AI is a propoganda-mill and a LIAR!

Why you not using it for productive means and wasting your time with this? Either you're rich to care about an ai opinion on these matters of politics, or your running for congress. Or your an Internet marketer that isn't woking hard enough yet ;) Get building some more sites or apps with it. Forget having a flame war with an ai. It's just looking in the mirror. Good luck.
 
Why you not using it for productive means and wasting your time with this? Either you're rich to care about an ai opinion on these matters of politics, or your running for congress. Or your an Internet marketer that isn't woking hard enough yet ;) Get building some more sites or apps with it. Forget having a flame war with an ai. It's just looking in the mirror. Good luck.
Look at the guy's username.

He's just one of those weird red pill incels--they're not known for their good judgment.

Just let him play with himself, he'll get bored and go away...
 
That's a bit harsh on baby AI.
It's only trying to help you with what data humans have taught and trained it.

That's why the training data and input prompt is so important.
 
For serious research follow Wikipedia, not chatgpt.
My take:
  • Fun research which you cannot trust: ChatGPT
  • Mild research which you maybe probably can trust: Wikipedia
  • Serious research: Scholar on Google
I'm a Wikipedia editor. Usually you can trust us, but no always. There are editors who niftily dance around the editing rules to push specific agenda. There's a reason whole pool of U.S. Congress IPs got banned from editing Wikipedia.
 
I wouldn't call it a propaganda mill.
But it does produce incorrect and inaccurate responses in many topics.

Yes, but will ALL data be included in AI? Or only the data they allow? In which case it would definitely be a propaganda mill tbh.

Why you not using it for productive means and wasting your time with this? Either you're rich to care about an ai opinion on these matters of politics, or your running for congress. Or your an Internet marketer that isn't woking hard enough yet ;) Get building some more sites or apps with it. Forget having a flame war with an ai. It's just looking in the mirror. Good luck.

I had a short break in-between meetings haha. I'm also using it to make great prompts so yeah.

Chatgpt can make a good attorney it knows how to lie from its politically bias coders. :)

Prosecutor: *brings up evidence*
ChatGPT: "yeah, but that's not evidence... because let me explain," :D

Look at the guy's username.

He's just one of those weird red pill incels--they're not known for their good judgment.

Just let him play with himself, he'll get bored and go away...

Sorry sir, I don't subscribe to any political agendas :) I do not know of this red pill you speak of.

Do not rely on that information.


Smh... ChatGPT can't either lol!

For serious research follow Wikipedia, not chatgpt.

That's the same thing almost :alien:

That's a bit harsh on baby AI.
It's only trying to help you with what data humans have taught and trained it.

That's why the training data and input prompt is so important.

Very true. I love to train it and feed it well-versed prompts.

My take:
  • Fun research which you cannot trust: ChatGPT
  • Mild research which you maybe probably can trust: Wikipedia
  • Serious research: Scholar on Google
I'm a Wikipedia editor. Usually you can trust us, but no always. There are editors who niftily dance around the editing rules to push specific agenda. There's a reason whole pool of U.S. Congress IPs got banned from editing Wikipedia.


Very true I agree. Most information found on Wikipedia is pretty solid but every now and then, they'll be a bad page. What made you want to be a Wiki editor? What are some of the best ways of researching content not found on Google?
 
Back
Top