AI content is worthless change my mind

Just thinking about which content is clicked or which ad converts. It is the best one, the most original etc. When you use ChatGPT or other AI tools to just mass create your content no one would ever click it since you don't stand out. You might be able to create a shit tone of content but who cares when it isn't great. Why would anyone click on an average ad or pice of content, which AI usually creates rather than on something new and original.

AfolfKittler said:

Just thinking about which content is clicked or which ad converts. It is the best one, the most original etc. When you use ChatGPT or other AI tools to just mass create your content no one would ever click it since you don't stand out. You might be able to create a shit tone of content but who cares when it isn't great. Why would anyone click on an average ad or pice of content, which AI usually creates rather than on something new and original.

Click to expand...

So, I could link a bunch of projects & Youtube videos that others do showcasing $70k+ made in 6 months with AI content.

I could link you examples of entire marketing campaigns created with AI content & the structure of which was created by AI.

I'm not. I'm just going to mention that prompting is the key here and with decent prompting, you can create a lot of good content that requires minimal editing.

Anyone doing so should still edit the content, but "worthless" is a massive underestimation.

It is not a 'push button generate content' solution. If you think it will spit out perfectly written articles, then you're just stupid. It has its place, I refrain from using it on my blog but to each their own.

There are few problems with your point of view @AfolfKittler .
- "best", "most oryginal one" is point of view. AI can produce dope content, if you dont see it you didnt play enough with AI.
- Shit ton of average content is better than few good articles. In some niches its numbers game.

Why would anyone click on an average ad or pice of content

Click to expand...

Why would anyone eat at mcdonalds or eat pizaa with pineapple?
Why would anyone pay for some random bit*** nudes or foot pics?

PHPInjected said:

So, I could link a bunch of projects & Youtube videos that others do showcasing $70k+ made in 6 months with AI content.

I could link you examples of entire marketing campaigns created with AI content & the structure of which was created by AI.

I'm not. I'm just going to mention that prompting is the key here and with decent prompting, you can create a lot of good content that requires minimal editing.

Anyone doing so should still edit the content, but "worthless" is a massive underestimation.

Click to expand...

I really should had rephrased it, my main thing was that just relying on AI with no prior skill is worthless since you create the same product as everyone else but I think with prior knowledge it can really boost productivity I guess

AfolfKittler said:

I really should had rephrased it, my main thing was that just relying on AI with no prior skill is worthless since you create the same product as everyone else but I think with prior knowledge it can really boost productivity I guess

Click to expand...

AI get more effective when used in conjunction with human expertise. Like you have a deeper understanding on creatively solving problems

Yes it's worthless because google can detect it and doesn't rank it as much.

It depends on how you use it.

If you use it will, you will get some amazing results for almost anything.

The more you use it, the more you get better at it.

If edited well, AI content can be high quality.

At the end of the day it's all about how much money you make. If AI content can get you 1000 average articles in the same time frame it takes human writers to get you 10 amazing articles and your conversion rate is 1% for AI and 10% for human content, AI beats it easily.


Why? Because in most cases 1000 articles will get you much more traffic much faster than 10 human articles can. Let's assume you get an average of 10 visits an article for AI content and 100 an article for human content, do the math and you'll see which one is the better choice.


Of course, AI may not be a good option for all types of content and this may work better in some niches than others.


The majority of the content written on my best performing site is still done by humans and that's because that works the best for my niche. It's highly technical and only 1 average/weak article hurts the readers perception of my whole site. It's also very targeted and has a limited amount topics, so if I can only write around 100 articles I better make them as HQ as I can. In my case I gain nothing by using AI for content. For other projects it makes more sense.

I would agree that there are almost too many AI article generator apps, tools, and APIs around, and most of them use about the same GPT4 model, with some minor changes/twists.

You just have to be more creative, maybe like -
1.) Scrape search results/snippets for specific target keywords off foreign language Google results.
2.) Translate scraped results/snippets to English, with good NLP like Deepl.
3.) Then give those translated ''results/snippets'' as context to AI, to write more unique English articles.

you just need to be smart and creative enough to make it stand out.