AI CONTENT WRITING IS JUST A BUBBLE

I've been using AI, chat GPT and others to write articles for 2 years now, and I can say this is not going to fly as expected or claimed.

Last year, I generated 500+ articles using different prompts, and was later adding human touches to improve their quality and use for Parasites and Guest posts.

With my experience with these contents, mostly generated by Chat GPT, it's just a bubble that's about to burst.

The buzz of AI writers is almost gone.
You can say the strength lies on prompt engineering, AI will get better in the future, more AI writing machine will be developed just like people claim DeepSeek is better than ChatGPT today bla bla bla bla.

AI contents lack Credibility and Reliability, 2 important factors in Data analysis.

Of what use is data that's not reliable?

If writers would have to understand the topic, and be able to proofread and remove non-factual sentences before using a generated article on a blog with real audience, then, such contents are useless.

I think more people will not border to use AI writers for serious projects in the future unless you're offering services.
Still there are many who claim to be be expert in using AI for sites which they had made profitable .
 
AI tools like chatgpt has its uses, but it's not the be-all and end-all many AI fanboys think it is.
There's a reason so many brands and businesses, in their project requirements, demand that potential candidate writers "do not rely on AI tools".
 
I've been using AI, chat GPT and others to write articles for 2 years now, and I can say this is not going to fly as expected or claimed.

Last year, I generated 500+ articles using different prompts, and was later adding human touches to improve their quality and use for Parasites and Guest posts.

With my experience with these contents, mostly generated by Chat GPT, it's just a bubble that's about to burst.

The buzz of AI writers is almost gone.
You can say the strength lies on prompt engineering, AI will get better in the future, more AI writing machine will be developed just like people claim DeepSeek is better than ChatGPT today bla bla bla bla.

AI contents lack Credibility and Reliability, 2 important factors in Data analysis.

Of what use is data that's not reliable?

If writers would have to understand the topic, and be able to proofread and remove non-factual sentences before using a generated article on a blog with real audience, then, such contents are useless.

I think more people will not border to use AI writers for serious projects in the future unless you're offering services.


Use of AI

Generative AI is a tool which is utilised by people as the 'be all - end all'. The problem with using a tool, as a solution to every challenge is that it makes multi-skilled people neutered and over reliant on something which should enhance your skill set, not solely consist of it.
 
Use of AI

Generative AI is a tool which is utilised by people as the 'be all - end all'. The problem with using a tool, as a solution to every challenge is that it makes multi-skilled people neutered and over reliant on something which should enhance your skill set, not solely consist of it.

That's the reason I said the bubble will burst, and less people will only continue to explore it.

However, you can't even trust the data you get from these machines in some industries, you have to verify it yourself.
 
Ranking content is what I am after, and not passing the 100% human authorship test.
If you’re talking about intent, E-E-A-T, and all that jazz — you need to use the special prompt to check it. properly it's the thing, not just 100% human-written. i remember the masterpices of some "meat"-copywriters - their trash even worst then ai does
 
Last edited:
What's the best AI writer to outsmart AI detector?
There's no such thing as AI detectors, especially if you are talking about Google. Even if it would actually work, it would cost them insane datapower to run AI detection on each page it ranks, even if they just did it for what ranks on page 1.
 
There's no such thing as AI detectors, especially if you are talking about Google. Even if it would actually work, it would cost them insane datapower to run AI detection on each page it ranks, even if they just did it for what ranks on page 1.
not sure) if you publish the text with "..in this fast paced world.." and with the other similar cliches - this will die instantly in google index. in case of no intent, no eeat - it will die slower, but anyway. AI detectors by itself don't exist, it's jsut a set of instructions to analyze the given text for some predefined factors (depends on how its prescribed in them) - you even can create your own ai-detector for you only
 
I've been using AI, chat GPT and others to write articles for 2 years now, and I can say this is not going to fly as expected or claimed.

Last year, I generated 500+ articles using different prompts, and was later adding human touches to improve their quality and use for Parasites and Guest posts.

With my experience with these contents, mostly generated by Chat GPT, it's just a bubble that's about to burst.

The buzz of AI writers is almost gone.
You can say the strength lies on prompt engineering, AI will get better in the future, more AI writing machine will be developed just like people claim DeepSeek is better than ChatGPT today bla bla bla bla.

AI contents lack Credibility and Reliability, 2 important factors in Data analysis.

Of what use is data that's not reliable?

If writers would have to understand the topic, and be able to proofread and remove non-factual sentences before using a generated article on a blog with real audience, then, such contents are useless.

I think more people will not border to use AI writers for serious projects in the future unless you're offering services.
AI content serves to sell.
 
What's the best AI writer to outsmart AI detector?
Look, you are stressing over zero AI traces. Yeah, that’s a thing, but the real deal is having solid E-E-A-T baked into the text and making sure it actually fits the intent. Nail that, and you'll see the lack of AI fingerprints will be your free addition. any schmuck can slap together some garbage text. So what if they do?
 
Back
Top