ahrefs vs MajesticSEO
- Thread starter johndea
- Start date
- Jul 23, 2010
- 3,191
- 334
ahrefs is slicker and has a better interface and looks far prettier. However once you get used to Majestic I think it gives far more data but it is expensive and annoying at first.
I bet both rubbed their hands when yahoo site explorer eventually stopped.
I bet both rubbed their hands when yahoo site explorer eventually stopped.
oinky222
BANNED
- Oct 2, 2010
- 392
- 178
Ahrefs is better than Majestic SEO I think. If you do a raw export you have no limits on links whereas Majestic SEO only gives you like 1500 or 2500 links or something like that (cant remember exactly) so you get way more links with Ahrefs, and Ahrefs is also cheaper if i remember correctly
Personally though I think SEO Spyglass is better than both. It's a one-time payment and gives more detailed data
Personally though I think SEO Spyglass is better than both. It's a one-time payment and gives more detailed data
Getwhatchuwant
Elite Member
- Jul 25, 2011
- 1,998
- 1,336
what I like about ahrefs is you can put a url in and it tells you the KW's the site is ranking for without having to put them in like other tools. It makes not having a google account a smaller deal. One downside is that it updates slowly, I had a site on page 1 and it was showing like the 60th position on ahrefs for the longest time. It finally has caught up however.
fathobbitsss
Junior Member
- Jun 17, 2011
- 106
- 21
majestic has the most comprehensive data, though it limits how much of it you can export. also link discovery chart is useful.
i personally use majestic and the free version of ose
i personally use majestic and the free version of ose
BackBlasts
Junior Member
- Aug 29, 2010
- 105
- 18
I use majestic, its the best in my opinion. My only biggest gripe is the hourly report limits they impose. On the entry level paid plan you can only get 10 reports per hour.