Anyone Experimented with Longer Form Shorts (Over 45s)?

Toluwani7

BANNED
Joined
Oct 20, 2025
Messages
14
Reaction score
17
I’ve seen a few creators upload “longer Shorts” that go close to 60 seconds, and they seem to perform better in retention.
Maybe the algo is favoring more context-heavy content now?
Would love to know if anyone else tested the same. do 55s outperform 20s in your niche?
 
Depends

Faceless o dopamine boost shorts, no longer than 20s

A real person with some branding giving you a solution of something o talking about something that could have passed to you, it's ok go long and even consume the 3 minutes
 
I’ve seen a few creators upload “longer Shorts” that go close to 60 seconds, and they seem to perform better in retention.
Maybe the algo is favoring more context-heavy content now?
Would love to know if anyone else tested the same. do 55s outperform 20s in your niche?
Not always long shorts perform well. It depends on content quality. Someone times small shorts also perform well. You just have to keep the viewer hooked for entire duration.
 
Only works for quality content, like something interesting that viewers will stay and watch the full video. But other niches like faceless, AI content, etc., would be better if it's just like less than 15 seconds.
 
It depends on your niche, but generally yes — 50–60s Shorts often perform better now because YouTube’s algorithm favors content that keeps viewers engaged longer and delivers full context. However, the key is retention, not length — a 20s clip with 90% watch time can still outperform a 55s one with 60%.
 
YouTube now seems to reward Shorts that keep people watching, so slightly longer videos often do better.
 
Yes, 50–60s Shorts often outperform 15–20s in niches where context matters tutorials, storytelling, or explainer content because watch time and retention signals are stronger.
 
My niche responds better to short videos. For niches that demand deeper context, formats like storytimes/tutorials would probably work better.
 
Yes is better to be longer shorts as youtube take in consideration the watch time so like 50 sec will be better than something shorter
 
I’ve seen a few creators upload “longer Shorts” that go close to 60 seconds, and they seem to perform better in retention.
Maybe the algo is favoring more context-heavy content now?
Would love to know if anyone else tested the same. do 55s outperform 20s in your niche?
Algorithms now prioritize context rich Shorts which sustain viewer attention and session duration leading to broader reach and engagement
 
Yes, longer Shorts (45–60s) can perform better if they tell a complete story or build suspense. YouTube’s algorithm now rewards strong retention more than duration so if viewers stay till the end, longer Shorts win.
 
Yeah Ive noticed the same trend Longer Shorts seem to hold viewers better especially when there’s a story or clear hook YouTubes algo definitely values watch time more now.
 
Back
Top