Any faster alternative to ScrapeBox links checker ?

Hey guys,
The SB links checker is very slow, even with a good VPS and low "Maximum connexions".
I know that the free SB checker is faster, but I have to note the anchor text used in the BL.
Is there any faster alternative to ScrapeBox links checker ?
Cheers.

Xrumer's links checker is many, many times faster than anything I've seen from scrapebox.

nipester said:

Xrumer's links checker is many, many times faster than anything I've seen from scrapebox.

Click to expand...

I haven't tried it myself, but i have heard the same

I no longer own xrumer, has someone tested any other tool ?
SB is great but I think Sweetfunny should work to improve the speed of links checker.

Backlink Falcon is faster, I have tested it against any link checker I could get my hands on and it beats them by a mile and yes, I am the guy that has developed it, but that doesn't change the reality.

Not sure about blog comments though (I've run extensive tests with pretty much all other kinds of backlinks), SB might be better at handling them, I haven't messed with comments in a long time. BTW, never knew that Xrumer had a link checker, I will check it out now

xpleet, PM me and I can send you a free license sometime tomorrow; only xpleet, I will ignore any other PMs

nipester said:

Xrumer's links checker is many, many times faster than anything I've seen from scrapebox.

Click to expand...

Xrumer is also many times more expensive than anything I've seen from ScrapeBox. It's a great tool sure, but at $650 up front then $120/yr that's some serious coin to suggest to someone simply looking for a link checker.

http://www.scrapebox.com/videos/sbxr/

ScrapeBox is faster than XRumer, i used the same list (one of Xrumers own forum link lists), same number of connections, checking for the same site and started and the same time. I didn't know XR had a link checker until i read your post, so maybe i'm missing a setting or something? If so let me know and i'll rerun it.

I though XR would be faster too because ScrapeBox is doing a lot more things which add overhead like updating the grid status/colors, it's extracting the anchor text, keeping an index of the status to enable exporting the links to txt, csv, xls or html page etc. But the longer it ran the more SB pulled away from it.

Hey hpv222, thank you so much for the license.
I have just tested "Backlink Falcon" and it's crazy fast !
Checked 13929 AA wordpress list in 1h 7min.
I checked the same list using ScrapeBox in 8h 40min.
Conclusion: Backlink Falcon is almost 8 times faster than SB.

Settings used :
Connexions: 30
Timeout: 90
VPS connexion is 100 Mbps.
Bandwisth used for this test: 12450 MB (got this info from SB)

I have a small suggestion to :

@hpv222: I think you should allow customization of Max threads and Timeout, so we can choose any number for these values.

@Sweetfunny: I feel that links checker was faster in some old SB versions (please don't ask me wish one ). Maybe you should work to optimize links checker in the next updates. It's fast in small pages size (like profiles pages) but very slow in pages with too much content (likes spammed blogs with tons of comments).
Also try to add "minimize button" to the window of links checker.

This is the fastest link checker that I ever used. http://www.scrapebox.com/free-link-checker

works quickly with a short timeout is a lot of links can be omitted.

why / free-link-checker is faster than that of the SB? THIS is the same

Please more about backlink Falcon