5 Possible Proofs of Alien Intelligence

I also believe This world or universe as We know it Is Pixelated As we Are In some sort of Super being computer Like a Game! I mean come on if Anythings Possible in A game And Anythings possible here Then Can't that Be a possibility??? Don't you think?
 
I've done extensive research on ufo's and aliens for several years.

I came to the conclusion that I don't believe in aliens for the mere fact that there has been no real good footage of them.

Think about it.

If there's really thousands of spaceships flying around, then you would think out of the hundreds of millions of cameras available today that someone would actually get a good footage? (not a speck or dot in the air)

And also wouldn't you think someone would catch a footage of an actual alien exiting their space craft?

To me it just seems like a bunch of people (military, pilots, marines, normal people, scientists, etc.) all referring to alien spaceships that they saw in the 70's and 80's. Yet, you never hear about any recent ACTUAL footage of real aliens.

So I don't believe in them due to a lack of evidence.

And the most popular argument for supporting aliens is that there are billions of stars, therefore, there are other life forms out there, however, this is not actual fact but merely an assumption.

Aliens don't have to be from outerspace.

They can be inter-dimensional entities. They can be living in the deep oceans of Earth. They can be living underneath the ground "Hollow Earth" theories. They can be living deep inside the mountains like the monks in Tibet have said.

Either way you look at it, it comes down to the same conclusion:

If aliens exist or not, how would that benefit you?

If the governments of the world admitted aliens exist, then what?

People will simply go back to their daily routines.

If you want to research something interesting, then go and research the Secret Sauce that Fast Food companies use in their food products which cause amnesia within humans (True Fact), which make them more susceptible to Mind Control.

Bobby wait a Bit longer! We'll see soon because "A lack Of evidence is Only our Lack Of Intelligence"
 
"Intelligent" life probably has capabilities we cant see so how can humans have an informed debate on it? They manipulate time & space, cut out what has been left for us to see, and do what we would never think of. Fun topic though.
 
Exactly as above has mentioned.

And further, my earlier posts on Remote Viewing. Without our limited intelligence, we are able to Remote View and attain knowledge about things without verbally or physically reading anything to learn. We attain this knowledge by somehow, in some direct or indirect way accessing a bit / portion of our subconcious. As I said before, this was used by the US military and has been documented - it is not a myth or a 'maybe' - it is real.

So, if WE can harness this, what is to say more advanced beings can't already know what we are doing, what we are up to, etc by tapping into this subconciousness? They don't have to physically be here to know what we're up to, they could be much more advanced than that - I mean, we're already advanced like that to a certain degree (with RV). We're all connected.

Here is an extract from an ebook I purchased. It is an EXCELLENT ebook that I absolutely loved to read. It is largely focused on accessing the power of your mind, free energy and scientific stuff. This guys explains it in a really dumbed down way.


Here is an extract of his explanation of the 'aether' - which is the 'nothing ness' that connects all of us. He later goes on in the ebook/info on how to possibly extract from this nothing ness to get free energy (perpetual motion - ie - you start a generator and then it keeps on working by itself to generate electricity).

1

Aether



"The first philosophy (Metaphysics) is universal and is exclusively concerned with primary substance"... - Aristotle (340BC)

"...It finally turns out that one can, after all, not get along without metaphysics." - Albert Einstein (Remarks on Bertrand Russell's Theory of Knowledge)

"According to the general theory of relativity, space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense." - Albert Einstein



The Aether, or at least the concept of a primary substance that fills all space, has been subject to debate for eons.
The Aether that I share in this book is the smallest irreducible stuff that we know of. Everything is fundamentally composed of and interacts with this Aether in one way or another.



There are various names for the Aether. Dr. Tom Bearden, a pioneer in advanced energy systems calls it "the virtual photon flux of the quantum mechanical vacuum."
Paul Dirac, another pioneering thinker, developed the concept of a sea of virtual particles, referred to as the Dirac Sea2, which fills all space. These so-called particles are called virtual because as soon as they pop into our dimension they pop out and are therefore only virtually here. The virtual particles are composed of positive virtual photons and negative virtual photons or anti-photons.
Modern-day physicists are discovering the effects of a so-called dark energy -- this is the anti-photon part of the Aether that is self- ordering, time-reversed and also exhibits anti- gravity.
I believe it is necessary to make yet another distinction. The term zero point energy3 is loosely thrown around in many fields and is implied to be the same as the virtual photon sea of potential. It is not. If matter were brought down to absolute zero, supposedly there would be no movement. However, there is still energetic movement. That energy is what zero point energy is referring to.


Zero point energy is directly observable -- meaning that it is not in a virtual state. It may come from the vacuum but the chicken is not the egg. The virtual sea of potential is unobservable. That is why it is called virtual.
For purposes of this book, this virtual photon sea of potential is the exact same thing as the Aether. The Aether is composed of one- dimensional charges that are popping in and out of our existence, filling all space. The net result could be viewed as a neutral particle.
For every positive photon there is an anti- photon. Every time a positive photon has been channeled into the physical world and moves directionally foreword with time flowing foreword, there is an anti-photon that is coming back at it in the opposite direction and is traveling backwards in time, literally.


When the two different photons encounter each other, they cancel each other out.


The net result could be considered a Neutral
"Particle."
However, there seems to be a bias for the positive photons in the universe. With all the self-annihilation, there is a remainder of positive charges that make up the physical universe that we see.
The positive photon can have entropy, which is a dying down of the potential. In other words, entropy is the process of anything ordered that breaks down into chaos. The positive potential will experience entropy whenever there is an interaction with any kind of resistance, heat, friction, etc...
The anti-photon is drawn towards any point of resistance, which is the opposite of the positive photon. This is known as negentropy as it is a self-organizing potential.


These photons in a virtual state are literally pure light potential because they are in a state of probability not yet manifest in our three- dimensional world as something with observable effects.
It has been estimated that in one cubic centimeter of space, there is more unorganized potential available than all the known "matter" in the entire universe.
The Aether is free of mass and is the source of all electrical charge. It is the precursor of any force. Force is an effect of Aether interacting with mass.
The definition of energy that I prefer to use is that energy is simply a word -- an adjective to describe the movement of potential from one level of potential to the other. When potential moves from high to low or low to high, the very action of potential moving is what energy is. There can be a positive energy event and there can be a negative energy event. Therefore, there is literally no such thing as energy.
The dictionary refers to energy as the capacity to do work. Capacity is a potential. Therefore, the dictionary says that energy is potential. This definition totally contradicts itself since energy and potential are actually opposites. There are other definitions that are more accurate in the same dictionaries but if two
33

definitions contradict, the dictionary needs to be rewritten.
You may have heard the clich that "Nothing can travel faster that the speed of light." That really means nothing with mass can travel faster than the speed of light. Since the Aether is free of mass, it can "travel" at the speed of light or faster. That means that it is able to be superluminal (faster than light speed) and can virtually exist at any place in space instantaneously.
Aether is the source of our life force energy. Since ancient times, this healing and spiritual energy has been referred to by many names such as qi, ki, prana, lifeforce, spirit, and Breath of Life.
We get Aether in our food, we breathe it in the air, we drink it in our water and it soaks into every fiber of our being from our external and internal environments.
The personality of the Aether is very chaotic and disordered, but there is an order to this chaos. You can see "snow" on a TV station off air and it is very chaotic looking, but it is fairly symmetrical and evenly spaced about and it takes on the appearance of having an overall order to it. It is chaotic but definitely not random.
A necessary distinction to be made is the difference between Aether and space. Aether
34

fills the space but is not the space. Space is what contains the Aether but is not the Aether.
A fish tank contains water but isn't the water that it holds. Also, distance is not necessarily space itself but is an effect of having space filled with Aether, which we will discuss later.
It is easy to see why the concept of the Aether has been the subject of debate going back for millennia. The ancient philosophies mostly in Eastern thought have clearly understood these concepts and it is only in the last century that the modern day scientists are catching up with ancient knowledge.
With today's brilliant minds, the Aether has been proven to exist scientifically, which is a giant leap for mankind and you'll see why throughout this book. It connects the dots and this is one of the main purposes of The Quantum Key. It is a dot connector between the Aether itself, gravity, inertia and other effects that are veiled under an unnecessary shroud of spiritual mysticism and supposed scientific mystery.
This infinite potential demonstrates a very high intelligence and spiritual nature of its own. This seems self-evident by observing its very nature.
Since it seems that the entire physical universe as we know it springs forth from this intangible medium and God is supposed to have
35

created the universe by nothing more than something intangible such as His Word, I believe that God used the Aether as His medium for creation. From the fact that the Aether can materialize and carry on form it is evident that the Aether has the ability to record, store and play back information in multiple ways.
When looking at anything physical at a small enough level, there is nothing but empty space to be found. Therefore, there is obviously something illusionary about our perception of so-called reality itself. This is an ancient concept known as Maya4, which is God's power of illusion that keeps the truth hidden from us behind a veil.
Eventually, the masses will be conscious enough to intentionally cultivate this Aetheric potential in their body and mind. Currently, this is done by qigong, yoga, tai chi and other exercises so that we increase the potential of our own true selves as the light beings that we are and without a shadow of a doubt we will then have true self-realization that we have never been separate from God, ever.
In the future, people will use advanced quantum technologies to increase their potential.
This will include machines that draw this
Aether right out of time and space and allow a



4 Maya is Sanskrit, which literally means Ma=not Ya=this.


person to hook him or herself up to it in order to soak up this quantum potential.
Furthermore, there will be consciousness technologies that send super potentialized information directly into the Aether for person's subconscious mind to pick up on it through time and space, incorporate the information into their mind and body and start realizing their advanced potential. Perhaps the above two technologies already exist.

Thankfully, we are now in the age of understanding that makes the Aether usable to supply infinite energy for all our power needs. When this is realized by the current paradigm by the masses, there will be the realization that war based on oil is absolutely unthinkable.
Ponder this: The Aether is a gas made of something smaller than the smallest subatomic particles. It moves and flows like a gas under pressure and is all-pervasive. The Breath of God is literally this Aether that gives life to everything.
In the next chapter, you will see not only how we can tap this Aether and cause it to produce useful work in the physical world but also that the Aether has always been what was used all along. It is one thing to recognize its existence but if we are unable to intentionally transform it from a virtual state into a real observable state that can perform usable work in this physical world, then we as humans cannot truly be empowered by it. But we will.
 
Last edited:
We need to find Intelligence on this planet before we look and other planets.

Maybe if we could collectively stop killing each other for no damn reason it would free up some time and resources for more interesting things like SETI.
 
Here is a link to the ebook which I showed an extract from before.

WARNING: IT IS HIGHLY ADDICTIVE. DO NOT READ TOO MUCH OF IT.

Seriously, I read it and got so interested in the sections about "PATHS" - which enables you to increase your brain power and function in various ways that I ended up buying the program and trying it out for a few weeks. Anyway, it seems a lot of people report success from it.. but I didn't find any success after about 1 month on it.

But the information in the eBook is bloody awesome.

If you liked the book or enjoyed it, please give thanks as I can ensure you would not be able to find a copy of it online (I looked everywhere before buying!!)

Sorry, I'll stop derailing this thread with semi-unrelated stuff now!

EDIT: I suppose I should include a D/L Link!!

http://www.mediafire.com/?p7xpvvhxx20y4rj
 
You have a knack for linking worthless articles, Pimp. Anecdotal evidence isn't even evidence, let alone proof.
 
Yes, I am aware of that and unfortunately as you said, no one yet has proven it.

But, let me put something out there. I hope I am not giving everyone the impression here that I am some type of pro-conspiracy person, but here goes..

People have tried to prove such things as perpetual motion before. People have tried to prove other things before, too. But then guess what? They disappear.

Just because no one has proven it to him does not necessarily mean that it is not possible. Or that it does not exist. Because if it is proven, then it is known publicly. And if it is known publicly, we know 'who' will try to 'quieten' it all up.

It is well documented that there was a man (i forget his name) that invented a car that ran mostly (if not all) on hydrogen. He resisted selling off his plans to the big companies, and soon after found himself dead. I'm just saying... people with this technology know it is worth more than a measly $1,000,000...

If you've got some time, read up on the SEG - the Searl Effect Generator. It is meant to be a perpetual motion device (free energy). Basically, once you start this generator, it just keeps on going and going. I can't explain it all too well (technically) but go and have a read if your'e interested. I've been following him on FB and his website and I believe he is receiving funding now in the US to build a working prototype.

This man also claims that this generator, as well as running by itself, produces some type of anti gravity (it pulls up instead of falls to the ground) and claims that his first experiments with making them, they just flew upwards... (read more into it if you like)

Now... the "that is just completely stupid" part. He says that he harnessed this ability for it to create an anti-gravity in a sense, and actually built a UFO like saucer (the typical one everyone imagines when they hear UFO). He claims to have flown it around, and have people come out to watch him fly it years ago. He even claims that someone on the radio (i believe it was in the UK) even announced it after confirming that they saw it (the owner of the radio station was the one to confirm it). Unfortunately, I cannot find much else for evidence to confirm this, but it's probably out there.


Now, this is something I learnt from the eBook I linked above (at least I think it was learnt from there).

A lot of people are too hyped up with the scientific views of TODAY and say, perpetual motion, free energy, ITS NOT POSSIBLE.

Why not? Why isn't free energy possible?

Then they answer, because you cannot get OUT MORE POWER than what you PUT IN to create it.

But guess what? People, like me, who support and believe in free energy (perpetual motion) we are NOT SAYING that you get MORE out than what you put IN. No, that is NOT what we are saying.

You can put in a certain amount of energy, or work, that you can measure physically. So you put in this work into, for example, turning a generator.

But, you're only MEASURING the work that YOU PHYSICALLY put in. Are you MEASURING the work that the aether, or the 'nothingness' PUT IN to it as well? No, you're just measuring what YOU PUT IN.

So, following the guidelines of "you can't get more out than what you put in' it is still possible to get MORE OUT than what we put in PHYSICALLY.

We might put in 10 units of work, but the aethor might also contribute 10 units of work. The total amount of work put in is 20 units.

When you MEASURE what comes out, you measure 15 units of energy. You think, hey, not possible... I only put in 10 units of energy, how can I possibly get out 15?

Simple... there was energy also contributed from somewhere you are unable to explain, and you extracted it, creating a sense of 'overunity'.

Anyway... sorry for my ramblings. I tried to explain well, but I think the eBook I linked will be better :D
 
Indeed why the Government has their eye on it, especially here in Australia. They are trying to impose an internet filter. There is a ridiculous amount of negativity towards implementing it, and a lot of people are opposing - yet the Government says it will not run away from it's campaign just because it is heavily criticized.

So, they're essentially saying that they are going to do their best to put an internet filter in, whether we want it there or not. Democracy?

Further, should an internet filter like this go into play - what type of sites would you assume they're going to block? Sure, I bet there will be some kiddie porn on there. But, what about sites promoting technologies like the ones we speak of here? Or, what if, one day, someone had some REAL proof of UFO's, for example. They wanted to post it on the net, because they can do so anonymously without physically having to present their information to someone - with a filter in place, a site like that would soon be 'filtered'.

We shouldn't let them do what they want. They want us to be slaves forever. World peace? There would be world peace without the greedy corporations causing problems for the world, such as wars (so that money needs to be loaned from the reserve bank, putting countries into debt and making the bankers richer) purely to profit from it.

But, your point of 2012 is interesting. From what I have read, it's either the end, or it's the end as we 'know' it. Despite the world being screwed up, i'm not looking forward to any drastic changes.
 
Last edited:
Its so amazing when you disclose an idea on BHW for example and this is on a small scale compared to the whole internet and before you know it the method/idea is known accross all the major boards and has what IM people call it 'been satuarated'. The spread of information is crazy! Before we never had media on our side but now we have one of the biggest media outlets on our side!

Agree totally. And with this, like you said, slowly people are becoming aware. Precisely why, like you said, the Government is watching the internet with a keen eye.
 
You have a knack for linking worthless articles, Pimp. Anecdotal evidence isn't even evidence, let alone proof.

Hmmm... Then the articles should be a great match for most of your
posts. All of which have garnered you a whopping 95 thanks!

The article is titled, "5 Pieces of Evidence That Suggests Intelligent Alien Life Exists". I just shortened it to, "5 Possible Proofs of Alien Intelligence" to fit the title space allowed, and to make it sound a little bit more interesting. :D Obviously nothing has actually been *proven* per your listed requirements.

It's only worthless if you don't know how to read, use, or apply the info. A skill you seem to excel at, that and complaining. You summed yourself up best when you recently said, "I've read, learned nothing..." (the grammar shows it).

You also have a "talent" for hurling names the moment you see something you disagree with, "Except for the whole 'Adam and Eve' thing not in the slightest explaining how black-skinned humans even came to exist, moron." Toughest guy on the schoolyard.

Next time, just skip over... :beach2(2)
 
Next time, just skip over... :beach2(2)

I think you may have taken the part where I told you you have a knack for linking worthless articles as an insult and a reason to spout intellectually dishonest 'arguments'; however, it was merely a matter-of-factly statement.

Now that is cleared, I must wonder: at what point did you actually start considering your thanks to be anything but clicks on a button, initiated by someone starting to read a thread that was of no substantial use, rather than following the discourse therein and thereby extracting useful information?

And wouldn't it be fair to say that you were excessively quote-mining to falsely present both the intentions and the personality of your opponent, thereby committing a plethora of logical fallacies?

You aren't on my intellectual level, or even near, and this laughably infantile argument does nothing to prove otherwise.

NOTE: in fact, the admittance in your second paragraph proved me right. Go figure.

EDIT: Add to that your obvious arrogance and complete inability to see I far surpass you in every literary respect (the grammar wasn't flawed, by the way), and you are not only disgustingly emotional and irrational, but also hopelessly deluded.

EDIT_2: Your stupidity is overwhelming, so I must now return to ask you the question that would've obsoleted this entire post (as showing your intellectual defect obviously is neither a challenge nor a worthwhile goal): how is all this evidence, or are these 'proofs', not anecdotal? Have you followed even a minor course in logic? You can't extrapolate any sort of data or knowledge from anecdotal evidence since its INHERENTLY (get a dictionary for that one, as you will obviously need to) subjective nature prevents you from doing so, and thus the information provided gives NOTHING to consider. Thinking otherwise is what shows a lack of intelligence; not the other way around. Get that through your thick skull. (Though I doubt you even have the capacity to learn, let alone to admit your error.)
 
Last edited:
The Ancient Aliens series on History was very interesting, lots of possible proof, theories etc..It's a good watch and covers some of the same things in this thread. Google "ancient aliens" or search the history channels site I can't post links yet. and i'm sure you can find a stream somewhere
 
Your ability to concisely present yourself in written form does not indicate your level of intelligence. You're good with grammar, but you can't tell someone else you're above them because of that. What if he is a rocket scientist? See, intelligence can be subjective. Not enticing a 'flame war' here but let's keep on topic - if you invested the time it took you to edit your post several times to make your arguement stronger, into something like making a relevant post, it would be much more beneficial for all to read.

Just saying. Let's keep it on topic.

Why is this dead now? It was so alive before!

I think you may have taken the part where I told you you have a knack for linking worthless articles as an insult and a reason to spout intellectually dishonest 'arguments'; however, it was merely a matter-of-factly statement.

Now that is cleared, I must wonder: at what point did you actually start considering your thanks to be anything but clicks on a button, initiated by someone starting to read a thread that was of no substantial use, rather than following the discourse therein and thereby extracting useful information?

And wouldn't it be fair to say that you were excessively quote-mining to falsely present both the intentions and the personality of your opponent, thereby committing a plethora of logical fallacies?

You aren't on my intellectual level, or even near, and this laughably infantile argument does nothing to prove otherwise.

NOTE: in fact, the admittance in your second paragraph proved me right. Go figure.

EDIT: Add to that your obvious arrogance and complete inability to see I far surpass you in every literary respect (the grammar wasn't flawed, by the way), and you are not only disgustingly emotional and irrational, but also hopelessly deluded.

EDIT_2: Your stupidity is overwhelming, so I must now return to ask you the question that would've obsoleted this entire post (as showing your intellectual defect obviously is neither a challenge nor a worthwhile goal): how is all this evidence, or are these 'proofs', not anecdotal? Have you followed even a minor course in logic? You can't extrapolate any sort of data or knowledge from anecdotal evidence since its INHERENTLY (get a dictionary for that one, as you will obviously need to) subjective nature prevents you from doing so, and thus the information provided gives NOTHING to consider. Thinking otherwise is what shows a lack of intelligence; not the other way around. Get that through your thick skull. (Though I doubt you even have the capacity to learn, let alone to admit your error.)
 
Back
Top