Anti‑Detect Browsers Overview of Features and testing experience

Have you ever used browser fingerprint detection tools to test the anonymity features of these anti-detection browsers?
 
Advertise on BHW
BitBrowser 1 said:
Have you ever used browser fingerprint detection tools to test the anonymity features of these anti-detection browsers?
Click to expand...
Yeah, I've tried many browser-fingerprint detection tools-essentially a check for any weak point that one could imagine. With the public proxies, most of the issues pop up because they leak inconsistencies all over the place. But the moment I switch to my proxies tied to real SIMs and real devices, stability jumps up big time and the success rate grows dramatically.
but sometimes even all this measures are are useless against mass account blocking and other stuff. So I stick to real smartphones + LP2, works great for me.
 
Gr33n_b3ll said:
Yeah, I've tried many browser-fingerprint detection tools-essentially a check for any weak point that one could imagine. With the public proxies, most of the issues pop up because they leak inconsistencies all over the place. But the moment I switch to my proxies tied to real SIMs and real devices, stability jumps up big time and the success rate grows dramatically.
but sometimes even all this measures are are useless against mass account blocking and other stuff. So I stick to real smartphones + LP2, works great for me.
Click to expand...
Does it sound like most of your testing is based on mobile devices?
 
if i have mcc with alot of accounts, that i access through virtual machines, how can i put anti detect to work?
 
banjicom said:
Please drop a video link, it will really help alot of us who are still new to the anti detect system and trying to learn.
Click to expand...
Let me check with the mods if I am allowed to, there will be a way , I guess.

BitBrowser 1 said:
Have you ever used browser fingerprint detection tools to test the anonymity features of these anti-detection browsers?
Click to expand...
Yea, I attend the vendors conferences and get free trials for things like fingerprintJS and SEON. A techinically not versatile person will definitely run into a wall vs these, Whoever integrates these and wants to be extra careful and requests KYC can be a tough cookie and you have to go very far to beat that.

But, if money is not a dealbreaker, a website has no chance , ever, to detect a sophisticated user, but this goes a bit beyond the standard AD + proxy combo.

capblackhat said:
if i have mcc with alot of accounts, that i access through virtual machines, how can i put anti detect to work?
Click to expand...
The problem with VMs or VBs is , apart from Datacentre location are also the proxy fingerprint and everything on a VM will scream "I am linux", VMs have no real windows drivers and such, it is very very hard to remove all the linux noise.
 
cartiology said:
I agree on the LinkenSphere part, it trully is the goat for basic stuff. There are more complicated solution with custom builds, but they cost a buck...
Click to expand...
Yes, the most custom build would be renting or buying a server that is not based on Linux with an anti detect on top of it and your own proxies.

This, of course is the most expensive method, but as you have correctly stated, sometimes the anti detects can also be just one little component in a bigger architecture.

banjicom said:
Please drop a video link, it will really help alot of us who are still new to the anti detect system and trying to learn.
Click to expand...
With a VIP account I can now receive requests for tutorials, feel free to drop a PM
 
@theusualkeysersoze Thanks for the write up. I'm looking to manage a few IG accounts for personal use, and was leaning towards Multilogin but your writeup is making me think twice. Do you still think LinkenSphere2 is the best?
 
Personally and i think many used before dolphin anty as have free profile and fit most the use i need. I see you didn't include this in your list op but i believe is worth a shot for newbie that don't have or don't want to spend money at beginning is great and simple to use and efficient with mobile or residential proxies
 
theusualkeysersoze said:
I am not affiliated with any anti detect provider and I sue them as tools, the field is dynamic and none of them is the best in every category or feature, it is important to understand how they work, why they work(or do not work). It is always a cat and mouse game vs mainly Google and "anti fraud" providers like SEON et all. One broswer might be the best at soemthing tomorrow and then collapse your whole infrastructure tomorrow. What you want is knowing how the config fields work and how to encapsulate bowser instances("profiles") from eachother. Some of them are consistently bad and the satin gloves are off, no prisoners will be taken, I have seen too many "recommendations" with no explanations for terrible products and terribly bad advise. Many people struggle to understand the concept of proxies and they play an important role in all this. Do not worry, this is a complicated field which requires IT expertise and/or the will to learn and constantly adapt. I will leave out the VM kernel level anti detects, they are far superior to any of the ones that will be mentioned here and they come with cons like exorbitant pricing and infrastructure requirements and they are definitely not for users who are not very very advanced and knowledgeable in IT and development. They rather dereve a separate thread.
Click to expand...
You’ve hit on a critical point! The anti-detect browser landscape demands constant learning and adaptation due to its reactive nature against Google and fraud prevention systems. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of these tools, including proxy management and profile isolation, is far more valuable than blindly following recommendations. It's definitely a field where technical proficiency or a strong desire to acquire it will be key for long-term success.
 
gabrielspecter said:
@theusualkeysersoze Thanks for the write up. I'm looking to manage a few IG accounts for personal use, and was leaning towards Multilogin but your writeup is making me think twice. Do you still think LinkenSphere2 is the best?
Click to expand...
It depends, if we consider the API and automations, ML is better, if we consider core release velocity, ML is better but speed is not always good, this time they all got bit by a total environment leak on iphey.
If we consider the default setting, something unthankfull, they all try to habe reasonable default settings and people think it's plug and play for all, it cannot be if they set masked values to screen resolution and it generates something totally insane, far from your real one, a pixelation mismatch is guaranteed to occur, is hardware concuurency is set higher than what you have available, it can never be a good thing, and ultimately, LS has one extremyl irresponsible setting which multilogin does not even present you with and the default is set to guarantee ip leaks depending on which kinda is used

their warm up cookie bots both equally suck soni have made my own.i mean theyre okay, fpr some things, for orhers not.

overall, between these 2 , it is hard to say which is better, arguably, multilogin is better at creating discrete canvas noise, ls will have a bit more fallout.

ML was subject to ddos attacks lately(badge of honor) with some corresponding downtimes but they have proven to be resilient, ans for what it's worth, they never suffered a hack or data breach, the only ones where that applies.
hailmaryrecordings said:
Personally and i think many used before dolphin anty as have free profile and fit most the use i need. I see you didn't include this in your list op but i believe is worth a shot for newbie that don't have or don't want to spend money at beginning is great and simple to use and efficient with mobile or residential proxies
Click to expand...
Dolphin anty is one that I never got around to test properly as their interface didn't let me scroll down to the options, so I just called it a day. I see it has a very active community with not too many complaints , so I can't say anything bad, but neither anything good.

I cannperhaps further say that I have tested gologin a little bit extensively and since they're cloud browser kind of product, which is unthankful and hard, even if what they have is okay in relation to the hardness, it's still terrible.


Bottom barell is dedicated to "insomniac", lol, brave with a proxy hooked into that is probably better at anti detect than that.
 
theusualkeysersoze said:
It depends, if we consider the API and automations, ML is better, if we consider core release velocity, ML is better but speed is not always good, this time they all got bit by a total environment leak on iphey.
If we consider the default setting, something unthankfull, they all try to habe reasonable default settings and people think it's plug and play for all, it cannot be if they set masked values to screen resolution and it generates something totally insane, far from your real one, a pixelation mismatch is guaranteed to occur, is hardware concuurency is set higher than what you have available, it can never be a good thing, and ultimately, LS has one extremyl irresponsible setting which multilogin does not even present you with and the default is set to guarantee ip leaks depending on which kinda is used

their warm up cookie bots both equally suck soni have made my own.i mean theyre okay, fpr some things, for orhers not.

overall, between these 2 , it is hard to say which is better, arguably, multilogin is better at creating discrete canvas noise, ls will have a bit more fallout.

ML was subject to ddos attacks lately(badge of honor) with some corresponding downtimes but they have proven to be resilient, ans for what it's worth, they never suffered a hack or data breach, the only ones where that applies.

Dolphin anty is one that I never got around to test properly as their interface didn't let me scroll down to the options, so I just called it a day. I see it has a very active community with not too many complaints , so I can't say anything bad, but neither anything good.

I cannperhaps further say that I have tested gologin a little bit extensively and since they're cloud browser kind of product, which is unthankful and hard, even if what they have is okay in relation to the hardness, it's still terrible.


Bottom barell is dedicated to "insomniac", lol, brave with a proxy hooked into that is probably better at anti detect than that.
Click to expand...
Any chance you can elaborate on the leaks that ML is prone to? For me that's the most important thing compared to automation or API usage. You can still manually change the masked settings yourself no?

Also, what are your thoughts on the Config Pool feature from LInkensphere? Is it just hype or does it actually work to generate believable profiles?

@Multilogin antidetect

Maybe you can chime in to the discussion? Would love to hear your expert thoughts on how your program compares and address some of these concerns?
 
Last edited:
Almost all cloakers have the same features. Success of using a cloaker is only 5% the cloaker and 95% is outside of the cloaker, in other words 95% is in an ad campaign's usage of keywords, an ad campaign's usage of of ad headlines / ad descriptions and also the white landing page.
 
gabrielspecter said:
Any chance you can elaborate on the leaks that ML is prone to? For me that's the most important thing compared to automation or API usage. You can still manually change the masked settings yourself no?

Also, what are your thoughts on the Config Pool feature from LInkensphere? Is it just hype or does it actually work to generate believable profiles?

@Multilogin antidetect

Maybe you can chime in to the discussion? Would love to hear your expert thoughts on how your program compares and address some of these concerns?
Click to expand...
ML is not prone any more or less than others to system level leaks, it's something that I have discovered, told them about and I have found a hacky way around it, they're the only ones to actually listen to these things and reward you a bit for it and do something about it, unlike all the others, so multilogin is the best I Ln that regard, the others aren't even aware and the ignorance and arrogance when I, the guy who found the leak and the fix, tell them is something else, I imagine then how they would treat an end user and that's it, would never ever buy.

LS new tool where the say that new feature is adding minimal noise blabla is total and utter bullshit. Linkensphere I have to be explicit, if you rock their boat a bit too much, outside their comfort zone they get very defensive and rude when no other options are available. I have discussions in their tg group, you go and be the judge.LS is good and I mean this explicitly, only if you know exactly and precisely every setting and understand what they do, if you need support, you are screwed.

I will say again and again, since there's apparently people who work there in this very thread, the company is scum, they have a bounty program out there, "prove our human typing bot is detectable" . Bounty 270 usd in sub fees.
Took me 10 minutes until I discovered a way hownit collapses the whole browser instance, every single time, they argued a browser instance shutting down in undetectable....imagine that.

And I cited datadome , which is also hard to find , you know they do not disclose how they detect what, as it would be against their economic interest, so I go and meet them , pretending I am an interested customer and I provided ls with an article where they said they check if people do typos and then how frequently and at what speed cadence the corrections occur.

When presented to linkenshpere , sincebtheir bot doesn't do typos, unlike every human out there, let alone random speed typos etc, they said "you know, some people type without typos" sure, right, and thousands of users use ls and none of them make a type.

This one post took me 20 minutes to type, so let me be very clear and explicit, ls is run by scumbags and people who will move goal posts after ypubdiscover bugs they're too stupid to find. Fuck them.

Their product is okay if you know as much as I do, it and dev education and still many months of trial and error, aka new person , layman person has no chance in he'll to do anything good with that.

Judge a team when they're walking on thin ice, based on that behavior. Judge them based on how they deal with promises. What's infuriating is it takes me now 30 minutes to compose this post on mobile and most people do not read.

Or forget. It's a scumbag company, go back 1,2,e months in their tg group, find my posts. Read how much they know and some of their dumbass statements, also, their default settings are extremly extremly dumb and highly irresponsible, let me be very clear, you're guaranteed to leak your real ip every single time.

LS is like a Ferrari but but thrown at your feet disassembled into 10000 pieces and you need to assemble it and run it, questions are not permitted, you need to know how to do it. Since their fkn support can't answer questions either.

ML is the honorable one here, trust me.

@SirPrompt no that's not how this works, this is not a beauty pageant.

AlwaysAtWork said:
Almost all cloakers have the same features. Success of using a cloaker is only 5% the cloaker and 95% is outside of the cloaker, in other words 95% is in an ad campaign's usage of keywords, an ad campaign's usage of of ad headlines / ad descriptions and also the white landing page.
Click to expand...
Bro I think your botnis hallucinating Gtfo of my organic thread.
 
theusualkeysersoze said:
ML is not prone any more or less than others to system level leaks, it's something that I have discovered, told them about and I have found a hacky way around it, they're the only ones to actually listen to these things and reward you a bit for it and do something about it, unlike all the others, so multilogin is the best I Ln that regard, the others aren't even aware and the ignorance and arrogance when I, the guy who found the leak and the fix, tell them is something else, I imagine then how they would treat an end user and that's it, would never ever buy.

LS new tool where the say that new feature is adding minimal noise blabla is total and utter bullshit. Linkensphere I have to be explicit, if you rock their boat a bit too much, outside their comfort zone they get very defensive and rude when no other options are available. I have discussions in their tg group, you go and be the judge.LS is good and I mean this explicitly, only if you know exactly and precisely every setting and understand what they do, if you need support, you are screwed.

I will say again and again, since there's apparently people who work there in this very thread, the company is scum, they have a bounty program out there, "prove our human typing bot is detectable" . Bounty 270 usd in sub fees.
Took me 10 minutes until I discovered a way hownit collapses the whole browser instance, every single time, they argued a browser instance shutting down in undetectable....imagine that.

And I cited datadome , which is also hard to find , you know they do not disclose how they detect what, as it would be against their economic interest, so I go and meet them , pretending I am an interested customer and I provided ls with an article where they said they check if people do typos and then how frequently and at what speed cadence the corrections occur.

When presented to linkenshpere , sincebtheir bot doesn't do typos, unlike every human out there, let alone random speed typos etc, they said "you know, some people type without typos" sure, right, and thousands of users use ls and none of them make a type.

This one post took me 20 minutes to type, so let me be very clear and explicit, ls is run by scumbags and people who will move goal posts after ypubdiscover bugs they're too stupid to find. Fuck them.

Their product is okay if you know as much as I do, it and dev education and still many months of trial and error, aka new person , layman person has no chance in he'll to do anything good with that.

Judge a team when they're walking on thin ice, based on that behavior. Judge them based on how they deal with promises. What's infuriating is it takes me now 30 minutes to compose this post on mobile and most people do not read.

Or forget. It's a scumbag company, go back 1,2,e months in their tg group, find my posts. Read how much they know and some of their dumbass statements, also, their default settings are extremly extremly dumb and highly irresponsible, let me be very clear, you're guaranteed to leak your real ip every single time.

LS is like a Ferrari but but thrown at your feet disassembled into 10000 pieces and you need to assemble it and run it, questions are not permitted, you need to know how to do it. Since their fkn support can't answer questions either.

ML is the honorable one here, trust me.

@SirPrompt no that's not how this works, this is not a beauty pageant.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the write up, but honestly, I'm confused as to where you stand. Half of this seems like you got handled badly by their support team and are venting your frustrations, which I guess in itself is a valid concern to have.

But I was asking specifically about what you wrote in your initial post about MultiLogin here:

theusualkeysersoze said:
The bad and the ugly parts:

The default settings are terrible and you are risking to be exposed badly. Navigator settings is making up total BS values if set to masked.

Live support is either forced to give dishonest advise or badly schooled, or worst case, maybe both. For the easy questions, they are very good.

Firefox fork get detected by Google before you can count to 2.

The proxy configs do not consistently maintain state.

No warm up feature, they have import cookies but you do not want to import cookies on a profile with no history and where you dont know wth they put into these cookies, the target websites know exactly what they put into their cookies.
Click to expand...

You seem to contradict yourself multiple times here. Your initial post says 1.) Their settings are terrible and you risk exposure badly. 2.) Their support is very bad.
Then your latest reply says the complete opposite of both those points.
 
gabrielspecter said:
Thanks for the write up, but honestly, I'm confused as to where you stand. Half of this seems like you got handled badly by their support team and are venting your frustrations, which I guess in itself is a valid concern to have.

But I was asking specifically about what you wrote in your initial post about MultiLogin here:



You seem to contradict yourself multiple times here. Your initial post says 1.) Their settings are terrible and you risk exposure badly. 2.) Their support is very bad.
Then your latest reply says the complete opposite of both those points.
Click to expand...
That's new exposure, I didn't go edit the original post.

From a tech perspective, LS is okay.

Bit what their support is claiming at times is total bs, I cannot recommend them to anyone who doesn't know the inside outs of anti detect browsers and proxies.

Something at the management and support layer is going awry all the time, either maliciousness or incompetence, or both.

I stand firmly with ML on this one.
 
theusualkeysersoze said:
That's new exposure, I didn't go edit the original post.

From a tech perspective, LS is okay.

Bit what their support is claiming at times is total bs, I cannot recommend them to anyone who doesn't know the inside outs of anti detect browsers and proxies.

Something at the management and support layer is going awry all the time, either maliciousness or incompetence, or both.

I stand firmly with ML on this one.
Click to expand...

I see, thanks for the clarification.

Seems like support is much better on ML but how about ML from a tech perspective? Is their masked features now still as bad as you describe in the initial post or is it much better now?
 
gabrielspecter said:
I see, thanks for the clarification.

Seems like support is much better on ML but how about ML from a tech perspective? Is their masked features now still as bad as you describe in the initial post or is it much better now?
Click to expand...
Ah no, that was a misunderstanding I believe, whenever they faced leaks and exposures, it was all the providers, default settings are bad on all providers, nobody can reasonably expect to run large operations with default settings, on none of the providers, ML actually has reasonably good ones, it depends which machine or hosting is used, really.

They have the smartest noise generation mathods if you ask me, this is relatively easy tested on a couple open source websites, I hope that clarifies things.
 
theusualkeysersoze said:

Before going ahead, some words of clarification.​

I am not affiliated with any anti detect provider and I sue them as tools, the field is dynamic and none of them is the best in every category or feature, it is important to understand how they work, why they work(or do not work). It is always a cat and mouse game vs mainly Google and "anti fraud" providers like SEON et all. One broswer might be the best at soemthing tomorrow and then collapse your whole infrastructure tomorrow. What you want is knowing how the config fields work and how to encapsulate bowser instances("profiles") from eachother. Some of them are consistently bad and the satin gloves are off, no prisoners will be taken, I have seen too many "recommendations" with no explanations for terrible products and terribly bad advise. Many people struggle to understand the concept of proxies and they play an important role in all this. Do not worry, this is a complicated field which requires IT expertise and/or the will to learn and constantly adapt. I will leave out the VM kernel level anti detects, they are far superior to any of the ones that will be mentioned here and they come with cons like exorbitant pricing and infrastructure requirements and they are definitely not for users who are not very very advanced and knowledgeable in IT and development. They rather dereve a separate thread.

Therefore, with no further ado, lets roll.

What Is an Anti-Detect Browser?​


An anti-detect browser is a specialized browser environment that allows users to create multiple isolated profiles("instances", each with its own unique digital fingerprint. This includes attributes like screen resolution, timezone, fonts, WebGL/Canvas/TLS characteristics, cookies, and more. By using these browsers, individuals can manage multiple online accounts without them being linked together, which is particularly useful for activities such as web scraping, automation, and privacy focused browsing aka multiaccounting, for example.

It is very important to understand that all these things, with the exception of VM generation, happen on network layer 7 aka application layer, aka Javascript, there are more things happening on web requests, but the anti detect browser manipulations are all happening on L7. You can, with a bit of NodeJS knowledge, fake almost every attribute.

Before going further, here is a good spot to mention the roles of proxies:

In simple terms, many commercial residential or mobile proxies are essentially real laptops or Android devices with a hotspot turned on, where the owner's internet connection is shared in a controlled way so other people can route traffic through it. It's akin to borrowing someone else's connection for a short time to make requests appear to come from their device.

This brings us to....Why Use an Anti-Detect Browser?

  • Multi-Account Management: Operate multiple accounts on platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Amazon, or Google without risking bans or account linking. In real world terms, post many Trustpilot reviews from the same machine, for example.
  • Web Scraping & Automation: data extraction tasks while mimicking real user behavior to avoid detection.
  • Privacy & Anonymity: Mask your true digital fingerprint to enhance online privacy and prevent tracking. They do so in an elegant way, not by disabling everything raw like TOR, which is detectable everytime and you will be swimming in captchas.
  • Ad Verification & Testing: Simulate different user environments to verify ad placements and test website functionalities, this is testimony that these tools can be used for good.

How to Choose the Right Anti-Detect Browser​


You consider the following factors:
  • Use Case: Determine whether you need the browser for multi-account management, web scraping, automation, or privacy.
  • Fingerprint Control: Evaluate how well the browser can mask or randomize your digital fingerprint. Does it do something extremely random that just looks dumb in the https requests and headers?
  • Proxy Integration: Check if the browser supports proxy integration and the types of proxies supported (e.g., residential, mobile etc) and do they honor sticky times and where does the rotation take you on the next session? Do they clean their pools?
  • Automation Support: If automation is a priority, ensure the browser supports automation tools like Puppeteer or Playwright.
  • Mobile Emulation: For mobile based tasks, consider browsers with mobile emulation capabilities.
  • Team Collaboration: If working in a team, look for browsers that offer team collaboration features.

At this point, I would like to say very clearly that I would NEVER use the integrated proxies because the anti detect providers do not clean the pools and the proxies are used daily by less sophisticated users and 99% of the time, to do funny things. Assume the worst, if you use them use an exit IP checking tool before you do so, it will save you a lot of headaches and time.

The next point, all the mobile emulators ran from a windows or MAC OS are basically suicidal, unless the target website has no protections at all. Do you wanna know how easy it is to detect this? They can try to trigger open web dev console and youre done, or they can just check if the JS touchevent is available, if not, you are done. A laptop with touch screen functionality can be useful for this, and surprisinlgy, only 2 website I have come accross try to open dev tools, and even that, they do by accident because they want to hide someone checking their netwrok requests(one of them being bet365).

Now, in no particular order:

Multilogin

The good parts:
Fingerprint control: Fine grained, all the relevant settings are available

Automation support: API avaialble, very solid and nice

Team collab: Yes

Support: Human live support, I will leave this one as "good part" but with objections and reservations.

Stealthfox aka FF fork available.

The bad and the ugly parts:

The default settings are terrible and you are risking to be exposed badly. Navigator settings is making up total BS values if set to masked.

Live support is either forced to give dishonest advise or badly schooled, or worst case, maybe both. For the easy questions, they are very good.

Firefox fork get detected by Google before you can count to 2.

The proxy configs do not consistently maintain state.

No warm up feature, they have import cookies but you do not want to import cookies on a profile with no history and where you dont know wth they put into these cookies, the target websites know exactly what they put into their cookies.

Insomniac:

Fingerprint control: Zero

Automation support: Nope

Team collab: Nope and you do not want it.

Insomniac is on this list because it is the worst POS I have ever had the displeasure of dealing with. It emulates Edge browser 4 versions back with no way to set anything, it is a black box with generates fingerprints that do not pass Pixelscan, but it actually, somehow let me create gmails anyway, at least the few times I have played around with it. Documentation is horrendous, support does not exist at all. Think of the most dumb thing you could do with money for a second...got it? Okay now do that thing, its still better than buying a subscription for this anti detect.

LinkenSphere2:

As of typing this, this is the current king of the road. The best warm up feature with real cookies and history generated, the best because...They are the only ones to do so.
Various Browsers available, extremly important, remember Chrome is hostile grounds ran by a company with nothing but bad intentions and snooping on you on mind to make a buck. Btw, do not trsut FF or its forks either, there are people out there who believe a naked firefox comes close to an antidetect, which is a riduclous notion only a fanboi/girl could come up with, FF has 100-500 times less engineers than Chrome , MS has given up ambitions on own browser and they just use a Chromium fork now instead, that should tell you all you need to know about FF.
LS2 offers very granular control over the settings, which should be used with great care, if you do not know how the settings play together, leave something like default or close to your real machine.

The negatives are, I have no idea where to find their support team, so I cannot say if you are on your own if something goes wrong. Gmail account creation works here to a degree and under some circumstances, btw.

The remaining anti detects are kind of equally good or bad, I will mention the most important things.

Incognition, MoreLogin and Gologin all have only moderate levels of fingerprint control, which is bad, I believe it should be high, if you mess up, it is on you and you go back to the drawing board, but to trust any provider with FP creation automatically disqualifies the product to me.

Octobrowser, Kameleo and Adspower all have granular control over FP but support is damned slow, which also automatically disqualifies the provider for me, they will not be there to even tell you whats happening if something happens.

Every single other provider not mentioned here will mostly be because they have a very bad AI bot for support, which I consider them peepeeing on my head and telling me its raining. Anti D subs cost loads of money and are supposed to provide anonymity and privacy for your infrastructure and if you pay them, you deserve better than a poorly configured AI bot taking your questions. This is not something like a Lebara prepaid card topup matter, this is something peoples livelihood might depend on.

I hope this was a good and enjoyable read, do not be a stranger and engage if I have not mentioned something or you agree, or disagree.

Precise settings I will not give away here, firstly because it might be interpeted as a guide to web abuse and because the setting depends on various factors, there is not really a one size fits all, it comes down to what is the task, whats the goal, whats the proxy and well, which anti detect.
Click to expand...
Opinion on Dolphin Anty?
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top