AI for content writing

You get better output for broader niches
Definitely worth a shot if you hire writers

Many people seem to think that the sensit.ai is the best version.

Also, it seems like editting to make a good article is required.

mix results and cheap.

I am using Sensit.ai. Everything is ok

MisterF said:

This is the thing, most people think you put a keyword, push a button and 2 minutes later you have a 3k word perfect article.

Click to expand...

Hmm well I would love to make a full automated SEO process via coding to spit out articles on long tails and just scale her up. Kw generation bot then post to one of these tools. Is it possible to succeed like this? I know some articles would be rubbish probably but if you are going the scale method I guess some would be passable and rank then with ads (affiliate rather than adsense bullshit hoops) then you should get some click throughs even if the ROI and conversions would be less vs high quality stuff right?

So make up for it in scale what you lose on quality? Is it a viable option? Basically I love coding and automation and dislike article writing, at least doing it all the time, so would love to make an a-z automated seo shop. I did this with porn upload and got myself a full time passive income from it (for now). Would love to be able to repeat the process for seo or is it asking too much given the quality that would be required for readable text to be passable and get you anywhere (with no human intervention and editing of articles)?

I've been using Jasper.ai for the past couple of months and I'd say it's a good sort of partner to have. Once I provide my outline and give it basic instructions on what I want each individual section to be about, it usually does a pretty good job creating some basic content. Sometimes I'll get really lucky and it just goes on and on with some surprisingly good content, but I usually have to intervene and redirect it or it kind of stops and hangs on a particular idea or topic. Sometimes it repeats itself.

The other day I watched it crank out over 3,000 words with virtually no input and it was all objectively accurate, shareable content. However, that is a rare occurrence and hasn't happened against since. In my experience, if you give it the same amount of direction, it can generate more readable content than a lot of cheap Fiverr writers. It sounds a lot more human-like than a lot of them, but then it comes down to what you're willing to settle for in terms of quality.

If you're looking at it as an assistant for a human writer, I think it's worth it. If you're looking for it as a replacement to a human writer, you're going to spend too much time tweaking and editing things. I haven't tried the other tools, but I heard Sensit is very similar and maybe better.