$668 in 2.5 hours...

after reading so much All I can gasp is, RED has the highest probability for a win. LOL or am I wrong.?
 
Taking on a negative expectation game is just madness. There is a guy from norway on casinomeister forum who admits to having lost $750,000 gambling online. The other day he vowed to gamble for the last time and ended up winning $5000 from $80 deposit at a casino where during the year he lost $12,000 and he is over the moon about it. Winning is the compulsive gamblers downfall.
 
Again we have post that are just posting with any knownledge the post is about using Roulette Sniper .Not about just playing Roulette without the software.

Note Roulette Sniper Review http://www.roulettesystemwinner.com/online_roulette.php

Loser in the game because of one of three things:

1. He or she played at a casino which does not fit our Roulette Software OK criteria.

2. He or she played roulette with an american wheel, (5.4% house edge) and not a french roulette wheel using the La Partage rule (1.35% house edge!).

3. Lastly, he or she played for far too long of a session because he or she gets greedy. This is how casinos make money, the longer you play the quicker the house edge creeps up and unlucky consistant badluck numbers start appearing. Casinos don't like you winning big, so they tend to stop you in your tracks. By using a 'Hit n Run' strategy, with short sessions, on multiple casinos you escape a winner
 
what the hell was up with that youtube video? was it supposed to be glorified by jay-zs voice? I mean to say it wasnt very entertaining
 
Winning in the short term is a myth. Many short term=long term anyway. I still play the bonuses still and last month I lost all my money right off the bat. Played in october and managed to come out trumps playing for very long spells. The house edge does not change long or short term and that is why roulette sniper is tripe and I've used it btw.
 
This is very interesting stuff, I don't gamble and probably won't start now, but it's cool to see how it's working for you. Hope your good fortune continues!
 
This software sucks and stole my money. I lost an easy $1000 with this software and then after that I decided to research roulette.
I now know what roulette is and how to play it...lol.... and I still have to say RouletteSniper sucks. There is no way for a software to help you win... I just don't care what you say. The software creator steals the 40 bucks it costs to buy it and then he steals money from the player who deposits into the casinos he recommends!!! Even if you get a refund (which I did) he still gets commission from the $1000 bucks I have deposited.

I hope the loser who created this software feels bad.... haha!

Live and learn I guess...

P.S. I did research and discovered that the dumb owner is giving RouletteSniper away under a different name for FREE... google CasinoBuddy to find it. This is BlackHat eh!?! haha
 
...
You are entirely missing the point. THE ROULETTE WHEEL HAS NO MEMORY. All this talk of "tracking" is a lot of poppycock...But, superman, I give you the opportunity to show me the math behind why the history of the ball will help bring the house edge into the negative. If you can mathematically show me that the outcome of the roulette wheel indeed is dependent upon factors such as the time of day and the history of the ball I will renounce my claim that this is a lot of bogus.

A real roulette wheel has no memory. Don't forget online casinos are programmed and the programming could have some footprints or run certain patterns although they could be very unique and hard to identify patterns. As for the time of day bit, I can't help you there. I'm just saying that there are patterns in pretty much every type of programming, even supposedly random programming.

Also, please could you explain the math behind reason 3, superman.

You say that you can win big in the first hour, but after that you need to go to a new casino.

So basically you're saying in the first hour the player has the edge, then somehow something magical happens and the house gains an advantage and you have to go to another casino and start this magical process all over again?

You'll find it's called "luck in the short term". You might very well get lucky and win big in your first hour, the longer you play the smaller the odds are you'll continue to beat the odds.

It's not luck in the short term. What happens is the longer you play the worse the decisions you make. It's a known fact the more you play the more you lose focus. If you go to a real casino why do you think they give you as much free alcohol as you can drink? First they know the longer you stay the more you lose focus and add alcohol to the mix and your decisions get worse by the drink on top of the focus issue. It's a win-win for the casino. That's why you're suppose to keep moving on games. You're not supposed to stay at the same game unless you keep doubling up, no matter how much you're in the hole.

I wouldn't play roulette only because I don't know how to play, I'd prefer blackjack for quick money and Texas Hold 'Em for fun.
 
He plays a simple Martingale system. He bets a quarter and when he loses, he simply doubles up the bet.
I remember playing this style of betting in craps. It gets scary when you're doubling up to hundreds.

I don't need the Wizard of Odds to tell me that eventually, you're going to max the bet out and hit the table limit.

Duh.
I believe there was a casino that went bankrupt after the roulette table had 41 reds in a row.

Here's the deal. It's odds, but you're obviously having trouble looking at the odds from another angle. You have to win a lot of times without a bad run to profit. One bad run and you're done. The odds are that you're going to end up with a bad run that will bankrupt you (assuming you keep doubling up).

Just sayin'!
 
Last edited:
obviously do the math (like the software does for you so that you don't have to think) and the house always has an advantage of at least .25-.5%. Doesn't sound much but compound that several times (when you hit a loosing streak and use the dumb martingale system to get it back) and it JUMPS. Very risky.
 
lemme tell u once for all...roulette is NOT serious money..its FUN... put somthing which u can afford to lose....
p.s : martingale is dodgy
 
Roulette Sniper, R-Bet and the like are better than nothing, but they use progressive betting which can cancel your bankroll in a minute, the risks are to big. Furthermore, if you got lucky and keep winning, the casino will be tracking your moves each time and you're gone!
 
If you go to a real casino why do you think they give you as much free alcohol as you can drink? First they know the longer you stay the more you lose focus and add alcohol to the mix and your decisions get worse by the drink on top of the focus issue.

I could be wrong on this but I heard that in some Las Vegas casinos they actually pump oxygen through the air conditioner to keep gamblers alert so they can keep gambling as long as possible. So I am not sure about the above statement. In fact, in the uk, you are not allowed to serve alcohol at the tables or drink it and still I've not seen one casino go bust.
 
Haha... opps. Today I read through the entire posts and discovered the creator use to be here... what happened to him because I am sorry for what I said... I hope he didn't leave because of me :P

I still think RS is crap though as well as all those other roulette software :@
 
Online gambling is a horrible idea, as is gambling period. I have personally found this out the hard way. Just saying.
 
Back
Top