$50 SENuke

I'd stay away from anything that requires monthly costs

I agree with you that monthly costs are a bummer but you need to remember - it's a service, not a product. They have to update it once a week or more, which they do, especially lately. I think the longest I had in between updates was 10 days. Even if it was a product, your logic is still a bit off IMHO. I hate to be "That guy" but once using automation for my web 2.0 marketing, after a few months I more than made up for the monthly costs. If it was a product I sold in my store, and I can buy it for $127, polish it up and make it work and turn around and sell it for $5,000 profit - my question would be how many of those can I buy a month.

FORTUNATELY - you can exponentially increase the profit per product by writing yourself or just buying UAW style spun articles to increase the yield of one product.

Think of it as buying a service to sell a whole lot of product. It's just good business. I can't advertise yearly on cable TV for a one time fee, it's $80,000 a month for one city. Yet I make a massive return on that investment. Of course very similarly to SEnuke I didn't make that money back right away. My commercials had to air for about 7 weeks before I started getting foot traffic and a ROI on that cable TV advertising.

My point is that it's bad advice. No business would operate if avoiding monthly costs was the correct train of thought. It's all about how much profitability you can generate for that investment and how soon you can bring that profitability to maturity.
 
Last edited:
just use the cracked version and save yourself the headache of a monthly cost
 
I agree with you that monthly costs are a bummer but you need to remember - it's a service, not a product. They have to update it once a week or more, which they do, especially lately. I think the longest I had in between updates was 10 days. Even if it was a product, your logic is still a bit off IMHO. I hate to be "That guy" but once using automation for my web 2.0 marketing, after a few months I more than made up for the monthly costs. If it was a product I sold in my store, and I can buy it for $127, polish it up and make it work and turn around and sell it for $5,000 profit - my question would be how many of those can I buy a month.

FORTUNATELY - you can exponentially increase the profit per product by writing yourself or just buying UAW style spun articles to increase the yield of one product.

Think of it as buying a service to sell a whole lot of product. It's just good business. I can't advertise yearly on cable TV for a one time fee, it's $80,000 a month for one city. Yet I make a massive return on that investment. Of course very similarly to SEnuke I didn't make that money back right away. My commercials had to air for about 7 weeks before I started getting foot traffic and a ROI on that cable TV advertising.

My point is that it's bad advice. No business would operate if avoiding monthly costs was the correct train of thought. It's all about how much profitability you can generate for that investment and how soon you can bring that profitability to maturity.

Best damn answer I ever saw here regarding subscription services..like people don't understand that a software like senuke from a coding stand point
is a lot of hard work keeping it updated and it's not a 1 man job, consumers should be happy its only 127.00 a month. it should cost more from all the money it will save u in the future marketing & advertising
 
127 per month is not that big a deal.

My issue is that most of SENuke doesn't work properly, making it a bad investment in this case.
 
My issue is that most of SENuke doesn't work properly, making it a bad investment in this case.

Well I can't say that I share that opinion. Occasionally some sites won't work properly, but I honestly don't need them to all work to use it to do enough SEO to make a hell of a lot of money.

I was under the impression that investments were looked at objectively based on their ROI, not subjectively on how pretty the graph looked.

There is more than enough redundancy built into the system by shear volume of sites that 100% operational efficiency isn't nearly as important as it is with lesser, more narrow focused software platforms.

Fact is, if you aren't making well more than 4-5x your investment after a few months then it's not the software's fault, it's the operator.
 
I used SEnuke but web profiles (example: forums profile) work so slow
I think this tool not good
 
I used SEnuke but web profiles (example: forums profile) work so slow
I think this tool not good

Yeah, in your case there are better software platforms at the moment.

SEnuek is mostly used for create WEB 2.0 blogs and sites, for which I find it very effective. Social bookmarking and RSS Feed submissions is a bonus. I don't use it for profiles either though. That's Xrumer's job :)

I suppose if I used a hammer to dig a hole, I'd have trouble thinking it was a good investment as well. Especially when I saw the shovel for sale across the street.
 
Fact is, if you aren't making well more than 4-5x your investment after a few months then it's not the software's fault, it's the operator.

Of course and the fact they don't have any real competition yet makes SENuke fairly valuable. Personally though I'd rather code and upgrade my own bots, not because of the cost but because they actually work properly.

The bookmark and pinging modules are nothing special.

The profile creation module is not very good.

The web 2.0 creation module is terrible.

The video upload module is hardly a big deal.

Can I make the money back for SENuke whilst using it, sure, but frankly If I'm going to invest in a tool I would like it to actually work as advertised. Not roughly half of it works and just accept that is ok, if it was anything other than a black hat tool there is no way I would accept that kind of BS, so really why should I accept it for this software.
 
Of course and the fact they don't have any real competition yet makes SENuke fairly valuable. Personally though I'd rather code and upgrade my own bots, not because of the cost but because they actually work properly.

The bookmark and pinging modules are nothing special.

The profile creation module is not very good.

The web 2.0 creation module is terrible.

The video upload module is hardly a big deal.

Can I make the money back for SENuke whilst using it, sure, but frankly If I'm going to invest in a tool I would like it to actually work as advertised. Not roughly half of it works and just accept that is ok, if it was anything other than a black hat tool there is no way I would accept that kind of BS, so really why should I accept it for this software.

all I read was "wahhhhhhhhhhhhh wahhhhhhh wahhhhhhhhhhhh". Seriously, you dont HAVE to use it. Im more than happy to pay the measly 127/month.
 
all I read was "wahhhhhhhhhhhhh wahhhhhhh wahhhhhhhhhhhh". Seriously, you dont HAVE to use it. Im more than happy to pay the measly 127/month.

Your quite right I dont have to use, in fact I dont use it anymore (and im far from the only one who has used it and then stopped).

I dont not use it because of the price, it would be well worth the price if all the modules actually worked.
 
Saves me in time well over what it costs in dollars.

Yes there are cracked versions, yes they are cheaper, and yes they work until something breaks. Unfortunately, it takes longer to re distribute a new crack than it does for the SEnuke team to fix things that break.

You're also not going to find any cracks here, it's on the do not share list. As someone who's used both the cracks and the real thing: just buy it.
 
Of course and the fact they don't have any real competition yet makes SENuke fairly valuable. Personally though I'd rather code and upgrade my own bots, not because of the cost but because they actually work properly.

The bookmark and pinging modules are nothing special.

The profile creation module is not very good.

The web 2.0 creation module is terrible.

The video upload module is hardly a big deal.

Can I make the money back for SENuke whilst using it, sure, but frankly If I'm going to invest in a tool I would like it to actually work as advertised. Not roughly half of it works and just accept that is ok, if it was anything other than a black hat tool there is no way I would accept that kind of BS, so really why should I accept it for this software.

Just remember that when saying things, all of that is opinion, not fact.

I love the WEB 2.0 creation module. I use it to create properties that I use for other programs....

The bookmarking module is also great for prompting money sites. I own other bookmarking programs and use SENuke exclusively for the task...

I'm saying these things not to convince you, but to remind you that your opinions aren't shared by everyone so please don't present them as fact.
 
That is very incorrect. There is much competition for SENuke out there....Brute Force Evo 2, XgenSeo, and LinkBuilderPro. They all do the same thing basically (post your article, create web 2.0 profiles, social bookmark, rss feed submit). IMO SENuke is the most updated, but the other three are cheaper and work almost as good.

Of course and the fact they don't have any real competition yet makes SENuke fairly valuable. Personally though I'd rather code and upgrade my own bots, not because of the cost but because they actually work properly.

The bookmark and pinging modules are nothing special.

The profile creation module is not very good.

The web 2.0 creation module is terrible.

The video upload module is hardly a big deal.

Can I make the money back for SENuke whilst using it, sure, but frankly If I'm going to invest in a tool I would like it to actually work as advertised. Not roughly half of it works and just accept that is ok, if it was anything other than a black hat tool there is no way I would accept that kind of BS, so really why should I accept it for this software.
 
Back
Top