5000 + forum backlinks pr9,9,7,6 etc.

nofollow accounts for less than 3% of the websites on the ENTIRE NET

so how can getting nofollowed backlinks make your site look more natural??? :rolleyes:

Google has over 70-80% of the search engine traffic and most of the stuff you do on Google will also apply to Bing/Yahoo


Why spend time building nofollow backlinks to only get less than 20% of search engine traffic? :rolleyes:


once you become a real linkbuilder you will never deal with a 'nofolllowed' link again.

getting a link that is nofollowed is a WASTE OF TIME
1. you have to waste time building it
2. it doesnt help in Google

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Google simply says nofollow doesn't pass link juice aka PR... Google has also recently said that PR doesn't matter. So... What's the point of not building a nofollow link?

For commenting at least, if I go to a blog, I can pretty much just as quickly manually post a comment as I can exit the page. So yes, I build it. Maybe profiles it's not worth it though. It's really up to the SE optimizer. I build nofollows.
 
"Many people say ignore nofollow sites but that's stupid."

sure wasn't nice either.....duh! take your own advice

Unlike yours my comment was not directed to a specific person and was not intended to discredit a specific person - in fact, it was not directed at a person at all but rather was my opinion about an idea. Now, had I said "nodoubtgq79 says to ignore nofollow sites but he's stupid" then you would be making an accurate comparison because I'd have been attacking and discrediting a specific person, not an idea. But, I wouldn't do that because I think using ad hominem attacks to support your case is self-defeating and actually makes your opposition look better.
 
google said no juice passes

i have built many nofollow links before and my rankings never went up

most of my clients build nofollow links and they NEVER go up in google rankings

i come along and put **************** links and they go up

forget about pr/trustrank and other terms.....if your rankings do NOT go up in Google then it's a waste

anyone who tells you that they go up in rankings with nofollowed links aren't telling you the truth

sometimes i have to do it because a client wants higher rankings in bing/yahoo, and i use all the links i can get
but that's once a blue moon

most clients want google rankings

it's not matter of opinion here

every LINKBUILDER knows that nofollow links are worth nothing to Google

i have gotten many links on wikipedia and my google rankings didn't change
most of the wikipedia pages had at least a pr5....but the rankings didn't change. only bing and yahoo




Correct me if I'm wrong, but Google simply says nofollow doesn't pass link juice aka PR... Google has also recently said that PR doesn't matter. So... What's the point of not building a nofollow link?

For commenting at least, if I go to a blog, I can pretty much just as quickly manually post a comment as I can exit the page. So yes, I build it. Maybe profiles it's not worth it though. It's really up to the SE optimizer. I build nofollows.
 
you're basically stating that anyone who says the statement is saying something stupid

so if i came on this thread (like i did) you would be saying my statement is stupid :rolleyes:

it's a blanket statement that covers ANYONE who says it ...DUH!

maybe i'll just start writing like you and say that

"it will make you look like an idiot"

instead of just calling you an idiot directly

Unlike yours my comment was not directed to a specific person and was not intended to discredit a specific person - in fact, it was not directed at a person at all but rather was my opinion about an idea. Now, had I said "nodoubtgq79 says to ignore nofollow sites but he's stupid" then you would be making an accurate comparison because I'd have been attacking and discrediting a specific person, not an idea. But, I wouldn't do that because I think using ad hominem attacks to support your case is self-defeating and actually makes your opposition look better.
 
if your rankings do NOT go up in Google then it's a waste

Bullshit. Sorry, but that is plain and utter bullshit.

The goal of ranking well in the SERPs is to get traffic. If you can get nofollow links that drive traffic, you are MEETING THAT GOAL whether they raise your rank or not.

I have a client I'm currently working with who wants to rank on page 1 for a very difficult term. It will likely take several months of steady link building to get on page 1. While working towards that goal I'm also building links to drive traffic. All of those links are being built on niche blogs and forums - all of which are nofollow. He's getting 300-500 unques a day from those links and not a single hit from organic search for the competitive keywords. From that traffic he's sold over 750 memberships to his site.

Now, if I followed your advice to avoid nofollow links he'd be getting about 10 visitors a day, would have no sales and would be wondering what the fuck he's paying me for.

If you are so set in your mind about nofollow being worthless that you really can't see that they have other benefits besides ranking then I feel bad for your 'clients' because you're doing them a HUGE disservice.

Open your eyes and look at the big picture. SEO is more than just trying to get on page 1 of google and if you can't see that you're in the wrong business.
 
you're basically stating that anyone who says the statement is saying something stupid

so if i came on this thread (like i did) you would be saying my statement is stupid :rolleyes:

it's a blanket statement that covers ANYONE who says it ...DUH!

maybe i'll just start writing like you and say that

"it will make you look like an idiot"

instead of just calling you an idiot directly

*sigh* whatever. I typically don't argue with zealots as I find it to be a huge waste of time and energy. So I'm done. Good luck to you. One final thing though - there's a HUGE difference between saying an idea is stupid and saying a person is stupid. Smart people have stupid ideas all the time and calling the idea stupid is in no way a reflection of the intelligence of the person but rather a value of the idea... Attack the idea, don't attack the person. Attacking the person just makes you look like you don't have the skill to attack the idea.
 
Last edited:
i don't know if you have a problem reading or what

but i wrote WASTE for Google

who's talking about traffic?

I'm talking about SERPS not referral traffic :rolleyes:

and if takes you 2-3 months to get on page 1 then you obviously are not a linkbuilder :eek:





Bullshit. Sorry, but that is plain and utter bullshit.

The goal of ranking well in the SERPs is to get traffic. If you can get nofollow links that drive traffic, you are MEETING THAT GOAL whether they raise your rank or not.

I have a client I'm currently working with who wants to rank on page 1 for a very difficult term. It will likely take several months of steady link building to get on page 1. While working towards that goal I'm also building links to drive traffic. All of those links are being built on niche blogs and forums - all of which are nofollow. He's getting 300-500 unques a day from those links and not a single hit from organic search for the competitive keywords. From that traffic he's sold over 750 memberships to his site.

Now, if I followed your advice to avoid nofollow links he'd be getting about 10 visitors a day, would have no sales and would be wondering what the fuck he's paying me for.

If you are so set in your mind about nofollow being worthless that you really can't see that they have other benefits besides ranking then I feel bad for your 'clients' because you're doing them a HUGE disservice.

Open your eyes and look at the big picture. SEO is more than just trying to get on page 1 of google and if you can't see that you're in the wrong business.
 
Just curious - do you have a source for your claim that only 3% of sites use nofollow? Seems low to me.
 
dont have the link ready but it was posted on seomoz and other places

if you think about it, there's probably 3% of the web that actually understand what nofollow is

edit -
here's 1
http://seolutions.net/blog/rel-nofollow-google-pagerank-sculpting-seo/

"...one of the major algorithms in the google rankings (even thought the number of nofollowed links is less than 3 percent, as they mostly come from big sites). "

Just curious - do you have a source for your claim that only 3% of sites use nofollow? Seems low to me.
 
i dont understand, i sign up and then do what? post a few things to 5000+ websites

or i just add my website URL in what is your website,

When i join what should i do?

EDIT: i am new to the forum but when people like you just fight on things that you know no one will bother changing their mind about why even do it in the first place
 
Last edited:
Forum links are pretty rubbish anyway. I remember even doing an experiment on this.
 
Its true that Google do not count no-follow backlinks, but what about other search engines. Yahoo, Bing, All the Web and other Search engines gives equal priority to do-follow and no-follow. Although no-follow does not give back link but it gives traffic.
 
I read all the comment of nodoubtgq79 and mandom, felt somethg like debate but my queries are solved by u guys bravo n thnx 4 sch a wonderful debate :)
love to be in touch wid u both....
I m Workin as link builder for last 6 months learnt alot now i wanna do somethg 4 my own self to earn more money rather thn doin this same job 4 other :)
Hope u guys will help me :)
 
Awesome. Plenty of forum juice to go around. ;D
 
Man, this people don't know how to read, they are both arguing about different stuff.
One is saying that no follow links because they give traffic, and the other is saying what Google thinks about it, this is like staring to monkeys man.
 
Back
Top