For example, for content creation, AI relies on what ? It relies on the vast database of content that is created by human beings. In a way AI may affect certain professions in certain ways. But to effectively use AI, a creative human brain is required. For example, let us assume that I can now use AI to code, so if I can, then all of us can. So, we all can suddenly scale up. But, how can we all then earn from it ? We need to market what (using AI) we code, (in order to earn from what we code using AI). So, example, coders using AI to code is getting saturated. As a human being, I would not make certain of my buying decisions based purely on some automated marketing material that is given to me.
How will all these coders earn from all the coding ? Using AI to market what they code ? I will always prefer some real human interaction, not AI interaction, when making a buying decision, in many cases. Therefore, human activity & human creativity, still matters even if using AI.
AI will be intelligent for me, the day, I can tell AI "Hey, AI, I will just sit and relax by the beach, you please make me passive income forever, without me moving a finger". In my individual case, till that is not possible, then AI is not all that intelligent. Why ? For any effective usage of AI, human creative activity will always be needed. You can make a million codes by coding with AI, but to make effective usage (earnings) from it, your human creativity is needed and will always be needed for it.
AI has and will continue to replace some human tasks, but my point is that the application of such AI done tasks, will always require human creativity.
