Amonetize Suggestion

Do you agree with this Change?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I don't give a shit

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

SuperAffiliate

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
381
Reaction score
429
I wanted to ask you guys if you agree with me that the Installer of amonetize is converting very less because of the "for free" added at the end of the Installer name.
It makes people automatically think that its a scam
I did a split test and it seems that for 30 clicks i get 2 installs for amonetize but for installerex, for every 20 clicks i get 2 installs which means Installerex is more converting even though their installer is a bit crappy and shows clearly its a downloader instead. Seriously its written in big "EzDownloader is a blabla which includes advertising blabla"
If amonetize could only remove that last 2 words and also fix the installer file name when downloading instead of "FileName_1249204i94823" some shit like that.

Here is a screenshot of what I am talking about:

S8gfjNL


I also did a virustotal check for revenyou, installerex and amonetize installers. The best less detected one was indeed amonetize's installer which was 5/56

[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD]SHA256:[/TD]
[TD]082ca219fe4ad235d50a58ab5ed078b48ad39634ba4e57ad4a0f9d62d69bc6ca[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]File name:[/TD]
[TD]Minecraft Premium Account Generator__11872_il728611.exe[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Detection ratio:[/TD]
[TD="class: text-red"]5 / 57[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Analysis date:[/TD]
[TD]2015-04-08 10:13:56 UTC ( 1 minute ago )[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

For the others it was either 11/56 or 23/56
If amonetize would consider these small changes, it would be the best ppi to use
PS: The "download & Install" also should be changed in just "Setup" or "Installer" at the end like "FileName Setup" or "FileName Installer"
 
That is great idea, have you alreafy concacted your manager about this?

He hasn't replied to me in skype for around 21 days

fuckthat.jpg
 
that installer interface from the picture is from amonetize ? i ask this because mine is different.
 
that installer interface from the picture is from amonetize ? i ask this because mine is different.

yeah its from amonetize
really? Can you screenshot yours please, i want to check it
 
Its doesnt matter the main reason is antivirus. lots of them block these files.
 
Its doesnt matter the main reason is antivirus. lots of them block these files.

yeah but for amonetize, its only detected by 5 antiviruses compared to other PPI networks' installers
It does matter a lot
Installerex's Installer is detected by 11 AVs and Amonetize 5 AVs only
However when i did the split test, the result was different and installerex yielded more installs compared to amonetize.
 
You submitted it in virustotal? It will be detected by more AV's in the future.
 
You submitted it in virustotal? It will be detected by more AV's in the future.
not really, they update the installer every time, i did a virus total a week ago on amonetize and revenyou got 11/56 and 23/56 now it became 5/56 and 21/56
And also when i tried to scan, there were some installers already there in VT, they redirected me there
 
As far I understood, they use these filenames for tracking the affiliates. Would be a huge change for them to make I am afraid. The removal of the word free is indeed a wise one. I have seen some installers including there 'shields' (100% clean download) in the first page. I guess that would be a way better fit.

The high amount of anti-virus listings is caused by the fact that these networks use one installer for each of there affiliates as the source. Even if they keep changing it every hour that won't prevent such listings. If your volume is steady and high, ask for a custom build, you will see it skyrocket your profits :)
 
yesterday, a represantator of Amonetize has contacted me, he runs the pub team. He told me he did the amendments that i suggested :D and i was using truemediapartner, it seems my installs convertion doubled.
 
I thought we could rename amonetize installer as we see fit and host on local servers?! As long as the versions match (latest) shouldnt it be tracked ?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top