Aged Accounts Vs New Accounts

Old accounts have a spending history so they are more trustworthy and prevent ads from being rejected multiple times, and accounts will be less likely to die.
 
Surely the old account will be much better than the new account. Old accounts will often be more reliable, have more stability, and are less likely to be banned
 
Older accounts are often stronger because they have a long spending history, new accounts are often more likely to be flagged and swept.
 
Even if you create new Facebook accounts, you need to keep them active—this means posting, liking, and interacting. I have a few accounts I made last year, and I maintain them with MaxCare. I even have a script set up to make it super easy to manage, so you don’t have to worry about it.

For managing Facebook accounts, I use MaxCare, and for bulk Facebook spam, I use Fefewd. As long as you stick to using a single IP—a stable residential proxy—and avoid switching it frequently, while doing all your activities from that same IP, you won’t get flagged by Facebook for spam or face any restrictions.

Whether it’s an old account or a new one, if you don’t know how to control it properly, you’ll end up with restrictions like checkpoints, selfie verification, or even ID requests. A Facebook account needs daily activity; if you only log in to spam and nothing else, Facebook detects that behavior. The more you spam without balancing it with normal activity, the more Facebook catches on.
This are my script to mentain my account fb.
1736418882517.png
 
Last edited:
I am using aged FB accounts for automation, works better and longer
 
New Facebook accounts are a headache—constant restrictions and bans make scaling almost impossible. Aged accounts, on the other hand, are a game-changer. They come with trust and stability, letting you run ads without worrying about sudden disruptions. Anyone else using aged accounts to avoid restrictions?
Yes, aged accounts are more stable to use. If you buy in bulk, it will also cost reasonable.
 
Are you still advertising now, things have gotten much better.
 
Aged accounts are definitely the way to go for smoother scaling. I've been using them for a while, and the difference is night and day. New accounts are a gamble, you spend more time appealing bans than running campaigns. With aged accounts, especially those with a solid activity history, you can focus on scaling instead of firefighting. Just make sure to warm them up properly and use a good proxy to avoid getting flagged
 
Your opinion is the same as mine, old accounts have higher reliability and stability as well as recommendability than new accounts, a lot of professional advertisers and Ngu Ngu Agencies are using this strategy
 
Maybe old accounts will be more trusted, bring stability, but not all new accounts are bad, you can test with healthy activity before starting
 
New Facebook accounts are a headache—constant restrictions and bans make scaling almost impossible. Aged accounts, on the other hand, are a game-changer. They come with trust and stability, letting you run ads without worrying about sudden disruptions. Anyone else using aged accounts to avoid restrictions?
aged accounts have more authority than neew onces
 
I want to post a bunch of links to pages. Old accounts usually have a pretty strong spending history. It will help you limit account bans compared to new accounts.
 
New Facebook accounts are a headache—constant restrictions and bans make scaling almost impossible. Aged accounts, on the other hand, are a game-changer. They come with trust and stability, letting you run ads without worrying about sudden disruptions. Anyone else using aged accounts to avoid restrictions?
it depends largely on your campaign. the account is just a product holder. if the product is good then it's fine, if it's not good it will be demolished
 
Back
Top