Ahrefs or Majestic

The_Magician

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
308
Reaction score
110
Hi i was checked one website in Ahref Premium which is showing RD

upload_2019-12-13_15-8-54.png

same website i was checked on Majestic extension but it shows different results

upload_2019-12-13_15-13-40.png
 
if i use premium Majestic tool it will show same RD like Ahref?
You will not. They are different tools. Ahrefs is faster when it comes to crawling to you will probably always see more on Ahrefs than Majestic.
 
The score you get with majestic and ahrefs are really different. For my site I have a trustflow of 29 but on ahrefs a page rank of like 1.

I would choose Majestic, it is a better tool overal
 
Thanks For Your Suggestions

You will not. They are different tools. Ahrefs is faster when it comes to crawling to you will probably always see more on Ahrefs than Majestic.

The score you get with majestic and ahrefs are really different. For my site I have a trustflow of 29 but on ahrefs a page rank of like 1.

I would choose Majestic, it is a better tool overal
 
Both have their own features.
I would suggest Ahrefs.
 
Yes now-a-days Ahrefs is much faster then Majestic
I would suggest Ahrefs
 
If you have a good budget you may go with Ahrefs which nowadays is the one with the largest database. If you are planning to go through a GB, Ahrefs generally sucks because of it intense limits, so I may prefer a super combo of Majestic + SERPstat + CognitiveSEO that generally can be found for less than $20 and you will get a summed up larger database (although you have to be tackling 3 sites at the same tie)

Personally I feel comfortable with Majestic and may prefer to have it than not to have it if I'm in a low budget (despite this is an unpopular opinion). I grew up with Majestic after all, although I cannot live with Ahrefs nowadays.

Don't make me choose :D
 
Ahrefs all the time. One of the most important tool nowadays.
 
The score you get with majestic and ahrefs are really different. For my site I have a trustflow of 29 but on ahrefs a page rank of like 1.

I would choose Majestic, it is a better tool overal


Different tool use different algo to give final score of a metric. PR to TF are not comparable.
 
Thanks for your suggestion

Yes now-a-days Ahrefs is much faster then Majestic
I would suggest Ahrefs

Personally I feel comfortable with Majestic and may prefer to have it than not to have it if I'm in a low budget (despite this is an unpopular opinion). I grew up with Majestic after all, although I cannot live with Ahrefs nowadays.

Don't make me choose :D[/QUOTE]

Ahrefs all the time. One of the most important tool nowadays.

Comparing the both ahrefs is the best one

which is the more important for PBN Backlinks TF or DR or RD

Different tool use different algo to give final score of a metric. PR to TF are not comparable.

If you have a good budget you may go with Ahrefs which nowadays is the one with the largest database. If you are planning to go through a GB, Ahrefs generally sucks because of it intense limits, so I may prefer a super combo of Majestic + SERPstat + CognitiveSEO that generally can be found for less than $20 and you will get a summed up larger database (although you have to be tackling 3 sites at the same tie)
 
Could all the people who posted; "I say go with AHREFs " or "I say go with Majestic" give sound reasoning.

Let's see why you suggest which tools, what are the merits, the downsides.
 
which one is you suggest Ahrefs or Majestic for RD, which one i have to consider.
Could all the people who posted; "I say go with AHREFs " or "I say go with Majestic" give sound reasoning.

Let's see why you suggest which tools, what are the merits, the downsides.
 
Ahrefs is superior in every way.
1. Their backlink database is bigger, fresher and better than any other tool, including Majestic.
2. They give you a ton of more useful data which Majestic doesnt have at all - organic traffic, keywords, keywords explorer and what not.
 
which one is you suggest Ahrefs or Majestic for RD, which one i have to consider.


Majestic could be classed as a one trick pony, it's great for checking competition, backlinks etc. The Inbound feature in Referring Domains Site Explorer Report, is a nice feature.
It's cheaper than Ahrefs, but it depends on which metric you choose to determine rankings and domains.
The new Related Sites feature is another nice addition.

If you go with TF/CF, then this is the one for you. Topical Trust Flow, some people like, but it's not the be all and end all. @splishsplash did a nice write up on how these can easily be manipulated.


AHREFs is like a Swiss army knife, it's ideal for checking competitors. It's also got a great keyword research tool in there.
The DR as a metric is quite accurate, in my opinion more so than DA from MOZ.
I can put a domain into AHREFs and scroll down the page and immediately see anchors, so if I'm considering buying and see it's full of porn/Chinese/Japanese text, that alone stops be going any further.

AHREFS is also great for ranktracking and reverse engineering sites. The Content Explorer is another really useful tool, if you use it.


Dixon Jones and Tim Soulo are both nice guys, share some great information on how to get the most out of each tool.

If I was going to pick just one of these 2, it'd be AHREFs everytime.
 
Majestic could be classed as a one trick pony, it's great for checking competition, backlinks etc. The Inbound feature in Referring Domains Site Explorer Report, is a nice feature.
It's cheaper than Ahrefs, but it depends on which metric you choose to determine rankings and domains.
The new Related Sites feature is another nice addition.

If you go with TF/CF, then this is the one for you. Topical Trust Flow, some people like, but it's not the be all and end all. @splishsplash did a nice write up on how these can easily be manipulated.


AHREFs is like a Swiss army knife, it's ideal for checking competitors. It's also got a great keyword research tool in there.
The DR as a metric is quite accurate, in my opinion more so than DA from MOZ.
I can put a domain into AHREFs and scroll down the page and immediately see anchors, so if I'm considering buying and see it's full of porn/Chinese/Japanese text, that alone stops be going any further.

AHREFS is also great for ranktracking and reverse engineering sites. The Content Explorer is another really useful tool, if you use it.


Dixon Jones and Tim Soulo are both nice guys, share some great information on how to get the most out of each tool.

If I was going to pick just one of these 2, it'd be AHREFs everytime.



Yeah, DR is a good metric.

When it comes to TF..

If it's low, the site could be great.
If it's high, the site could be garbage.

This is the problem with TF.

But with DR..

If it's high, the site is definitely great. I've never seen a DR50+ that's not great and I've never seen a DR30-50 that's not good.

DR20-30 is more unreliable. A DR25 can be garbage.


With DR, if it's low, the site could still be good, but unlike TF, when DR is high, the site is definitely good. This is the core difference with them now.

Majestic has gotten so bad, it's just not worth it by its self now. You really can't judge a domain with majestic anymore. It misses so many good backlinks.

For RDs, I personally export ahrefs and majestic, remove duplicates and that's my count, but if I were to only use one, it would definitely have to be ahrefs.
 
Back
Top