AI created SEO contents to the better optimized content?

G

godang

Supreme Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2009
Messages
1,225
Reaction score
277
Hi,

I'm creating a lot of SEO content with either Perplexity or Claudi AI.
However, they've all detected more than 80% AI content.

Is it okay to use Quillbot for AI Detector, then Paraphraser, and lastly AI Humanizer, so that the content will be more humanized and rank better?

Or, are there any other options that you can recommend?

Thank you...
 
Advertise on BHW
Yes, AI can create well-optimized SEO content when guided with the right keywords, structure, and intent.
 
Grandabdullah said:
Yes, AI can create well-optimized SEO content when guided with the right keywords, structure, and intent.
Click to expand...
However, they're all detected as AI-generated content, and isn't that bad for Google's ranking?
 
AI detection doesn’t matter for SEO. Google cares about usefulness, not AI %. Stacking paraphrasers usually hurts quality. Best approach is AI draft and light human edits and real value.
 
Most of the AI detectors are not good enough. You need to give human input for making humanize content. Another AI wont make humanize content.
 
In my view, adding your own ideas and experience works better than using tools just to change AI scores.
 
using tools to “humanize” AI content can help it pass detectors, but it doesn’t automatically make it better for seo. google cares more about value, readability, and relevance than whether it’s AI or human written. Instead of heavy paraphrasing, focus on adding original insights, examples, and depth that AI can’t generate on its own. that way, your content is naturally more human, useful, and likely to rank well.
 
Don’t chase AI scores. They don’t affect rankings. Stacking paraphrasers often kills readability. Use AI for speed, then rewrite key parts yourself so the content actually answers the search intent.
 
godang said:
However, they're all detected as AI-generated content, and isn't that bad for Google's ranking?
Click to expand...
If you give the right prompt using ai. You will get 0% ai, you don't have to rephrase it using quillbot and ai humanizers. Just generate content with right prompt. Go through the article and if you found everything is fine in the article. You can just post is directly. Sometimes the content will be irrelevant even thought the prompt are well optimised. So you have to check it for every article
 
obsessing over ai scores is a trap lol . google doesn't care if ur text is 99% ai as long as the entities are mapped correctly .

instead of stacking re-phrasers (which kill readability) , focus on entity injection .

  1. take your raw ai text .
  2. check top-3 competitors for named entities (brands , locations , specific terms) using nlp tools .
  3. force claud/gpt to inject those specific entities into your content .
  4. wrap the key parts in Schema.org markup (FAQ , HowTo , Table) .
a "humanized" text with zero semantic depth ranks worse than raw gpt-4 output that actually covers the topic graph . i have auto-blogs with 100% ai content ranking fine because the schema structure is solid .
 
AI % doesn’t matter for rankings. Google doesn’t use detectors. Chaining paraphrasers usually hurts quality. Best move is use AI for drafts, then manually edit for intent, clarity, and real value.
 
Use AI for drafts, add real human stuff (examples, screenshots, numbers, your opinion) and then clean it up (simplify sentences, avoid LLM fingerprints, etc.)
 
I rank content with AI on a daily basis, it does not matter if content is AI or not. Content Quality matters, Chunking matters, Readability score matters, User retention and good Titles matter.
 
Paraphrasing tools won’t fool Google long term real edits, unique insights, and value matter more than “humanizer” tricks.
 
Yes, you can use paraphrasing and humanizing tools, but AI detector scores don’t affect rankings, what actually helps is adding original insights, real examples, expert signals, and strong UX, not chasing humanized scores.
 
Using tools like Quillbot or AI humanizers can help reduce AI-detectable patterns, but the real key is adding your own insights, examples, and structure. Even heavily “humanized” AI content performs better when it includes original value that AI alone can’t replicate.
 
I completely agree with the previous comments that manually editing and adding original insights is key to creating high-quality content. Using tools like Quillbot or AI humanizers can be helpful in reducing AI-detectable patterns, but it's not a substitute for human touch. I'd like to ask, godang, have you considered combining AI-generated content with manual editing and adding unique perspectives to create a hybrid approach? This way, you can leverage the efficiency of AI tools while still injecting humanized elements into your content. What's your current workflow like, and how do you plan to balance AI-generated content with manual editing?
 
Thank you, everyone, for the very valuable comments.
The reason I'm asking is that English is my 2nd language and it's very hard for me edit the contents on my own words.
Any content that pulls out from AI, it looks and sounds perfect to me, and I don't know what to edit.

Let me ask you one more question.
Which platform is better to create SEO content?
ChatGPT, Claude AI, Perplexity, or any other tools you can recommend?
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top