Any reviews for high pr society?

Great comments, Gary.

The entire point of the network is to be more cost effective for MAJORITY of people. If you use full tilt then you're totally right. Our goal with making it pay-as-you-go instead of a monthly flat fee it so most people get better bang for their buck.

Regarding site PR, there was a test of 560 articles on BMR and it had an average PR of 1.82. Our average PR is 2.78. Google themselves state that PR is on an exponential scale, meaning a link on a PR2 is worth 10x a link on a PR1. By that same logic, our links are conveying roughly 10x the power.

I can't speak directly to the other services as I haven't used them at all. I've not read anything really positive about them that made me want to hop on.

I've heard Blog Blueprint can have 300 OBL. We average 15 OBL with a max at around 30. I've already read it's the "poor man's linkvana", which we all know isn't as effective as it was 6 months ago. And others complained about them taking sites offline, having exit popups for their service, and posting to PR0s.


In any event, the service is exactly what it claims to be. It's suitable for a lot of people, but probably not you since you max out your BMR. There are no gimmicks, goofy word press plugins, link swaps, software installs, or anything like that.

But if you want to be on the (by far) highest PR network with low OBL then you can.

dennis123 said:

BUMP BUMP BUMP

What is the PR of the pages the articles/comments land on? With BMR they land on the homepage and slide off to an inner page after a (short) while. How does that work with HighPR society?

Click to expand...

This site works like every other article network. Your article will be on a new page so it has a PR of NA. We do offer "home page links" which are blog roll links that are permanent but have a monthly expense. Articles/comments are a one time cost.

The benefit that SEOs go for is the article will be linked from the home page which has a lot of PR AND your link exists on a site that Google says has authority (PR). That's why these articles convey great ranking benefits using fewer articles.

Hey Extropy I do understand your points. My main thing is to be a little more fair with people (like me) who plan to use the service on a monthly basis for around 2k links per month it would be nice to see some sort of a discount. Otherwise the prices just aren't competitive in any way.

This is customary for ANY service that offers one time fee services and subscription based ones, the subscription based price is always cheaper as it provides incentive for customers to subscribe as opposed to just buying something once.

In any case, it is your prerogative. If/When you guys do decide to offer a more reasonable price for people who wish to use the service for the long haul and not just hit it and quit it I'll most likely be keen on giving it a spin.

Gary Becks said:

Hey Extropy I do understand your points. My main thing is to be a little more fair with people (like me) who plan to use the service on a monthly basis for around 2k links per month it would be nice to see some sort of a discount.

Click to expand...

Good point... We've talked a bit about making 'packages' but have stayed away because we don't want to mess over the casual guy. But I guess the flip side is the uber-power-volume guys may pay more.

I'll talk it over with the team tomorrow and see if we can come up with something that'll work for you. And I appreciate you being honest. irate14:

HKSEO Rotzee said:

You said that UAW's article were the same as HPS's articles, just cheaper. I said, no..they aren't. HPS articles are higher quality and more effective article for article. I said test it out for yourself, you can even double or triple the articles you use at UAW in the test against HPS and you will see that HPS articles are more effective.

Click to expand...

Well, considering the pricing structure, as per my above calculations, your network is 135x more expensive. So doubling or tripling the articles I use with UAW wouldn't be an accurate comparison, would it now?

HKSEO Rotzee said:

(That being said, You do realize that when I run 3 or 4 articles I meant to spin each one hundreds of times, right. Against 2 articles spun 100 each through us. So 400 UAW vs 200 HPS - See if they are "the same."

Click to expand...

Uhm, 400 UAW articles is more like 3 HPS articles, if we are to take pricing into account.

HKSEO Rotzee said:

Um..you do realize we can see anything you do with our tools anyway lol. I can log in as you right now and read every article you've posted, every keyword.

Click to expand...

You do realize I wouldn't run the test using my own account, right? But good to know that you have the habit of spying on your users' accounts.

HKSEO Rotzee said:

I wasn't asking for OURS, I would just need to know the UAW keyword and URL so that I know it is ranking as you say. I mean, how do I know you won't inflate the rankings? Use something that is already ranking? etc

Click to expand...

Fairly easy to determine post testing. Keep in mind that, board pissing aside, I have no horse in this race. If your network proves to be all that, then I won't be stupid enough not to use it just because we had an initial difference of opinion. It's all about the money.

HKSEO Rotzee said:

I've done the tests, I know the results. We can do a private test just between me and you, if you think I would fix the test because of the test being public. I have no reason to lie...I'll give you the credits, so I make no money...and you can do the test for yourself. I've done the tests, I know, but If you think a UAW article is the same as a HPS then I say test it and see.

Click to expand...

While I do appreciate the offer, not exactly a whole lot of investment here. I'm paying for UAW already, so no cost there. And considering that we're running a 1:135 comparison between HPS and UAW, buying HPS credits for this comparison won't exactly put me in the poorhouse.

I read the whole threat, and have a question on the comparison of HPS and BMR.... Here's:

In BMR I should pay for the lowest plan $59 monthly. If I wanna get 1000 links from that network will need 1000 articles of 150 words (each one cost 1$) that will be 1059$ for 1000 links from BMR.

In HPS to get 1000 links I will need 3000 credits, with cost 75$.

I don't get the "better price" of BMR that Gary said.

Maybe Im wrong, Im looking to buy a subscription of private blog network, but right now don't know what is better.

Thanks

ccshack said:

I read the whole threat, and have a question on the comparison of HPS and BMR.... Here's:

In BMR I should pay for the lowest plan $59 monthly. If I wanna get 1000 links from that network will need 1000 articles of 150 words (each one cost 1$) that will be 1059$ for 1000 links from BMR.

In HPS to get 1000 links I will need 3000 credits, with cost 75$.

I don't get the "better price" of BMR that Gary said.

Maybe Im wrong, Im looking to buy a subscription of private blog network, but right now don't know what is better.

Thanks

Click to expand...

My price does not include the cost of writing. And trust me, in terms of the longevity of a network - you'll see why BMR doesn't allow spun content and also why their links pack more of a punch due to this as well.

ccshack said:

I read the whole threat, and have a question on the comparison of HPS and BMR.... Here's:

In BMR I should pay for the lowest plan $59 monthly. If I wanna get 1000 links from that network will need 1000 articles of 150 words (each one cost 1$) that will be 1059$ for 1000 links from BMR.

In HPS to get 1000 links I will need 3000 credits, with cost 75$.

I don't get the "better price" of BMR that Gary said.

Maybe Im wrong, Im looking to buy a subscription of private blog network, but right now don't know what is better.

Thanks

Click to expand...

That's why I say that we're cheaper for most people. The hardcore guys churning out 1000 articles a day are a unique animal.

One other thing to know is that we offer a guarantee of PR on the home page links. If a site drops rank, we move you to another one for free automatically. If a site raises rank, we give that to you for free. So you're covered either way.

And comparing UAW to this is silly. BMR is a much better comparison. At the end of the day a combination of the volume/low quality links (UAW) with the good links (HPS/BMR) will give better results than either alone.

DamageX said:

Well, considering the pricing structure, as per my above calculations, your network is 135x more expensive. So doubling or tripling the articles I use with UAW wouldn't be an accurate comparison, would it now?

Click to expand...

Ok, do whatever you need to do brother.

Uhm, 400 UAW articles is more like 3 HPS articles, if we are to take pricing into account.

Click to expand...

Lol, well thats kind of what I've been saying the whole time. You were the one who said UAW articles were the same as HPS articles. I said they weren't...that HPS were higher quality and worth more. Truthfully, it probably depends on what previous link building has been done before. They are different tools meant to be used differently. Duct tape and Scotch tape, different prices and used differently for different things.

You do realize I wouldn't run the test using my own account, right? But good to know that you have the habit of spying on your users' accounts.

Click to expand...

When did I say I have a habit of spying on customers? Lol do you typically put words in peoples mouths your talking to or did you really just not understand what you were reading? Here..let me highlight some keywords in what I actually said..they are small words..but important ones in communicating my actual message.

I said - "Um..you do realize we can see anything you do with our tools anyway lol. I can log in as you right now and read every article you've posted, every keyword.

I wasn't asking for OURS, I would just need to know the UAW keyword and URL so that I know it is ranking as you say".

I said we had the ability, not the habit of. I then clarified the only thing we were interested in checking.

Fairly easy to determine post testing. Keep in mind that, board pissing aside, I have no horse in this race. If your network proves to be all that, then I won't be stupid enough not to use it just because we had an initial difference of opinion. It's all about the money.

Click to expand...

I don't know that, lol. For all I know, you work for UAW. You could even be the owner.

While I do appreciate the offer, not exactly a whole lot of investment here. I'm paying for UAW already, so no cost there. And considering that we're running a 1:135 comparison between HPS and UAW, buying HPS credits for this comparison won't exactly put me in the poorhouse

Click to expand...

Your "test" doesn't seem to clear to me as to what your going to try and prove. I'm not really sure how its going to work, like everyone has said here...its apples to oranges. High volume links and high quality links are different and have the best results when used together...like I told you, I don't disagree with high volume links....we sell them. HPS just aren't "those type of links"...and so, they don't cost the same...and you don't need as many.

Can you explain exactly what your going to do and what its supposed to "prove".

Extropy said:

That's why I say that we're cheaper for most people. The hardcore guys churning out 1000 articles a day are a unique animal.

Click to expand...

Uhm... I said 10 articles per day. Difference is, with UAW they get listed on 400+ blogs. With you, if I want 4000 spots, that's gonna set me back more than UAW costs in a month.

And yeah, I know, you consider UAW to be shit and would recommend me to use piece-of-shit dripfeedblasts which both you and I know ain't worth shit. I can achieve better results with a single Fiverr blast than I got from DFB in a full month.

Bottom line, let's compare the price and effects, pound for pound. According to the pricing 3 articles on HPS equal 400 listings on the "shitty" UAW. And I just don't see the "quality" on your end making up for the 1:135 pricing ratio. And I don't give a flying fuck if you think you can't compare HPS to UAW. They list articles, you list articles, they charge $67/mo, you charge $9,000/mo. So kindly shut the fuck up about unfair comparison.

Convince me that your stuff is worth the 135 price multiplier and I'll use you and even recommend you. But don't try to weasel your way out of providing proper explanations by acting all butthurt because I, as a client of yours, had the audacity of comparing you to an "inferior" service.

HKSEO Rotzee said:

its apples to oranges

Click to expand...

No, it's not, you dumb fuck. You list articles, they list articles. They charge $67/mo, you charge $9,000/mo. Surely you must have passed grade school maths?

As I've been saying, show me that your links are worth $9,000/mo and I won't have a problem buying and even recommending you. And stop trying to weasel your way out of a comparison based on actual facts and not "quality".

DamageX said:

No, it's not, you dumb fuck. You list articles, they list articles. They charge $67/mo, you charge $9,000/mo. Surely you must have passed grade school maths?

As I've been saying, show me that your links are worth $9,000/mo and I won't have a problem buying and even recommending you. And stop trying to weasel your way out of a comparison based on actual facts and not "quality".

Click to expand...

By your logic, we charge $0 per month and they are $67/month so we are infinitely cheaper.

I'm not sure why you are getting so butt-hurt that one service is more expensive than another in a given scenario. We could easily add up the cost of article writing so BMR is more expensive since it's $1 per.

Bottom line: Pick the service that works the best for you in your situation. You obviously don't like our pay-as-you-use-it model and have a lot of articles sitting around you can use. Great.

It isn't worth a drawn out discussion that we disagree over the best value.

I'd be interested if anyone else has any first-hand experience using High PR Society... I've signed up for an account but haven't funded it yet.

I think the points brought up in the "discussion" above are valuable things to think about... but mainly I'm interested in results... anyone have them, good or bad?

Also, if I sign up for a small monthly fee to test out, if I like it can I easily change my monthly fee (or cancel if I use cc)?

dennis123 said:

i once had an argue with hkseo rotzee on warriorforum quiet a while ago, i am banned there now, not due to him btw. Okay to the point, hkseo rotzee told me he rather didn't have me as a customer i think the same might apply to you damage

Click to expand...

lmao!

Hey, just subbed for 10,000 credits to try it out.

3 pr 5's, 25 pr 4's, 1 pr2

8 of the sites have no pr at all, and you label them as pr4. Do I just delete these and re-add or do i lose the credits?

What platform are sites in the network based on? Is it Wordpress or something custom? Could we see a sample site from the network?

Thanks!

dennis123 said:

Just heart that high PR society does use a simliar system to BMR, the articles that you submit do land on the homepage first and slide off to an innerpage. So from that perspective it's indeed very comparable to BuildMyRank, but where BMR costs around $1069,- to submit a 1000 posts, the high PR society only costs $75,- to get 1000 posts submitted. Thats changes the whole situation a LOT. Guess I'm gonna sign up right away and say fuck BMR with there damn policy.

Click to expand...

Bwahaha! FINALLY!..thats what we've been saying the whole time lol.

Like we said, for most people..are pricing makes sense. We have a lot of happy customers that thank us for setting it up this way. Of course there will always be people who use tools differently and our price won't make sense to them, But you can't make everyone happy and to most of our customers..they love the pricing.

purecig said:

Hey, just subbed for 10,000 credits to try it out.

3 pr 5's, 25 pr 4's, 1 pr2

8 of the sites have no pr at all, and you label them as pr4. Do I just delete these and re-add or do i lose the credits?

Click to expand...

You can delete and re-add them..within 24hrs you will get refunded credits automatically. We do a PR check once a week (and will be doing it again in a few hours), and if your PR dropped, we will automatically move them, so no worries.

If you ever notice and don't feel like waiting for our in house PR update, you can always send in a trouble ticket and we will fix it right then.

DamageX said:

No, it's not, you dumb fuck.

Click to expand...

Dumb fuck? lol..man...I literally choke out 8 guys like you before lunch most days at my gym...don't get "tuff" with me on the internet, im not impressed. Keep it civil.

You list articles, they list articles. They charge $67/mo, you charge $9,000/mo. Surely you must have passed grade school maths?

Click to expand...

First of all...I don't charge 9000/month. If you want to buy 9000 dollars worth of High PR articles a month...I guess you could do that...but I don't know anyone that does that. What kind of retarded SEO strategy, from what busted WSO, did you get that from? Most people don't have 400 sites they are ranking in competitive SERPS so I don't know anyone in this situation where this math makes sense.

Here is the argument?you said?

So say I want to publish 2 articles a day, to be listed on 400 sites each. This would add up to 3 credits/article x 2 articles x 400 (blogs) = 2400 credits. At $0.025/credit, 2400 credits would run you $60. PER DAY.

Sorry, I'll be cancelling and going back to UAW. Had good results with it and I see no reason to overpay so grossly, for basically the same service.
'Cause if I do a run of 10 articles daily, to 400 blogs, I end up paying $9,000 per month.

Click to expand...

Here is where your MATH is all screwed up and the whole thing we are arguing...
1. You call it the same service...IT...ISN'T...THE...SAME..SERVICE. One offers cheap, high volume/low quality links. I don't call it low quality as in "Shitty", like you keep referring to them. We sell high volume/low quality links..I don't think they are shitty..they are cheap and meant to be used WITH high quality links.

2. Most users don't have 400 sites. Some have a couple, some have one, some have 10 or 20. Most have less than 5, which is why we made it cheaper for them.

Note: If you do have 400 sites, then you should just have your own network anyway and shouldn't even be talking to us.

As I've been saying, show me that your links are worth $9,000/mo and I won't have a problem buying and even recommending you.

Click to expand...

Ok, if we are going to do your math, if you know what your doing and have 400 ranking blogs making even 3.00 a day each...you'd be making 36,000 a month and 9,000 a month to rank them competitively (And yes, your going to need High PR back links to rank competitively post Panda) can make total sense giving you a 27,000.00 a month profit. Although like we said....you'd be smarter to mix low quality WITH high quality for diversity.

Unless you're trying to say you're going to rank 400 blogs with just UAW, then I can't even talk to you, because you're looney.

And stop trying to weasel your way out of a comparison based on actual facts and not "quality".

Click to expand...

Quality is a fact, there is no weasel about it..hell, I offered you free credits to try it out for free. On what planet is that weaseling out of anything? At any rate, I think I?m arguing dumb math with you?it was ok when I was waiting for my lunch to cook?.you?re the only one here who doesn?t seem to get the differences.

vision2003 said:

What platform are sites in the network based on? Is it Wordpress or something custom? Could we see a sample site from the network?

Thanks!

Click to expand...

Its totally custom because wordpress is too inefficient and because it has a footprint. When you purchase links, you receive a report with your links, if you don't like it..you have 24 hours to delete and you will be refunded your credits =)