this method on a money site?

invest207 · Apr 17, 2015

Ed4252 said:
Do people use this method on money sites?
What's so different about using the tinyurl method than just blasting it on a money site?
Will the backlinks still show up on ahrefs if I use this method on a money site?

Who cares if they show or not?
Its important to rank.

lingy21 · Apr 18, 2015

I've just tried this with a weebly site for a low comp keyword, Just fired a load of scrapebox comments & xrumer profiles at the Tiny URL's will report back when i see anything changing.

godspeed007 · Apr 18, 2015

It works. I have tried with 3 shorteners and it ranked. Now I'm thinking to go with 100 level. That would give skyrocket ranking I guess. Social shorteners such as bufferapp shortener would work good as well.

lingy21 · Apr 18, 2015

godspeed007 said:
It works. I have tried with 3 shorteners and it ranked. Now I'm thinking to go with 100 level. That would give skyrocket ranking I guess. Social shorteners such as bufferapp shortener would work good as well.

Thats good to hear, hopefully should see some changes with in the next few days. What were you ranking, was it a youtube vid? and approximately how many links did you throw at it?

Thanks

FilipMKD · Apr 18, 2015

Testing out this with a website and keyword with 15k monthly searches.

Made 250 tiny urls and a gsa ser campaign with spammy engines. Will blast the shit out of it and report back here soon.

Anyone tried DripApps Web 2.0 ranking method using tinyurls and GSA?

Senior Member

Newbie

Regular Member

Senior Member

Newbie

Senior Member

Newbie

Senior Member

Junior Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Junior Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Power Member

Senior Member

Junior Member

BANNED

Junior Member

Regular Member

Main Menu

Marketplace

Making Money

BlackHatWorld

Other