Am I doing SEO for my new site correctly?

I have a new site I am trying to rank, I recently bought a SEO backlinking service from a very trusted service and I believe he will rank my site well(he has even said for my keyword 1-2 months can probably get it 1-2# spot), but I must do other things to help it rank as it is a 3 week brand new domain. So far I have bought some Tier 1 contextual links and now I plan on making high quality web 2.0 articles, and also drip feeding social signals to my site. Is this a good strategy? and what can I do to improve it?

My Main SEO: Red Square SEO Pro Package: I cant link it but its here on blackhatforums and I posted a comment on it View attachment 63760 (click on picture to expand)

What I just bought: View attachment 63758 (click on picture to expand)

What I plan on buying tommorow: View attachment 63759 (click on picture to expand)

and also social signals will be drip fed through out the month around 500-1000 total. Please give me any and all opinions you have and whether it is a bad idea to have all this happening at the same time and so soon, should I wait and what should I do first? I don't think they are interfering with each other in a bad way as my main SEO owner told me it is a good idea to have these also along with his service.

Many people think you cant do seo for new sites. That is not the case. When you build (or buy) links for new website, make sure you keep on building links at same pace. So you wont have any problem. If you buy 1 or 2 service this week, and next week you get 0 backlinks for your sites, you will definitely have some problems.

NapsteR said:

Many people think you cant do seo for new sites. That is not the case. When you build (or buy) links for new website, make sure you keep on building links at same pace. So you wont have any problem. If you buy 1 or 2 service this week, and next week you get 0 backlinks for your sites, you will definitely have some problems.

Click to expand...

Yes I have heard this thats why my first service is my monthly plan, and it is very high quality backlinks. My main question is what I can do to support that and make the links stronger, 2.0s, wikis and such.

There's no way to give an accurate answer without more details.

1-2 months for a brand new site is way too short to rank for anything even moderately competitive these days, it would have to be really, really low competition.

What are the metrics for the top 10 results? Average DA/PA? Keywords in titles? What can you tell us about the keyword you're targeting?

around 50,000 searches a month but low competition

you can rank a site in 2 months

eponus said:

There's no way to give an accurate answer without more details.

1-2 months for a brand new site is way too short to rank for anything even moderately competitive these days, it would have to be really, really low competition.

What are the metrics for the top 10 results? Average DA/PA? Keywords in titles? What can you tell us about the keyword you're targeting?

Click to expand...

Okay guys now I am buying web 2.0s and sending blog postings and tier 2-3 backlinks to those web 2.0s

am I going to fast? please let me know guys

bump pleaes help me guys

Have you started ranking anywhere on google for your main keywords yet?

uktelecoms said:

Have you started ranking anywhere on google for your main keywords yet?

Click to expand...

Its been about a week and I have not started ranking, the high quality backlinks are not near completion as they are 160 links and he drip feeds them through out a month. What I am mostly looking for is what I should do to help these backlinks. So far I plan on getting drip fed social signals and web 2.0s that are supported by tier 2 and 3 links.

Hi,

I'm a bit sceptical about the SEO service you are getting. I don't know how it's possible to offer 160 links from pages with 100% unique relevant content with guaranteed PR of 1 to 6 per link. In fact, I know it's not possible.

1. I would suggest the content is not unique and probably spun.
2. There is zero PR. The root domain of the the web 2.0 site holding the content might have PR, but it's impossible for new content on a web 2.0 to automatically get PR. Page rank takes time and lots of traffic. Low quality content will never generate PR and therefore, ranking.
3. Social signals serve only one purpose. They generate traffic but ONLY if they are shared within specific communities. Google does not use them as a quality signal.
4. To me it sounds like the links in general are low quality, automated and pretty worthless.

You might get some joy for keywords with little or no competition, but for a new site competing with domains that have existing relevant backlinks, I don't see it working with that kind of SEO.

Well I will let you know how it goes, so far they have no bad views out of many. But we will see with time.

Great way to graphic good and bad SEO. I'd like to add some other social networks that matters, like Google+ or Youtube (the second search engine most used in the world). The new SEO is so based on the user experience so the site must be responsive and good looking to!

I actually got Social Signals that drip through out the month, 150 G+ Shares, 500 FB Shares, 800 Retweets, and other stuff slowly every day. Social signals are really important now a day.