302 redirect it will pass some juice?
- Thread starter Luco
- Start date
MatthewGraham
BANNED
- Oct 6, 2015
- 1,755
- 2,746
As opposed to a 301?
dr_0x
Regular Member
- May 9, 2010
- 307
- 266
Check out this thread for some info on the subject.
Luco
Banned by request of account holder
- Dec 7, 2016
- 1,020
- 1,109
Yes.
From what I have read on WEB some guy's say that if the 302 will stay a long time live then google will threat like 301. So I'm a little bit confused.
dr_0x
Regular Member
- May 9, 2010
- 307
- 266
It makes sense to me since it's fairly common for sites to use all kinds of redirects. 301, 302, and meta-refresh are all fairly common. However, since they also all have their intended use cases, maybe the algorithms are smart enough to determine the actual context of the link.
Jackmind
BANNED
- Jan 12, 2018
- 17
- 1
Do not 301 redirect them if you are going to be recreating the pages. A 301 redirect indicates a permanent redirect to Google.
They would eventually figure out that the 301 redirect is no longer active, but it could take weeks or even months before you would see those URLs ever indexed again.
I would do a 302 redirect if the pages are going to be down for an extended period of time. If they are just down for a week or so, I probably wouldn't do anything.
Do you really have to take them down at all though?
They would eventually figure out that the 301 redirect is no longer active, but it could take weeks or even months before you would see those URLs ever indexed again.
I would do a 302 redirect if the pages are going to be down for an extended period of time. If they are just down for a week or so, I probably wouldn't do anything.
Do you really have to take them down at all though?