Ahrefs vs Majestic vs Seomoz
- Thread starter TheGamer
- Start date
Leon Belmont
Newbie
- Feb 5, 2017
- 7
- 0
They are pretty much doing different things. SEO Moz has opensite explorer which is far more accurate than the backlink checker of ahrefs. Majestic provided good analysis for the backlinks as well as the Trust/Citation Flow. Each one of them has its advantages. I would say get all of them if you can, but if you are on a budget start with ahrefs. Definitely the best one in my opinion.
Cheers
Cheers
mynameisfrankenstein
Regular Member
- Apr 2, 2015
- 429
- 385
check thread creation tine before bumping 4 year old useless thread
Leon Belmont
Newbie
- Feb 5, 2017
- 7
- 0
I felt bad that nobody responded XD
bekemew
Supreme Member
- Dec 27, 2015
- 1,202
- 691
MOZ - Good balanced toolset covering content, offsite, and technical SEO considerations. Link database is smaller than ahrefs/majestic but getting larger all the time, and focuses on higher quality links and less "noise" from spam and scraper sites.
Ahrefs - Very thorough link database, and some of their newer tools are strong.
Majestic - Very thorough link database.
Ahrefs - Very thorough link database, and some of their newer tools are strong.
Majestic - Very thorough link database.
CookServers
Junior Member
- Mar 15, 2017
- 196
- 16
I think Majestic's TF is pretty accurate when it comes to passing the link juice. But Ahref & Moz isn't too bad either as every tool has its pros and cons. Actually using the 3 together can compensate one another's flaws, and the 3 combined together can be a very powerful tool indeed. Too bad Ahref has taken their 'free' away, Moz is free and that's excellent, Majestic looks like had some problems with their TF engine.
