Aged domain registered date

Jev_bh

Power Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2022
Messages
525
Reaction score
90
When looking up an aged domain of say 3 years old (on whois.com for example), when the domain is re-activated, will it show that that the domain is 3 years old or the date the aged domain become active again?

Ultimately if I buy an aged domain I would like it to be 3 years old and not a day old. That’s the goal.

Thanks guys.
 
IIRC, if it was dropped, it will show the new date of registration, but modern Google isn't based on WHOIS data like it was 25 years ago. They have enough historical data to make a decision, and you're better off restoring the content of the old website (ex. via archive.org) rather than fidgeting with WHOIS data.
 
When looking up an aged domain of say 3 years old (on whois.com for example), when the domain is re-activated, will it show that that the domain is 3 years old or the date the aged domain become active again?

Ultimately if I buy an aged domain I would like it to be 3 years old and not a day old. That’s the goal.

Thanks guys.

Basically what @atlas_http said.

It's absolutely irrelevant. Once you register the domain and start uploading content that gets indexed, then and only then the age starts to matter. It's the age of content that matters, not a Whois number.

Do some of you really think that in 2024, Google is as retarded as to grant you ranking bonus because your domain was first registered 20 years ago? I understand that it's easy to grasp concept "Hurr durr, whois number up, seo up, uga uga!" but really, get a grip.
 
I would ask does google consider newly registered domain (with 0 content obviously) exactly same as a domain registered 3 years back with 0 content?
Yes or no? Or I don't know.
If yes why?
If no why?
 
I asked same to chatgpt+ heres what it said , so take what its worth:

No, Google does not consider a newly registered domain (with 0 content) exactly the same as a domain that was registered 3 years back but also has 0 content. The reasons for this are primarily related to how search engines, including Google, assess and rank websites, which involves factors beyond just the presence or absence of content. Here are a few key points to consider:
  1. Domain Age: Domain age can be a factor in search engine rankings, but it's not just about how long a domain has been registered. It's more about how long a website has been active, providing valuable content, and being involved in the web ecosystem through backlinks and user engagement. A domain that's been registered longer but has no content or web presence might not necessarily rank better than a new domain simply because of its age.
  2. Trust and Authority: Over time, a domain can accumulate trust and authority through backlinks, user engagement, and content quality. A domain registered 3 years ago but without content has not had the opportunity to build this trust and authority. In this sense, both domains (newly registered and one registered 3 years ago without content) might start from a similar baseline when they begin to publish content and engage with the web ecosystem.
  3. Historical Data: For a domain that's been around longer, even without content, there may be some historical data that Google can access, such as registration history, any past content (if it ever existed), or previous ownership. This historical data might influence how Google views the domain, but without content, this influence is likely minimal in terms of search rankings.
  4. Engagement and Development: A newly registered domain starts with a clean slate and has the potential to quickly establish itself by publishing quality content, obtaining backlinks, and engaging users. The age of the domain in this context is less important than the actions taken by the website owner to develop and promote the site.
In summary, while domain age can be a factor in search engine considerations, the lack of content negates the potential benefits that an older domain might have in terms of trust and authority. Both a newly registered domain and a domain registered 3 years ago with zero content would need to focus on developing quality content, engaging users, and building backlinks to improve their search engine rankings.

but both has 0 content so take the content and backlinks out of equation



If we strictly take content and backlinks out of the equation, focusing solely on the aspect of domain age (a newly registered domain vs. a domain registered 3 years back, both with 0 content), the differences in how Google considers these domains become minimal in terms of search ranking or visibility. Without content or backlinks, neither domain is likely to rank well for any search queries, as these are two of the most significant factors Google uses to understand, evaluate, and rank websites.

The age of a domain, in isolation, is a minor factor compared to the presence of content and backlinks. Google's primary goal is to provide users with relevant, high-quality content that answers their search queries. A domain with no content does not contribute to this goal, regardless of how long it has been registered.

In the absence of content and backlinks:

  • Both domains are effectively invisible to Google's search results because there's nothing to index or rank.
  • Domain age alone is not a strong ranking signal. Google has indicated that while older domains might have more opportunity to gain trust, the direct impact of domain age on rankings is minimal.
Therefore, without considering content, backlinks, or any form of user engagement and site development, both a newly registered domain and a domain registered 3 years back with 0 content are on a level playing field in Google's eyes. The critical step to gaining visibility and ranking in search results for either domain would be to start generating high-quality, relevant content and obtaining backlinks, which are fundamental to SEO strategies.
 
IIRC, if it was dropped, it will show the new date of registration, but modern Google isn't based on WHOIS data like it was 25 years ago. They have enough historical data to make a decision, and you're better off restoring the content of the old website (ex. via archive.org) rather than fidgeting with WHOIS data.
When you say dropped do you mean the domain become expired sorry?
 
When you snag an aged domain, the original registration date sticks. What you see on WHOIS is the birth certificate of that domain – it keeps its original "born on" date, not the "adopted on" date. They've got history, and search engines respect that.
 
When you snag an aged domain, the original registration date sticks. What you see on WHOIS is the birth certificate of that domain – it keeps its original "born on" date, not the "adopted on" date. They've got history, and search engines respect that.
So if I buy the aged domain it’s the birth certificate date you will see not the date I re-registered the domain as active again? If that make sense..?
 
IIRC, if it was dropped, it will show the new date of registration, but modern Google isn't based on WHOIS data like it was 25 years ago. They have enough historical data to make a decision, and you're better off restoring the content of the old website (ex. via archive.org) rather than fidgeting with WHOIS data.
Just want to follow up on my previous post because Google just confirmed what I've been saying via an official statement today:
Occasionally, expired domains are purchased and repurposed with the primary intention of boosting search ranking of low-quality or unoriginal content. This can mislead users into thinking the new content is part of the older site, which may not be the case. Expired domains that are purchased and repurposed with the intention of boosting the search ranking of low-quality content are now considered spam.
https://blog.google/products/search/google-search-update-march-2024/
 
I recently got a domain from Namecheap. Upon further inspection, I discovered that the domain was previously purchased in 2017. However, the age of the domain is reflected in the date when I purchased it.
 
Back
Top